Bruh, am I wrong or did someone in here say that the pic was probably taken by a photographer and the having a photographer there to regularly capture shit so they can post it on social media is part of how they live their lives? Isn't part of what ya'll are defending, their right to post whatever they want even if it seems odd to others and brings undue attention? I'm not a fan of dude and don't really know anything about him outside of the fact that he and his wife keep popping up on this board because of their social media shenanigans. Again, bruh, if you want to pull out your sword and shield and fight for their honor based on nothing more than the fact that you believe he's famous enough to not want extra attention, do you. I don't really care about that. I'm just saying that from my perspective, the arguments you're making in his favor side more on fanboyish beliefs than actual proof of point. We can agree to disagree.
On the second point, you refuse to actually address the questions I'm asking. You keep trying to assert that a negative opinion of Legend is wrong. That's not what I'm asking, and once again, your commitment to defending his honor when his honor isn't even really what's being questioned is part of why I used the term fanboy. There's no bias on my part. I don't give a fuck about John Legend one way or the other, but that's clearly not true for you. Since you can't seem to put aside your bias, let's take his name out of it. If celebrity A puts his life on the internet. Is it wrong for ABW poster B to form an opinion about A based on B's impression of what A puts out there? If B's impression is negative, is it wrong for B to express that opinion as a criticism? Maybe you'll be able to actually answer those two questions now that Legend's name is not attached.