Damn I was rooting for him too
JONATHAN MAJORS FOUND GUILTY IN NYC FOR ASSAULTING WOMAN
- Thread starter Loquacious
- Start date
DOS_patos
Unverified Legion of Trill member
Help me understand,
Why are the texts brought up , if it wasn’t about March 25?
Let’s say he out hands on her in the past, what that got to do with what he was arrested for? If he didn’t touch her when he was arrested, what we talking about?
Proving he touched her THAT night is why we are here.
Am I wrong somewhere?
Why are the texts brought up , if it wasn’t about March 25?
Let’s say he out hands on her in the past, what that got to do with what he was arrested for? If he didn’t touch her when he was arrested, what we talking about?
Proving he touched her THAT night is why we are here.
Am I wrong somewhere?
Inori
NAWF
They are trying to establish a pattern of behavior
DOS_patos
Unverified Legion of Trill member
Inori
NAWF
that he puts hands on his significant other previously.. sooo he may have done it this time too. That's what they trying to establish. Cmon bruh it aint that hard to connect the dots here
DOS_patos
Unverified Legion of Trill member
*Sigh*
Smdh
Freeman
Get well soon 🦉🇨🇦
DOS_patos
Unverified Legion of Trill member
Nah fuck that.
How so?
Them texts have no contexts, and doesn’t mention abuse. How do we know they were read in order? And what was meant by “it’s fake”? What’s fake?
Her saying she’ll just say “she hit her head” to get stringer pain pills cuz she can’t sleep doesn’t imply he hit her. Broad sounds like a pill head
Remember the night bruh got arrested, it was pills all over the floor. Sleeping pills and she been drinking. Said her sucked her and broke her finger and choked….all seeming bit true
Nah it ain’t over
Freeman
Get well soon 🦉🇨🇦
It's okay brother... You can rest now.
DOS_patos
Unverified Legion of Trill member
Nope,
No decaf for me.
Imma fight the hood fight
They out here trying to slander that man’s character .
I bet when they enter the evidence from London, they say charges dropped. But the fact he was in that position will get more attention than the dropped charges.
Maybe I will take a nap.
But I ain’t done
"Why would I tell them what really happened when it's clear I want to be with you"
That's a wild ass statement to have entered into evidence.
Could Majors attorney talk around what could be implied here? Sure and maybe it she's playing chess.
But most folks on the jury hearing that are gonna assume she was protecting him from an assault he made on her at that time, that's the reasonable assumption.
What is up with these dumb ass lawyers these dudes are getting, first Torey's lawyer and now this lawyer
Megan Goode better run
a.mann
Active Member
......and thus, ends the reign of Kang, Long Live DOOM
DOS_patos
Unverified Legion of Trill member
Yes, it is reasonable assumption without context during a trial about abuse.
But people should be able to see that without context anything can look like something else completely with something all ready dominating the topic at hand.
I rather say it’s over based off facts vs assumption of what it sounds like.
mike030270
Memes
I wonder if a domestic abuse conviction could be a breach of contract. I'd imagine Disney has clauses in contracts for imageDisclaimer: I'm not saying this is an official confirmation but there was a rumor out there that there was a clause in his contract that he was to be Kang and every variant which can explain why Marvel / Disney isnt or hasnt totally dropped or recasted the character. So take this as a grain of salt
Marvel forced to keep Jonathan Majors as Kang The Conqueror, leaked contract shows
Marvel Studios is facing a challenging decision regarding the future of their Kang-focused saga amid rumors surrounding actor Jonathan Majors, who portrays Kang the Conqueror.www.sportskeeda.com
Its an emotionally manipulative tactic and its nasty