lol I been ignoring most of these posts because they are point less, but this one was particularly stupid. The post said Lebron would be paid the same whether he scores 30 or 70 because "the team will be owned by the government." This makes no sense. For one, sports teams wouldn't be owned by the government in a democratic socialist country, which is the form of socialism most propose for America. In that system, only the things that are important for survival (e.g., food production, energy production, healthcare) are controlled by the government. Second, why would the team being owned by the government mean Lebron's pay wouldn't change based on merit? Not everyone that works for our government gets paid the same. People who are better at their job in our government absolutely get more money. The person doesn't seem to even understand how capitalism works. Lebron doesn't really get paid for his production. He gets paid for how much of a draw the team thinks he is (e.g., how much money they think the team can make from him). It's possible he could make the same money averaging 30 or 70 in our current system too. Hell, it's possible he could average 70 and make less money in our system. It all depends on how much money people are willing to spend to see him play.
You played yaself by missing the whole point and wrote all that for nothing
