View attachment 58244
Basically means that if someone's willing to actually pay for someone to get banned........albeit through virtual money..........then the person being banned should get something for it.
Ok, maybe not the full amount........but a percentage.
Ban costs 50mil..........the person getting banned gets 10mil of that.
I mean, you're saying what I'm proposing doesn't make sense.
Well, how does it make any sense to allow posters to be able ban other posters just because they have a problem with them?
Posters should only be banned if they commit bannable offenses.
And this isn't about any particular situation, I just think it sets a bad precedent overall.