Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

them scientific questions that always bother you.

VIBE said:
Big Bang = beginning. Because it’s expanding, we can reverse that, when they do, the Universe comes back down to a single point called the “singularity”. An insanely small, dense and hot point the size of an atom. A beginning.

There’s no other running explanation other than fun theories to try to unexplain the beginning. Scientists actually willingly admit they don’t like the beginning explanation because beginnings require beginners. They understand it points to an intelligent mind, so they play around w ideas... string theory, dimensions, big bounce etc
Click to expand...
His whole interview is a must watch but listen to this clip between 8min till the end

cc: @DOS_patos
 
If light only exists due to the motion of a particle, does that mean darkness is the absence of any movement? Or the absence of visual and/or measurable movement?
Is darkness absolute stillness?
 
Gene Parmesan said:
What if the Big Bang was the beginning after the collapse of a previous universe?
Click to expand...

Been saying this for decades. It only makes sense if we believe Newtons third law to be true, that every action has an equal yet opposite reaction, then if the universe was created as the result of an explosion and resultant expansion, then somewhere in time the expansion will hit it's equilibrium point, where it neither expands nor contracts, it will stay at that point for some length of time, then begin to contract. That contraction eventually will bring all matter and energy down to a one dimensional point, and the process will start all over again.
 
konceptjones said:
Been saying this for decades. It only makes sense if we believe Newtons third law to be true, that every action has an equal yet opposite reaction, then if the universe was created as the result of an explosion and resultant expansion, then somewhere in time the expansion will hit it's equilibrium point, where it neither expands nor contracts, it will stay at that point for some length of time, then begin to contract. That contraction eventually will bring all matter and energy down to a one dimensional point, and the process will start all over again.
Click to expand...
All cool,

but what is this force that pushes yet pulls once a certain point is reached?
or if it’s two separate forces which makes one weaker or weak enough to become overwhelmed by the other? Something has to give, in order to expand then contract.
 
Rubato said:
This is wild

www.giantfreakinrobot.com

New Study Suggests Earth Is Surrounded By A Massive Magnetic Tunnel

Is the Earth traveling through a massive magnetic tunnel? According to a new study,i is! Here's what we know about the study!
www.giantfreakinrobot.com www.giantfreakinrobot.com
Click to expand...
Wow!

According to ScienceAlert, the wild new study suggests that the Earth, along with the rest of our solar system, is traveling through a giant magnetic tunnel. The North Polar Spur and the Fan Region are two bright, large-scale radio structures that can be seen on the opposite sides of the sky. With specialized equipment, of course. These mysterious structures have been known for quite some time to the scientific community, though their exact role has puzzled astronomers for decades.

However, the new research suggests that these structures are actually made of, and connected with long, magnetized, parallel filaments, forming what seems like a magnetic tunnel around our solar system. The structures themselves have been known to the scientific community since the ‘60s, but they have been challenging to understand due to a lack of adequate measuring systems.
...

West and her team used various modeling and simulation techniques across different parameters to figure out how the radio sky would look if magnetic filaments connected the two structures. And they stumbled upon a potential discovery, which solves many of the previously unanswered questions. The team determined that the most likely distance of the magnetic tunnel between the structures and our solar system is approximately 350-light years, which is consistent with some of the previously made theoretical and practical estimates, which placed North Polar Spur somewhere in the 500-light-year range.
 
@Scandalust313

This part made me think we may have found the barrier between our solar system and the rest of them

Most importantly, this model seems to agree with other observational properties of the two structures, including their shape, polarization of electromagnetic radiation, and brightness. But the team isn’t done yet; they plan to perform more complex modeling with more in-depth observations. As laws of physics dictate, magnetic fields don’t exist in isolation, and further observations might help reveal hidden details as to how these structures fit in the brother galactic picture.
 
Rubato said:
@Scandalust313

This part made me think we may have found the barrier between our solar system and the rest of them

Most importantly, this model seems to agree with other observational properties of the two structures, including their shape, polarization of electromagnetic radiation, and brightness. But the team isn’t done yet; they plan to perform more complex modeling with more in-depth observations. As laws of physics dictate, magnetic fields don’t exist in isolation, and further observations might help reveal hidden details as to how these structures fit in the brother galactic picture.
Click to expand...
Dang...shame on me for not reading to the end. smh

Makes plenty of sense tho
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top