She needs to be protected.
When you say a woman has full control then qualify that statement with “or rather, as much control as they choose to”, you’re admitting there is a loss of control. And that control was taken by the government.
And saying abortion isn’t the end all/be all is an admission that they have control up to a point, which is directly implying a lack of total control.
Just admit you’re cool with the government seizing that control from a woman and we can end this debate.
Clarence Thomas is a conservative Black man from the hell that was the South in the early 20th century. He grew up admiring Malcolm X and believed that America is irremediable. That White people are irredeemable. He read Richard Wright books. He left the seminary when Martin Luther King Jr. got shot.
He had no aspirations of becoming a Supreme Court justice.
Clarence Thomas' politics are not easily understood by modern day Black folks. He has no faith in American institutions. He doesn't believe White people will change. Therefore he believes that the best thing for Black people is to remove strip institutions of their power to bestow and conserve rights.
Conservatives love to talk about how much liberals and leftists hate America, but Black people like Clarence Thomas, legitimately hates America and have no faith in its ability to live up to the ideals it espouses.
Me and your back and forth has nothing to do with this post. You have still yet to address the position of allowing the government have control over what happens inside a woman’s body.Just admit that most of the arguments people are making in support of abortion are based on extenuating circumstances.
I.E............what if this happens...........what if that happens.........what if they have some obscure medical condition........etc.
Anything to deflect from the fact that most abortions don't fall into that category.
If they did, then one of you arguing for abortion would've thrown out that number a long time ago.
Something along the lines of........."90% of abortions are due to this.........80% are due to that............70% are because of this or that medical condition"
But you can't say it.
Why?
Because you know those numbers for what you're arguing aren't anywhere near 90...........80..............or 70 percent.
You can't even say they're anywhere near 50% either.
So all y'alll can resort to is fearmongering and deflection to make it seem like those rare cases are more common than they really are.
People are either gonna have to adapt..........or don't.
Make better decisions...............or not.
Move to another state or do whatever, but all those cop-outs aren't gonna fly anymore.
Just admit that most of the arguments people are making in support of abortion are based on extenuating circumstances.
I.E............what if this happens...........what if that happens.........what if they have some obscure medical condition........etc.
Anything to deflect from the fact that most abortions don't fall into that category.
If they did, then one of you arguing for abortion would've thrown out that number a long time ago.
Something along the lines of........."90% of abortions are due to this.........80% are due to that............70% are because of this or that medical condition"
But you can't say it.
Why?
Because you know those numbers for what you're arguing aren't anywhere near 90...........80..............or 70 percent.
You can't even say they're anywhere near 50% either.
So all y'alll can resort to is fearmongering and deflection to make it seem like those rare cases are more common than they really are.
People are either gonna have to adapt..........or don't.
Make better decisions...............or not.
Move to another state or do whatever, but all those cop-outs aren't gonna fly anymore.
This is their problem...........not ours.
you don't disregard reproductive rights, because of 1 (or even many) racist cac.
Lmaooooo. Supreme Court just said fuck Climate change too.
We really need a thread for a list of the fuck shit they did the last two weeks.
Fuck America man