The Mad Titan
Active Member
33 is close enough.
33 Dead, 130 Injured in China Knife-Wielding Spree
<p>State officials blame the attack in Yunnan province on separatist 'terrorists.'</p>www.nbcnews.com
The Mad Titan
Active Member
Piece of shit stabbed up 6 people, including an officer within a few minutes couple years ago.
news.sky.com
Glasgow stabbings: Hero police officer critical after stabbing attack in city centre
The 42-year-old police officer is among six people injured after a mass stabbing at a city centre hotel.
The Mad Titan
Active Member
Damn, I dont even remember hearing about this piece of shit. Stabbed 14 people.
www.reuters.com
Student planned Texas stabbing rampage for some time: police
The man who went on a stabbing rampage at a Texas college had planned his attack "for some time," and had fantasized about stabbing people since the age of eight, Sheriff Adrian Garcia said at a news conference on Wednesday.
www.reuters.com
mike030270
Memes
Thread about stabbing turns into a gun debate lol
Allah_U_Akbar
New Member
Cut it out, fam.
That was a group of knife wielding terrorists… Not just 1 man.
Why did you post that?
That was a group of knife wielding terrorists… Not just 1 man.
Why did you post that?
Allah_U_Akbar
New Member
Nobody died.Piece of shit stabbed up 6 people, including an officer within a few minutes couple years ago.
Glasgow stabbings: Hero police officer critical after stabbing attack in city centre
The 42-year-old police officer is among six people injured after a mass stabbing at a city centre hotel.
The Mad Titan
Active Member
Not every victim dies in mass shootings either. Thats not the argument here
The Mad Titan
Active Member
Where? Both articles stated the attacks were carried out by one man
Allah_U_Akbar
New Member
Fam, did you actually read this article???
33 Dead, 130 Injured in China Knife-Wielding Spree
<p>State officials blame the attack in Yunnan province on separatist 'terrorists.'</p>
www.nbcnews.com
It said there were a group of knife wielding terrorists who carried out these attacks.
Somebody always dies in mass shootings… Which makes them far more dangerous… That’s the point.
For the record, I don’t think guns should be banned.
There’s countries where people are allowed to own guns that have ZERO mass shootings.
The United States could do the same, but they’re too stupid.
SeaSnake
OG
You gotta think how off someone is to try to lower the amount damage a knife can do in a certain amount of time. Just the other day dude was riding around Memphis for FOUR hours and killed four people.
These dudes arguing If you can kill 50 people in 5 minutes with a knife.
Dude in Memphis used a gun right
The Mad Titan
Active Member
Fam, did you actually read this article???
33 Dead, 130 Injured in China Knife-Wielding Spree
<p>State officials blame the attack in Yunnan province on separatist 'terrorists.'</p>
It said there were a group of knife wielding terrorists who carried out these attacks.
Somebody always dies in mass shootings… Which makes them far more dangerous… That’s the point.
For the record, I don’t think guns should be banned.
There’s countries where people are allowed to own guns that have ZERO mass shootings.
The United States could do the same, but they’re too stupid.
That article wasnt the one shown on my end as being the one you quoted, it was the other two I posted.
To your second point, I mentioned this in another thread. We can't keep comparing what works in outher countries that have less people than California along with way better standards of living and automatically think their gun laws will work here.
Its not an apples to apple argument
konceptjones
The one between three and three.
#4
No one says it's as effective. You made that up.
Even still, a bomb could wipe out more people and injure even more in a fraction of a second than a gunman could in 10-15 minutes.
Oklahoma City bomb did this:
"... the bombing ... killed at least 168 people,[1] injured more than 680 others, and destroyed more than one-third of the building, which had to be demolished.[2] The blast destroyed or damaged 324 other buildings within a 16-block radius, shattered glass in 258 nearby buildings, and destroyed or burned 86 cars,[3][4] causing an estimated $652 million worth of damage."
Bomb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a dude with a poodle shooter.
Allah_U_Akbar
New Member
konceptjones
The one between three and three.
My argument/statement, for the fifth time, is that when someone wants to kill a bunch of people and guns are not available or restricted, they will find a way and this incident is a testament to that. I've been saying that for quite a while now across several threads.
SeaSnake
OG
Well duh bombs are bigger but it ain’t as easy to make a bomb Vs buy a gun I can get a gun with an id and a decent record and some other small shit when even the last time you heard about a bombing?
SeaSnake
OG
and I think nobody has debated it because that is true. But somebody will find a way. But y’all acting like one way is not way more effective. Like it’s a reason niggas don’t have sword fights
SeaSnake
OG
How many shooting in your city
Inori
NAWF
Yah I think i've seen you be pretty consistent on that stance whenever these topics seem to come up.
But when we discuss these topics it's not about what's the most efficient way to kill somebody if you set your mind to it.. we're discussing how these type of guns that can kill many people in a very short amount of time are way too easy to get and it should probably be harder to obtain.
all this other side shit doesnt really matter imo