I agree, but it goes both ways though.
Ok, she's got him on ignore.......but there's also some passive aggression at play as well.
Case in point, one of her "Where do you rank them" threads that featured
@King Freeman .
That whole situation is funny and foul at the same time.
I mean, how do you put somebody on ignore.......make a thread about them...... and all the while knowing full well that they can't make any posts in that thread because you have them on ignore?
View attachment 115152
You don't see anything wrong with that bruh?
I'm starting to think this was a contributing factor in him going at Kandy the way that he does.
Also, if I'm not mistaken........she has made some random comments about him from time-to-time in the Off Topic thread.
Now, if this was before she had him on ignore........it's fair game.
But if she's doing that shit well after she placed him on ignore......
Basically, if you're gonna ignore somebody.........you can't have it both ways.
It's not a 2-way street.
That means there's no interaction, no mentions, no making threads about them.........comments about them......nothing.
Otherwise, you give that person license to do the same.
Which I think is why Freeman feels justified in quoting, responding, and giving reactions to her posts.
Obligatory indirectly related Wire gifs:
View attachment 115154
View attachment 115153