Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

COMMUNITY Women can be pedophiles too- Official "Teacher assaults student" thread v2

JohnSmithCAN said:
Exactly. Not being a textbook teenage molester while still feeling sexual attraction toward teenagers still make you a hebephile or ephebophile. Lest, someone having either of these pulses.

It's like saying you are not a textbook queer because you're good at hiding the occasional instances you've been having a "gay" lisp and the TOCs that came with the territory, gawking at a person of same sex's body or personality with a nonplatonical afterthought and smash women everynight. Yes, you're not identifying to a label: but you still have lingering homosexual tendencies regardless.

That's the same thing. At the end of the day, you get a hard-on and feels a titillating blood rush over a man's booty. Or in the said context, toward a female childs aged between 12-17. The only thing that keep you away from becoming like the ones who sasiated in their hubris was that your morals are either strong enough... or you're having a TikTok account and are basically a hypocrite.
Or even worse, you're being familiar with the dark side of PornHub, Deviantart and the Dark Web.
Click to expand...

But even then. Are these teachers and tutor or older filial-like figures with these lingering deviant impulses are they really self-resilient enough their own demons, both morally and mentally wise? After seeing how many of you liked my past comment about those female teachers and older quasi-relatives with a badly-covert crush on their students or younger brothers's exes and their behavioral patterns... I can tell these incidences are not exclusive at all and that many of us have been into the same boat (whether how she or they coaxed you around or inside that said boat depends on your personal story) .

Terrifyingly NOT. Exclusive... at all...
 
Lucas said:
You can keep it yourself but the fact that the attraction is there is what makes you a pedophile. If you think a 5 year old kid is sexually attractive - you're a pedo even if you never become an abuser.

If fucking a 17 year old should be described as a pedo you would also have to label anyone who's been attracted to a 17 year old a pedo.
Click to expand...

The first part: Nobody is arguing that. I would like to think everyone here is in agreement on that shit.

The second part: This is where I have a fundamental problem with the shit you're going hard for. You're trying to get us to come to this conclusion, and it seems like you're pressing to get me to say something to play into what appears to be your position that fuckin with a 17 year old ain't pedo.

It is. Deal with it.
 
deadeye said:
Depends on the state.


There was a 17yr old in GA who got locked up for almost 10 years for messing with a 15yr old.


Forgot all the details because the story is over 10yrs old, but it's not as far-fetched as it seems.
Click to expand...

17 and 15 is not 17 and 18

Don’t change the numbers when the ages of 17-18 was the exact age that was brought up
 
deadeye said:
Depends on the state.


There was a 17yr old in GA who got locked up for almost 10 years for messing with a 15yr old.


Forgot all the details because the story is over 10yrs old, but it's not as far-fetched as it seems.
Click to expand...

Genralow Wilson I think. Happened in the mid 2000s. Despite the girl and her mom said it was consensual, still went to jail for it smh
 
Dwayne said:
17 and 15 is not 17 and 18

Don’t change the numbers when the ages of 17-18 was the exact age that was brought up
Click to expand...

I think this was the case that prompted GA to enact "Romeo and Juliet" laws similar to other states, whereby it's legal as long as the two individuals are within 2-3 years in age or something to that effect.
 
Bobjones said:
I'm 29 and have had an 18 year old girl show slight interest. It was obvious enough when she previously lied telling me she was 23.

I don't know about any of u and ur dealings with women of that age but the overriding sense I got in all our conversations (we work together btw, please don't go assuming I ever reciprocated any interest) was that she's exactly as naive and immature as you'd expect someone still in or just out of highschool to be. I don't use those terms as slights, it's just a fact of inexperience.

That's not something I find attractive in the least as a grown man.

So even for women of that age (high teens), it shouldn't be as simple or shortsighted as how good they might look (in appearing physically developed). That viewpoint is disturbingly opportunistic to me. it's the psychology of it.
Click to expand...

Very few of them are both emotionally and psychologically mature enough to process and experiment with the same fluency and developmental awareness than slightly older adult women in their early-mid to late twenties showcases. And almost no one are as fully mature than most women above age thirty.

The same thing can be told about young men with their high teens being less mature than both slightly older men and men above age 30.
 
Dwayne said:
No they wouldn’t.
Click to expand...

Well... in Canada, we could. Depending the context.

A sixteen or seventeen years old teenage boy or girl who has been coercively enticed into sex or intimal contact by his/her slightly older partner of 18 years or older can sue his/her ass for molesting against a minor because it still loosely qualifies as statuory rape.
 
konceptjones said:
Whiole lotta splittin' hairs on this 17 year old shit. Niggas is really outchea trying to come up on 17 year old ass without getting the "pedo" label? Is that what this is about???
Click to expand...

naw. That just not what a pedo is.

you can have sex with 17 year old that looks like Beyoncé and if she told you she was 30 you wouldn’t be a pedo. Just a fool.

cmon bruh. You know what a pedo is
 
Dwayne said:
naw. That just not what a pedo is.

you can have sex with 17 year old that looks like Beyoncé and if she told you she was 30 you wouldn’t be a pedo. Just a fool.

cmon bruh. You know what a pedo is
Click to expand...

And if she flat out told you she was 17? You're grown as hell and have full knowledge that this is a 17 year old.

'cause that appears to be the premise of the argument being put forth.
 
JohnSmithCAN said:
Well... in Canada, we could. Depending the context.

A sixteen or seventeen years old teenage boy or girl who has been coercively enticed into sex or intimal contact by his/her slightly older partner of 18 years or older can sue his/her ass for molesting against a minor because it still loosely qualifies as statuory rape.
Click to expand...

One of my ex-hookups was freaked out the day I realized that her early further advances on me were basically this, and that I'd started to point it out every once and again ever a little much angrily about it.

At these times, she just blew up her eighteen candles. I was first sixteen then barely seventeen: annoyingly naive, priggish and as stuck-up at them boys come (tHaNks tO mY cHrIsTiAn oF aFrIcAn iMmIgRaNt mOtHeR... ?) .
For a virginally "chaste" prick teaser, she was quite the abuser when I was younger and so socially dull about girls.
 
Dwayne said:
naw. That just not what a pedo is.

you can have sex with 17 year old that looks like Beyoncé and if she told you she was 30 you wouldn’t be a pedo. Just a fool.

cmon bruh. You know what a pedo is
Click to expand...

Unless you came from a neighborhood where black folks cannot none only crack but does not mature and/or that she was a proficient liar, these men did have suspected that something was off about them.

Their mannerisms, their looks, the fact they ain't knowing shit about TuPac...
 
JohnSmithCAN said:
Unless you came from a neighborhood where black folks cannot none only crack but does not mature and/or that she was a proficient liar, these men did have suspected that something was off about them.

Their mannerisms, their looks, the fact they ain't knowing shit about TuPac...
Click to expand...

You're starting to converse about where were you been and what what were you doing on the Eve of the year 2000, 9/11 or the Great Krasch of 2008 and she's like: "damn, that's history."

:huh2:
 
Dwayne said:
17 and 15 is not 17 and 18

Don’t change the numbers when the ages of 17-18 was the exact age that was brought up
Click to expand...


That's the point.


17 and 15 is worse because...........technically............they're both minors since neither of them is 18.


So, if a 17yr old minor can get charged for being with another minor............what do you think would happen to an 18yr old legal adult who's with a minor???




Iono man gif.gif
 
konceptjones said:
The first part: Nobody is arguing that. I would like to think everyone here is in agreement on that shit.

The second part: This is where I have a fundamental problem with the shit you're going hard for. You're trying to get us to come to this conclusion, and it seems like you're pressing to get me to say something to play into what appears to be your position that fuckin with a 17 year old ain't pedo.

It is. Deal with it.
Click to expand...

Well, I disagree with you and I gave you two examples to prove my point. If you agree with the first part you should also agree with the second part, that's my take.
 
deadeye said:
That's the point.


17 and 15 is worse because...........technically............they're both minors since neither of them is 18.


So, if a 17yr old minor can get charged for being with another minor............what do you think would happen to an 18yr old legal adult who's with a minor???




View attachment 462390
Click to expand...

Okay. You obviously don’t know the laws. So I’ll just not answer you anymore on this
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top