KeKe Palmer's boyfriend takes issue with her choice in attire to attend the Usher concert. Update: Keke has rescinded the protective order

[MoeW]

Keke Palmer Granted Temporary Sole Custody of Son Leodis, 8 Months, with No Visitation for Ex Darius Jackson

Keke Palmer, 30, has been granted temporary sole custody of son Leodis, 8 months, following an emergency domestic violence filing on Thursday.

people.com

Keke Palmer has been granted temporary sole custody of her 8-month-old son.

On Thursday, the Nope actress, 30, filed a request for a domestic violence restraining order against the infant's father, Darius Jackson, in Los Angeles. Palmer asked the court for full physical and legal custody of Leodis, detailing multiple allegations of physical abuse in the filing, according to documents reviewed by PEOPLE.

In response to the emergency filing, the Los Angeles County judge granted a temporary restraining order that states that Jackson must stay at least 100 yards away from both the actress and their son, as well as any childcare or schooling established for the infant.

In addition to granting Palmer temporary sole physical and legal custody of Leo, the temporary restraining order states that Jackson is not allowed to have visitation with his son, with a hearing set for Dec. 5 to determine further action on the temporary arrangement.

 

[Chi-Town B]

No visitation, that's bullshit

 

[DOS_patos]

What he do to the kid that he needs to stay away?
Wasn’t he the main one watching the kid?

But I guess niggas ok with that too

 

[Chi-Town B]

They say you can't see your kid but make sure financially you keep that up.

 

[SeaSnake]

Yea because abusing the mom means the kid is totally safe. And yes even if you can’t see your kid you still need to pay for them

 

[Chi-Town B]

What he do to the kid that he needs to stay away?
Wasn’t he the main one watching the kid?

But I guess niggas ok with that too

Throw out an abuse allegation and let the court stop a dad from being around. Chicks been running this play for decades

 

[Inori]

Throw out an abuse allegation and let the court stop a dad from being around. Chicks been running this play for decades

maybe the court saw actual video footage instead of the stills that came out and made their decision based off of that

 

[DOS_patos]

Yea because abusing the mom means the kid is totally safe. And yes even if you can’t see your kid you still need to pay for them

Sooooo
The mother didn’t tell the police her daughter was being abused fir two yrs and the daughter left the kid with the dad while he was abusing her fir two years?

Nobody care about they offspring

 

[SeaSnake]

Sooooo
The mother didn’t tell the police her daughter was being abused fir two yrs and the daughter left the kid with the dad while he was abusing her fir two years?

Nobody care about they offspring

You got it she just as bad as him

 

[Chi-Town B]

maybe the court saw actual video footage instead of the stills that came out and made their decision based off of that

Unless it shows him abusing the child then he should be allowed to have contact, just have designated drop off and Keke don't have to be there

 

[Inori]

Unless it shows him abusing the child then he should be allowed to have contact, just have designated drop off and Keke don't have to be there

If he caught on camera abusing his woman, cant take the chance he could abuse the child as well

 

[DOS_patos]

If he caught on camera abusing his woman, cant take the chance he could abuse the child as well

You have a point.
So is this the first time? Cuz if it’s been two yrs and she left the child in his care all this time …..did he abuse the child too?
Or are we now not taking a chance?

 

[The Lonious Monk]

Yea because abusing the mom means the kid is totally safe. And yes even if you can’t see your kid you still need to pay for them

That's bullshit bro. If he's abusing the mom, then he needs to pay for that, but conflict between parents doesn't necessitate abuse of children. Unless, they got some proof he's been mistreating the kid, denying him access to his child is bullshit.

 

[Chi-Town B]

If he caught on camera abusing his woman, cant take the chance he could abuse the child as well

If he's abusing his woman and has never done anything to the child then he shouldn't have his kid taken from him.

 

[Inori]

That's bullshit bro. If he's abusing the mom, then he needs to pay for that, but conflict between parents doesn't necessitate abuse of children. Unless, they got some proof he's been mistreating the kid, denying him access to his child is bullshit.

Doesnt necessitate it but it could be argued that dude has impulse control issues. What happens if the kid does something that pisses him off and in turn the child ends up getting hurt? Or if dude hurts the child to get back at the mom? Maybe supervised visits is the middle ground until they can get the shit sorted out and not denying him access altogether.

Aint pickin any sides in this cuz iono them people or their lives but the wellbeing of the kid should be at the forefront.

 

[DOS_patos]

So embarrass him
Mock him
Make two songs dissing him
Make abuse allegations
And now take his kid.

Where was all this before usher?

 

[The Lonious Monk]

Doesnt necessitate it but it could be argued that dude has impulse control issues. What happens if the kid does something that pisses him off and in turn the child ends up getting hurt? Or if dude hurts the child to get back at the mom? Maybe supervised visits is the middle ground until they can get the shit sorted out and not denying him access altogether.

Aint pickin any sides in this cuz iono them people or their lives but the wellbeing of the kid should be at the forefront.

That's a bunch of baseless assumptions. If he's shown some propensity towards harming the child, then by all means take his rights. However, beef between the parents should not automatically apply to parental rights.

Women be slapping the shit out of men when they don't like something those men say or do, but ain't nobody taking kids away from women for that.

 

[DOS_patos]

Doesnt necessitate it but it could be argued that dude has impulse control issues. What happens if the kid does something that pisses him off and in turn the child ends up getting hurt? Or if dude hurts the child to get back at the mom? Maybe supervised visits is the middle ground until they can get the shit sorted out and not denying him access altogether.

Aint pickin any sides in this cuz iono them people or their lives but the wellbeing of the kid should be at the forefront.

It should but was it up to this point?

Everything you said is true and great points.

 

[DOS_patos]

It’s cray enough dudes are making claims without proof.

But now dudes ok with taking kids away from a dude who’s been caring for the kid with no proof he harmed the kid.

This is a new low

Yes, things can happen and change. But the same can happen with both parents in the home or in the parking lot at Walmart.

I’m not even sure what’s going on anymore.

 

[Inori]

That's a bunch of baseless assumptions. If he's shown some propensity towards harming the child, then by all means take his rights. However, beef between the parents should not automatically apply to parental rights.

Women be slapping the shit out of men when they don't like something those men say or do, but ain't nobody taking kids away from women for that.

If the roles were reversed Id say the same shit.

EVERYBODY need to keep they hands to they damn selves and if you aint got enough self control, male or female, where you hittin on somebody cuz you upset about some shit then maybe you dont need to be around kids you can potentially hurt