DOS_patos
Unverified Legion of Trill member
nope......It is about YOUR assumptions cause you don't know WTF was in the emails and texts. Yet keep saying what Kaep could've done with some shit that you have no idea of what it was. Kaep and his lawyers know what was found. You don't. So again prove what you said.
I'm sure you've bought something or ate at a restaurant that was highly recommended. After that you said to yourself damn that wasn't what I expected it to be based on what I was told.
You ever think Kaep and his lawyers reviewed those emails and texts and realized this ain't what we thought this was going to be?
i stand on my unpopular opinion.
and while i understand your analogy.......this is a bit different.
the what if is the problem....and they didnt want them out there.
cant claim innocent but want to stop something that can prove innocence.
i posted a link.....i choose to believe he could have hurt them. otherwise...why kap got up there talking about the owners were running?
if they innocent and it was shown in the emails and shit.......yea. it aint adding up.