Matter of fact when CDC posted the Kentucky study it was obvious then. Crazy that they aren't accused of cherry picking especially after the way the evidence panned out.
How about do that from the get go?
As far as I'm aware, at least in US, all that counts is vax shots even if u already test positive for antibodies from infection.Have any benchmarks been established to say what a reasonable level is whether it's from natural immunity, the vaccine or a combination of the two that folks can say ok at this level you should consider a booster?
As far as I'm aware, at least in US, all that counts is vax shots even if u already test positive for antibodies from infection.
So as far as boosters it's just a matter of how long it's been since your last shot.
I know in some countries that acknowledge nat immunity they don't go by actual antibody levels just date of positive test and u have to fall within whatever window they set (ie infection must have occured in past 3, 6, 12 month etc max).