After reviewing that election, no he did not vote in the poll.
Objection, this is active obstruction/destroying of evidenceyour honor if this is counsels question then can we start erasing posts that were alluding to things he never intended on my client answering?
in the future, only review what's in front of you. this guy is tryna pull a fast oneAfter reviewing that election, no he did not vote in the poll.
The proof is ap specifically mentioning @King Du, notice he didn't mention any other mods. On top of the cosign from you the site owner, that's pretty cut and dry evidenceWhere's the proof that he voted?
Again with the "what ifs"
The proof is ap specifically mentioning @King Du, notice he didn't mention any other mods. On top of the cosign from you the site owner, that's pretty cut and dry evidence
my client had no idea what election he was referring to until AFTER evidence was produced..
explaining what?The proof is ap specifically mentioning @King Du, notice he didn't mention any other mods. On top of the cosign from you the site owner, that's pretty cut and dry evidence
We don't see his name in the poll because the poll got remade to be public, thus deleting all of the previous votes. And you'd have to laughably stupid to think that "No mods will be voting in this btw" followed by " @King Du " could be referencing anything else but him a mod voting in an electionHow do you know that wasn't in reference to a conversation they had earlier? That @ could've been about anything.
Even more evidence is that, you don't see his name in the poll. Once anyone votes u can't unvote, u can only change who u voted for.
Yo just take this L fam lol
I was not, the defendant has a bad memory and his lawyer doesn't even know what the case is about.objection, i think it was clear from the jump that counsel was trying to confuse my clent on what election he was referring to...
We don't see his name in the poll because the poll got remade to be public, thus deleting all of the previous votes. And you'd have to laughably stupid to think that "No mods will be voting in this btw" followed by " @King Du " could be referencing anything else but him a mod voting in an election
objection!!We don't see his name in the poll because the poll got remade to be public, thus deleting all of the previous votes. And you'd have to laughably stupid to think that "No mods will be voting in this btw" followed by " @King Du " could be referencing anything else but him a mod voting in an election
Just you personally have no idea as to what is going on, doesn't mean that more competent individual are having any trouble understanding the case.explaining what?
no one even knows what your questions re or what you're trying to prove...
this is kangaroo court
either show evidence direct tampering to an election and my clients involvement and ask him to explain it, or allow me to cross examine so we can move on
it's your job to make clear to both of us what you're talking about...I was not, the defendant has a bad memory and his lawyer doesn't even know what the case is about.
The quotes speak for themselvesOnce again, with the "what ifs" , you have no tangible concrete evidence of nothing sir!
Judge! can i be removed from the stand now? @Judge_Judah