Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol but statistically the economy perform better when the Democrats occupy the White House while Congress remains comprised. This is why you see a weird mix of political action committees supported by both labor groups and investors siding with Kamala’s administration versus Trump. The business climate is expected to remain the same so that would allow for folks to plan long term knowing the grander economic agenda will remain at a standstill.
Trump with Republican led Congress may see a change in the general agenda and stipend investment in the short term. It is not that Trump will fuck it up it is that he and some of his supporters in Congress support economic policies not inline with the Federal Reserve Monetary policy. Federal Reserve is raising rates to use future cuts to stimulate in recessionary periods so I turn the Govt should raise taxes. That’s why I’m not mad at restarting the student loan payments even though I’m affected that will lower inflation so again it’s not Trump nor Biden it’s the Fiscal Policy passed by Congress as a whole.
Please understand that two senators and a handful of representatives held up Biden’s agenda. That is why other groups you compare the Black community to lobby Senators and Representatives via PACs to ensure if they can’t get their agenda fulfilled they pay the Congressman or woman to run spoiler.
LMAO
I don't answer the questions the way you want me to because I know what's going to come next. You're going to move the goalposts.
What I am trying to get you to do is stop thinking so black and white. There are a few posters that have challenged you to do the same
A perfect example is the abortion thread. No matter how many times someone responds to your question, you move the goalposts in an attempt to repackage the same question but worded differently
They can do something in both situations, but in neither situation do they have direct control. Also you have to consider It’s always easier to mess things up, but there’s no magic wand that allows things to be fixed once they are already messed up. All it takes is one person to ruin crap, but to fix them it often takes way more than the one person unless you the Christ. It’s more complicated than that.Ok.
Let's take the things that the President can control, see it won't be an all or nothing cop out as many like to say, let's unpack this statement.
A. The Gaza situation, Can the President do anything about this situation? Yes or No?
Inflation, Can the President Do anything about this situation? Yes or No?
LMAO
I don't answer the questions the way you want me to because I know what's going to come next. You're going to move the goalposts.
What I am trying to get you to do is stop thinking so black and white. There are a few posters that have challenged you to do the same
A perfect example is the abortion thread. No matter how many times someone responds to your question, you move the goalposts in an attempt to repackage the same question but worded differently
They can do something in both situations, but in neither situation do they have direct control. Also you have to consider It’s always easier to mess things up, but there’s no magic wand that allows things to be fixed once they are already messed up. All it takes is one person to ruin crap, but to fix them it often takes way more than the one person unless you the Christ. It’s more complicated than that.
Answer me this in regards to Biden's agenda
Did the dems have the house and senate while at anytime while Biden was the President?
If the answer is yes.
Who then held up his agenda if the answer is yes to who having Congress?
I see where this is going but I wanna know before I assume you try and say that the reason Biden couldn't pass anything in Congress was because of the Republicans
I wanna chop you down there and ask you did at any time did the Dems hold the Senate and the House while Biden was in office
I think they did but I want you to answer that question.
Tayboo answered my questions.
The Knight poster answers direct questions I ask even when they may be going against the grain.
I can respect that. Creates more dialog imo. But niggas that deflect, beat around the bush, act obtuse, waste time imo.
It's only you, rain that either deflect, act obtuse lol.
Rain finally answered a direct question, I think it's his first time this month being direct but look at what I had to do. Had to hold his hand and chop his legs off and he was forced to give a str8 answer. He even had to lol because I took the shit he loves to do away and made him step in front of the class and open his mouth.
In a debate you give direct answers to questions. If you're not going to do that, then why are you or anybody replying to the topic with nonsense.
I didn't say he can’t directly do anything, I said it’s not in his direct control. Which mean the president is not 100% responsible. He’s not even halfway responsible, but barely a slice of the pie responsible when it come to affairs of men occurring in foreign countries (allied or not) at war with each other. Same with Russia and Ukraine. I won’t comment too much on the Gaza situation as a civilian for that same reason since we have no idea what’s being discussed at the table with those country leaders and have no way of knowing what intelligence is what.In the Gaza situation, Kamala or Trump public condem Ole boy from Israel, can say that they wanna cut his funding off, but they can't directly do anything?
True or False??
So the inflation situation, Kamala can SAY she wants to lower inflation? She can SAY she knows that prices are high but, she can't do anything directly to bring down Inflation? Neither can Trump??
True or False??
I just want this shit to be unpacked so that it's crystal clear.
We like to sat Trump will do a b and x and Biden can't do so much.
I wanna unpack this whole process.
We got time
it’s a
Yes the Democrats did but as I have said those senators were compromised: Kristen Simena and Joe Manchin which allowed him to pass the Infrastructure budget touted by both parties as successful. Republicans outmaneuvered the democrats by targeting states and the courts as prioritized under Mitch McConnell’s leadership; so it set the game plan to challenge anything they disagree with again playing spoiler to gain concessions.
Let me ask you this you’re a proponent of Dr Claude Anderson. He has the plan of an economic multiplier by investing in a hyper speed rail connecting the major black cities in the southeastern US reigniting the local black economies increasing the local GDP. Do you think he would spend his time bitching about how much the democrats don’t like black ppl or how much Kamala Harris will do for Black ppl or is he lobbying and leveraging to both parties to progress his agenda as his plan will make republican govt in the south more attractive.
Fam let me stop you right there you are the person here more motivated to punish Kamala Harris and the Democrats than you are to progress your own agenda or that of your community. A politician is a tool and like any other a tool should be used whether you like the tool or not. If you’re not using the tool get ready to be the tool and that tool is usually a hoe.
I didn't say he can’t directly do anything, I said it’s not in his direct control. Which mean the president is not 100% responsible. He’s not even halfway responsible, but barely a slice of the pie responsible when it come to affairs of men occurring in foreign countries (allied or not) at war with each other. Same with Russia and Ukraine. I won’t comment too much on the Gaza situation as a civilian for that same reason since we have no idea what’s being discussed at the table with those country leaders and have no way of knowing what intelligence is what.
When it comes to inflation, if it has been determined that companies are price-gouging, price fixing, collusion, and it turns out that is a considerable part of the reason inflation is high in those industries, the president can do something to affect it, but again it is not in his direct control.
@Richdollaz made a great point about the importance of the president’s economic plans and tax plan aligning with the Fed Monetary policy especially considering the Fed is about to pivot and therefore Fed funds interest rates are about to begin being cut as soon as this week I believe which will also tempt a resurgence of an inflationary environment in markets once again if they mess up the timing of these cuts along the way. Meanwhile to have a tariff based economy with tax cuts during this would be insane.
Don't give yourself credit. I laughed because you're not very good at this
Ok bro.I have been holding back, but it must be said: Knock_twice is an ignoramus.
Ok bro.
I'm an ignoramus. Now what.
I'ma still talk my shit and raise your blood pressure over there.
Now what.
To the first question, As Kamala mentioned, legislation can be introduced that define what it is to price-gouge and prohibit it being done in essential industries like food and housing. One example would be limit increases in price beyond a certain capacity within a given period of time. Impose limitations on how many residential properties corporations are allowed to own and how quickly. There's too much greed going on. You can't just let greed roam rampant and unchecked. There's other industries that this kind of regulation already happens like insurance for example. Safe neighborhoods and healthy food are necessities and in a country like this shouldn't be things accessible only to the wealthy, especially if you're someone working full-time. Thank God we don't have to pay for clean air to breathe. (oh, wait...)Could you list the things that the President could do about the price-gouging, price fixing, collusion that will rectify this situation?
Second question:
What has Biden done to rectify the price-gouging, price fixing, collusion?
The fact of the matter is you black democrats are still the stench of this race.
All that p-ssy azz, yes-man, whatever you say boss attitude ain't helping. When democrats say jump - you say "how high". When they drop - you say how low can we go. And you bent over for they objectives without even knowing what the hell you supporting. Your problem is you need to get your facts together first and then speak.
Case and point: https://ablackweb.com/threads/the-global-climate-crisis.24131/page-9
A whole nine pages of fear mongering and crying about the "climate crisis" which ain't a thing. The main reason you all do this is because democrats spooked you and fed you this nonsense. That's why I literally broke that nonsense down and exposed it w/ your failed chicken little predictions just recently.