konceptjones
The one between three and three.
Even you acknowledged that most mass shooters aren’t responsible gun owners and the recent ones just go out and buy the guns for this sole purpose.
So all of the arguments you make about about how to get around these bans and limits require a good deal of firearm knowledge, right?
So therefore a barrier to entry would be established with some fairly basic limits, correct? Since these mass shooters are not very knowledgeable gun owners?
I showed how even the limits you proposed wouldn't have stopped the majority of the mass shootings in either the Highland Park or Uvalde thread. This cat used a single gun to shoot up his almost-former job. So much for limits on the number you can own. The cat at Michigan State only had two, same for Virginia Tech, Uvalde only had one as with Parkland. Ammo limits are simply impossible to track. Magazine capacity limits don't work: Just ask anybody caught in a crossfire in Cali, Maryland, or New York.
And, since we know that "mass shootings" definitely includes Pookie and Ray Ray shooting up the club trying to kill one another but hitting innocent bystanders, you have to account for all of the illegal guns in circulation in the hands of people that definitely shouldn't have them. There's no shortage of folks out there willing to sell guns illegally and no shortage of ghost guns coming into this country so someone wanting to kill will get their hands on the very weapons you seek to ban (If you have a moment, watch NatGeo's Underworld Inc's episode on Ghost Guns on Hulu where you'll watch dudes in a fuckin village in the Philipines expertly craft 1911 clone handguns from fuckin scratch to be smuggled here and sold on the streets).