Underrated, Overrated, Properly rated Series: Scarface (1983) Al Pacino

Vote


  • Total voters
    47
Status
Not open for further replies.
81 isnt high?

8/10 people isnt high?

the 95 is basically 9/10 people

what i asked, and i was very specific. Why did they (the people on this site) rate the film but didnt care enough to have a discussion about it to support their decision? c'mon b.

it was you and infamous out of at the time 13 people who voted this as properly rated. Ya'll were the only two standing on your positions, while i disagreed, i appreciated ya'll standing with your position and didnt do a drive by vote.

so, using your example again....and i also explained this in the departed thread i think

Both the critics and the viewers rated this pretty high. IMO, the movie is overrated...Remember overrated /= wack

With Paid in Full, the critics gave it a low score, the audience gave it a high score, so at that point, i can either say its underrated or properly rated

NOW, if everyone in here thinks we should take an average of the scores, maybe we can try that. That would still make this movie a (81 + 95/(2) = 88) ...so it still roughly 9/10 people thinks this is good to great movie.

I think its overrated...and here we are

81 is low af in this context fam. All of the movies that the critics rate "classics" are rated between 94-100, there's no critically acclaimed films rated below 90.

Meanwhile you're in here acting like if the cure for cancer wasn't revealed in Scarface it's overrated.


You win fam.
 
very surprised at the Mister b vote lol
 
Narcissist. Tony talked shit because he truly hated those folks and he wasn't afraid to die. You forget how he used to get down in Colombia.

I agree, everyone can't follow Tony blueprint to the top, but someone sure can. It ain't like Tony died 60yrs later or anything. As you said about the pacing.....the entire movie was the span of a yr? Maybe 2?

The "eye popping out" scene in Casino was a real event. Niggas talk shit in those moments every fuckin day. But yea, it is what it is.
 
81 is low af in this context fam. All of the movies that the critics rate "classics" are rated between 94-100, there's no critically acclaimed films rated below 90.

Meanwhile you're in here acting like if the cure for cancer wasn't revealed in Scarface it's overrated.


You win fam.
you moving goalposts and over complicating this b

what's the difference between you saying 94-100 and 9/10 people?

why cant it just be something as simple as "9/10 people feel this way about x" and go from there
 
you moving goalposts and over complicating this b

what's the difference between you saying 94-100 and 9/10 people?

why cant it just be something as simple as "9/10 people feel this way about x" and go from there

You're not being realistic. 3 mics is a mediocre album. It's still 3/5 which is the majority, but that's a pretty bad rated album. There's no 3 mic classic albums.
 
"Yo, they rated Lebron 71 on NBA2k"


AP: ThAt'S StIlL 71 OuT oF 100
watch this

the rating is a culmination of several physical attributes with stats factored into this

Lebron rated as a 71 is nowhere the same as 7/10 people rating a movie the same

Lebron rated as a 71 would have to assume a steep decline in his physical abilities which in turn effect his statistical output

you wanna try this again?
 
  • Ether
Reactions: Mister
You're not being realistic. 3 mics is a mediocre album. It's still 3/5 which is the majority, but that's a pretty bad rated album. There's no 3 mic classic albums.
3/5 is slightly above average

yes, there are no classic albums rated at 3

HOWEVER

there are albums that were rated as a 3 that people felt should at a minimum have been 4, deeming it underrated

even if you subscribe to the album being a 3, you would probably say it was properly rated.

But if an album is a 3 but called a 5, you would would say it was overrated

where is the disconnect?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mister
watch this

the rating is a culmination of several physical attributes with stats factored into this

Lebron rated as a 71 is nowhere the same as 7/10 people rating a movie the same

Lebron rated as a 71 would have to assume a steep decline in his physical abilities which in turn effect his statistical output

you wanna try this again?

leo.gif



It could be Kwame brown, 71 isn't a good rating. 81 isn't a good rating. Allstars/ classics are atleast 90 and up.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sony Montana
3/5 is slightly above average

yes, there are no classic albums rated at 3

HOWEVER

there are albums that were rated as a 3 that people felt should at a minimum have been 4, deeming it underrated

even if you subscribe to the album being a 3, you would probably say it was properly rated.

But if an album is a 3 but called a 5, you would would say it was overrated

where is the disconnect?

Because you're in the Paid In Full thread telling niggas to vote based off RT <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


But in here saying telling people to vote based on popular opinion.



I got a headache, yall win.
 
View attachment 308671



It could be Kwame brown, 71 isn't a good rating. 81 isn't a good rating. Allstars/ classics are atleast 90 and up.

Goldie, using your logic, how many players do you think have been rated 99 in the history of video games in comparison to how many players there a have been?

71 is a good rating if the mean of ratings is 60

81 is a good rating if the mean of ratings is 70

which means you are above average

there's a reason they dont just hand out 99 ratings to people
 
Goldie, using your logic, how many players do you think have been rated 99 in the history of video games in comparison to how many players there a have been?

71 is a good rating if the mean of ratings is 60

81 is a good rating if the mean of ratings is 70

which means you are above average

there's a reason they dont just hand out 99 ratings to people


I said 90 and up, there's been mad niggas rated 90 and up.


lol @ 99, you can do better than this.
 
Because you're in the Paid In Full thread telling niggas to vote based off RT <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


But in here saying telling people to vote based on popular opinion.



I got a headache, yall win.

if that's what you took from what I said, then this is my fault, but i stand by my general sentiments about the baseline ratings.

So again i ask would it be better to take the mean of the critics and audience score? I'm trying to find a way that everyone will agree will be the standard moving forward
 
I said 90 and up, there's been mad niggas rated 90 and up.


lol @ 99, you can do better than this.

fine

how many people you think are rated 90 and above in relation to the amount of players in the game?

you think there are that many 90 and up rated people in a video game?
 
i found it

this is from last July from NBA 2k20

13 players were 90 or above

now where do we go from here

1. LeBron James, 97 overall

2. Kawhi Leonard, 97

3. Giannis Antetokounmpo, 96

4. Kevin Durant, 96

5. James Harden, 96

6. Stephen Curry, 95

7. Anthony Davis, 94

8. Paul George, 93

9. Damian Lillard, 92

10. Joel Embiid, 91

11. Kyrie Irving, 91

12. Nikola Jokic, 90

13. Russell Westbrook, 90

14. Klay Thompson, 89

15. Karl-Anthony Towns, 89

16. Jimmy Butler, 88

17. Kemba Walker, 88

18. Donovan Mitchell, 88

19. Rudy Gobert, 88

20. Blake Griffin, 88
 
i found it

this is from last July from NBA 2k20

13 players were 90 or above

now what


13 players in 1 year?


We're talkin about alltime movie. If we're only rating Scarface against the other movies taht came out in that year then your example would work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.