No because you didn't answer the question. Either you think the government should be able to mandate what people do with their bodies and what access to medical services they have or you don't. And if you do then you have to be willing to admit that if it's a states right issue then you're subjecting people to different levels of access based simply on where they live...which is pretty fucked up and another item on the list of reasons why America is failing the way it is.
No you haven’t, but I’d rather not continue debating someone who hides their true motivations behind disingenuous arguments and spin.
Not once have you given credence to the man’s role in these abortions and you haven’t stated any moral objection to abortions. You’ve also not admitted to a POV regarding government’s role in it all.
It’s been the women should make better choices with their bodies. As if women aren’t coerced and lied to by men to have sex with them. As if men don’t slip the condom off during sex or the condom bursts. As if men don’t leave a woman to raise a child alone. As if birth control is 100% effective.
Take it easy bruh and I hope the women in your life aren’t negatively impacted by this.
You do realize the state making the decision is still the government making the decision right? Just remember this stance the moment that control you so willingly want to give up also works against you.
You do realize the state making the decision is still the government making the decision right? Just remember this stance the moment that control you so willingly want to give up also works against you.
This about the dumbest statement you’ve made in this discussion, lol. As if black women won’t be impacted, and more than likely worse than white women.
So Black women should just stay out of the discussion about laws being made that govern what they can do with their bodies? Black men should stay out of a discussion that can alter the course of their lives with children? Like I said if that's your stance then you basically have a lay down attitude about things so your pov is already decided on nearly any topic in the future.
I don’t think he understands how some of this shit really works. And that’s ok, but he shouldn’t speak so confidently on things he doesn’t know. Sometimes it’s better to ask questions than make statements.
Congress passed a law in 1869 limiting it to 9 and they would have to pass a new law to change it….so yeah, technically there is a limit of 9. I would say a law is a tad more than “just tradition.”
If he and her go, others will just crop up to take their place. Sad truth is at the moment they provide cover for those that agree with them but vote in step with other dems. Without that cover, they will step up and do that shit too. Cause at the end of the day, outside of major city areas. Most dems depend on moderate white people and would rather been seen as traders to the dem party than friends to progressive or liberal wing.
Oh his seat will flip whenever he retires. The GOP keep going after him and he always narrowly wins his election by the skin of his teeth. That's why he moves the way he does blocking everything. I say stop prolonging the enviable and just let his ass go.
Congress passed a law in 1869 limiting it to 9 and they would have to pass a new law to change it….so yeah, technically there is a limit of 9. I would saw say a law is a tad more than “just tradition.”
For the most I stopped reading your posts in here about 10 pages ago so I can’t speak to that, but you’re pretty consistent so I’m sure the rest was wrong too
For the most I stopped reading your posts in here about 10 pages ago so I can’t speak to that, but you’re pretty consistent so I’m sure the rest was wrong too
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.