This Woman Was Sexually Assaulted At A Party By This Guy......Story Inside

[Eyerone]

there’s like….multiple forms of rape.


Y’all do know this right?

 

[SeaSnake]

there’s like….multiple forms of rape.


Y’all do know this right?

no they don’t but honestly it’s like they wanna defend rape with such passion. Those be the dudes who hate feminists and women having rights posting 3 hour long incel videos

 

[SeaSnake]

Under the law?


Yes.


By definition?


No.

The law defines it lol how you 50 and been watching the news and act like this is new or that the law is wrong

 

[Chi-Town B]

Consensual sex is not rape, he did not force herself on her. Like @deadeye said if you wanna make it a crime then call it something else. He's a dirtbag but not a rapist.

It was a scumbag thing to do but not rape.

 

[deadeye]

The law defines it lol how you 50 and been watching the news and act like this is new or that the law is wrong

If you know your history, you'd realize that...........just because something is legal or illegal...........doesn't necessarily make it right.


Other than forcible penetration, I only consider statutory rape (or anything involving children) to be in the same category.

 

[SeaSnake]

If you know your history, you'd realize that...........just because something is legal or illegal...........doesn't necessarily make it right.


Other than forcible penetration, I only consider statutory rape (or anything involving children) to be in the same category.

thus you are a creep

 

[deadeye]

thus you are a creep

That doesn't even make sense bruh, but I'm gonna leave this here to remind you of your history:

 

[deadeye]

there’s like….multiple forms of rape.


Y’all do know this right?

As defined by the law..........yes.


In the truest sense of the word..........no.

 

[BlackRain]

Consensual sex is not rape, he did not force herself on her. Like @deadeye said if you wanna make it a crime then call it something else. He's a dirtbag but not a rapist.

It was a scumbag thing to do but not rape.

She didn't consent to sex without a condom...so even trying to use your own twisted definition this would be rape.

 

[deadeye]

She didn't consent to sex without a condom...so even trying to use your own twisted definition this would be rape.

No, it would be a violation of consent.


To be more specific, violation of consent to wear a condom.


Not a violation of consent to have sex.


2 separate issues.

 

[BlackRain]

No, it would be a violation of consent.


To be more specific, violation of consent to wear a condom.


Not a violation of consent to have sex.


2 separate issues.

If someone violates your consent to have sex in the way you requested then they also violated your consent to have sex. There is no difference between the two.

 

[DMorgan]

No, it would be a violation of consent.


To be more specific, violation of consent to wear a condom.


Not a violation of consent to have sex.


2 separate issues.

You do understand that there would be no sex if there was no condom? So that is a violation of her consent to have sex because her consent was 100% based off him wearing a condom.

You can have your opinion but you can't have your own facts.

 

[Chi-Town B]

She didn't consent to sex without a condom...so even trying to use your own twisted definition this would be rape.

And it makes it something else other than rape. We can agree to disagree

 

[DMorgan]

A lot of times I can see and sometimes even respect the other sides POV even if I disagree with it.

This shit here though. Some of yall are on some completely other shit that 100% lacking in any logic at all.

 

[deadeye]

You do understand that there would be no sex if there was no condom? So that is a violation of her consent to have sex because her consent was 100% based off him wearing a condom.

You can have your opinion but you can't have your own facts.

I thought he took the condom off.


In which case, what do you classify what happened when he had the condom on?


Violation of consent...........I can even go with calling it sexual assault, but I can't call it rape since they were having sex before the condom was taken off.

 

[deadeye]

Can't believe people looking at this the same way as situations in which people were violently raped and had someone force themselves on them.


Kind of an insult to them when you think about it.

 

[DMorgan]

I thought he took the condom off.


In which case, what do you classify what happened when he had the condom on?


Violation of consent...........I can even go with calling it sexual assault, but I can't call it rape since they were having sex before the condom was taken off.

You didn't even read the fucking statement and story but got all this shit to say and taking stances against the facts of the victim

 

[BlackRain]

I thought he took the condom off.


In which case, what do you classify what happened when he had the condom on?


Violation of consent...........I can even go with calling it sexual assault, but I can't call it rape since they were having sex before the condom was taken off.

You realize on the very 1st page is the woman's account of what happened and in it she says he never put a condom on. Not that he had one on and took it off...but he literally never put one on.

 

[deadeye]

You didn't even read the fucking statement and story but got all this shit to say and taking stances against the facts of the victim

Sorry, still not rape because she willingly had sex with him.

 

[deadeye]

Niggas will come at me for bullshit like this, but not a fucking word for a nigga who pisses in a fucking soda machine.


Just goes to show y'all pick and choose what you're outraged about based on the person.........not their stance.


To hell with the whole lot of you.


I'm taking a nap.