ur saying the underlined based on her word alone tho
I noticed u never addressed my direct questions about him being able defend himself if she were lying (but of course u obviously don't believe women can be liars, which is why I made my initial comments about only defending shorty cuz she's a woman)
and u said the condom thing was obvious but it isn't.........especially since she admitted she didn't do her due diligence before letting cuzzo stick in the 1st place
1. Her lack of due diligence doesn't negate what he did. So when your entire commentary is on what she didn't do as opposed to the actual violation that he committed then you look like you're riding for people to violate consent.
2. At the bold I didn't reply to it because it's not only a lie but a dumbass one on top of it. Never once did I defend her decision making because it's obvious. I don't feel the need to play Captain Obvious just to try and shift blame elsewhere. But you and too many others here have this wild ass habit of feeling the need to always find fault in the person who was violated whenever someone is the victim of a sexual assault and talk about what they could've done instead of talking about how what was done to them was foul. Can't just call wrong wrong and gotta always do some whataboutism type shit creating scenarios that didn't happen instead of focusing on what actually did happen. Find a scenario where something different happens and I'll respond in kind as i always do. But when you come into a thread about a woman being sexually violated and your only comments are about what blame/fault she should take then yeah you're just exposing your own twisted pov.