It's not exaggerated. Even divorce lawyers admit it's unfair.
And the origins of the system don't matter when the only thing those origins were brought up for was to place blame on men for the system. Yes, men created the fucked up system, but how does that change the fact that the system needs to be fixed or give insight on how the system should be fixed. How does the fact that men back then made the system change the fact that men now are being hurt by the system? Ya'll can play this game all you want, but ya'll are being disingenuous. We all know that he had a stick up his ass this whole topic because he believed (perhaps rightfully so) that Dos was wrongly blaming the victims, so he chose to go tit for tat to find a way to blame men in the secondary discussion.
This is so far off base it's hilarious. Me and Dos go back and forth all the time with me calling the stuff he says stupid.
Your also bringing up stuff that I never said nor implied. Just conclusions you jumped to on your own simply because I noted why shit works the way it does. Somehow you took me talking about the origins of shit as saying that means it doesn't need to change and that's a huge leap you gotta figure out why you made on your own. Literally ended my first post by saying shit won't change until the anger is directed at society that creates the mindsets that allow the system to operate the way it does and you somehow took that as saying shit doesn't need to or will never change?