Welcome To aBlackWeb

The Official World Politics Thread



https://www.mediaite.com/tv/pro-tru...-god-instituted-government-to-maintain-order/

Pro-Trump Rev. Jeffress Invokes Bible to Defend Immigration Policy: ‘God Instituted Government to Maintain Order’

Reverend Robert Jeffress defended President Trump on Tuesday night in the wake of a biblical debate over immigration.

Fox News anchor Shannon Bream began by having Jeffress react to remarks made by Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), who went after the “dark ideas” of the Trump administration and cited “building walls,” “marginalizing” transgender people,” “not supporting DACA kids” and “ripping children from their mother’s arms” as examples.

While Jeffress believes Gillibrand is sincere in her faith, he also thought she was “sincerely wrong.” He even invoked The Bible in order to defend Trump’s immigration stance.

“To characterize the president’s action in this as ‘evil’ to me is absolutely outrageous,” Jeffress reacted. Look, Romans Chapter 13 does say ‘God instituted government to maintain order and punish those who commit evil.’ But to call the president ‘evil’ for simply doing what God has given him the responsibility of doing, and that is protecting our borders and protecting our citizens. To me, that is outrageous. And I think we ought to celebrate a president like President Trump then denigrate this president for doing everything he can to fulfill his God-given responsibility.”

The Fox News contributor slammed Gillibrand over the “hypocrisy” of her concern about the children being ripped from their mother’s arms.

“What about the evil of ripping children out of their mother’s wombs after dismembering them through abortion?” Jeffress asked. “Where’s the outrage from the senator on that policy which her and the Democrat party supports? To me, this is selective outrage on the part of liberals.”

Jeffress added that The Bible does teach us to “show compassion” but that needs to be a “shared compassion” and that while what’s happening at the border is “gut-wrenching,” what’s “more gut-wrenching” is “seeing children like Kate Steinle” separated from their parents after being killed by illegal immigrants.

SMH...
 
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/tr...se-gop-meeting-with-no-clear-immigration-plan

Trump Rants And Roars At House GOP Meeting, With No Clear Immigration Plan

President Trump visited Capitol Hill on Tuesday to meet with anxious Republicans who hoped he’d help them put out the firestorm he started with his decision to separate parents and children. Instead, he delivered a vintage meandering and bullying speech that offered little concrete guidance to desperate House Republicans about what to do on immigration.

Trump spent 45 minutes ranting to House Republicans on everything from taxes to his pending lawsuits Tuesday evening, according to members in the meeting, while offering barely any info about whether he’d support the specifics of a pair of bills that closely follow the President’s own policy goals on immigration.

The President did not specifically endorse compromise legislation crafted by Republicans in the House or spend much time laying out his directives on what he needs to end his self-created crisis of family separation at the U.S.-Mexico border. Instead, he delivered a rambling and, according to some members, barely coherent tirade that was short on specifics, even as he said he was “one thousand percent” behind the House GOP efforts on immigration.

“He said a lot of things. He said he supported the bill, I guess. It was very rambling, he talked about everything from the lawsuit to tax bills,” said Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC). “It was kind of hard to follow everything he says — it was like a bouncing ball.”

The president even took aim at Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC), who just lost a primary largely due to his past criticism of the president. After asking if Sanford was in the room, according to multiple members, Trump called him “nasty.”

“He was very ugly,” said Jones.

Republican members have been whipsawed by the President’s latest tantrum-driven policies on immigration and were hoping he’d give them more specific policy guidance — especially those facing tough re-election who are panicked at the backlash against his newfound policy of tearing children from their asylum-seeking parents. Yet the classic rambling stem-winder delivered by Trump left members grasping for a clear sense of whether he supports both of the GOP immigration bills they plan to vote on later this week.

“No. He did say he supported ‘the bill.’ He just doesn’t — he’s not specific, you know, he does things his own way,” retiring Rep. Ryan Costello (R-PA) said with a laugh when TPM asked if he’d explicitly endorsed the compromise bill hammered out by House GOP moderates and conservatives.


That left members grasping for a happy message of unity afterwards — especially since Trump has been known to change his mind and publicly attack congressional Republicans over legislation.

“He alluded to both [bills] at the beginning. But it was unambiguous, his support was we need to move this compromise bill,” Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) said.

“We finally have a president willing to work with Congress to solve this, and that’s what this bill does,” said House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) said.

House Republicans, like those in the Senate, say they’re hoping to end the policy of tearing apart families — “It is not good for anyone when children get separated from their parents,” moderate Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-FL) said.

One of the bills offers an eventual pathway to citizenship for the approximately 1.8 million undocumented immigrants brought here as children, and House Republicans are trying to hammer out legislative language to end Trump’s current policy of separating families. The second, more conservative bill, is much more onerous for immigrants who want to stay legally in the U.S.

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL), a leading pro-immigration Republican, told TPM that House members were “still massaging” the legislative language to end family separation.

The White House claimed that Trump offered his clear support of their plans.

“The President spoke to the House Republican conference on a range of issues. In his remarks, he endorsed both House immigration bills that build the wall, close legal loopholes, cancel the visa lottery, curb chain migration, and solve the border crisis and family separation issue by allowing for family detention and removal. He told the members, ‘I’m with you 100 percent,'” White House Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah said.

But he wasn’t that clear. And that isn’t a good sign for what Diaz-Balart called the “last shot” for Congress to improve the current immigration system before this fall’s elections.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/isolated-and-paranoid-trump-the-bushies-are-out-to-get-me

An Increasingly Isolated And Paranoid Trump: ‘The Bushies Are Out To Get Me’

As staffers drain from the White House and the bulk of President Donald Trump’s most trusted advisors depart, Trump is growing increasingly lonely and mistrustful of those remaining, according to a Tuesday New York Times report.

“The Bushies in the White House are out to get me,” Trump reportedly said about staff holdovers from the Bush administration.

He is also so devoid of human contact that he’s eager to spar with reporters even as he slanders the profession daily, according to the Times.

The tides do not seem to be changing either, as rumors fly about a chunk of significant White House players who are eyeing the exits. Per the New York Times, that list includes Chief of Staff John Kelly, White House Counsel Don McGahn, Legislative Affairs Director Marc Short, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah, and Social Media Director Dan Scavino.

Scavino in particular would reportedly be a big loss to the President, as he is one of the last campaign holdovers who has stayed with Trump since the beginning and is vested with the responsibility of running Trump’s treasured Twitter feed—when Trump isn’t using it, of course.

34680784555_d8c8a652d5_n.jpg
 


https://www.mediaite.com/online/rep...-in-viral-tweetstorm-i-want-to-punch-someone/

Republican Lt. Gov of Utah Blows Up on ‘Political Tribalism’ In Viral Tweetstorm: ‘I Want to Punch Someone’

Spencer Cox (R), Utah’s Lieutenant Governor, is over it.

In a late-night Tweetstorm which has garnered a great deal of attention on Wednesday morning (particularly in progressive circles), the Beehive State’s second-in-command completely blew up on what he termed “political tribalism.”

“I know I shouldn’t tweet,” Cox wrote. “But I’m angry. And sad. I hate what we’ve become.”

The Lt. Gov. added, “I want to punch someone.”
 


https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livew...-presidency-is-that-he-thinks-it-is-about-him

Sanford: ‘The Tragedy Of The Trump Presidency’ Is His Selfishness

Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC), a congressman who recently lost the Republican primary for his reelection bid to a far-right challenger, earned an entire Trump digression Tuesday evening, as the President veered off his immigration script to slam the lawmaker in a room of his peers.

According to a Tuesday Washington Post report, Trump called Sanford a “nasty guy” and made fun of him for losing his race before a stone-cold audience, smattered with booing.

For Sanford, the display was a perfect summation of his problems with Trump.

“I would say the comment goes to the core of why I have at times agreed with policies of the administration but at the same time found the President’s personal style so caustic and counterproductive,” Sanford told The Washington Post. “The tragedy of the Trump presidency is that he thinks it’s about him. The President has taken those earnest beliefs by so many people across the country and has unfortunately fallen prey to thinking it’s about him.”

He reportedly added that he was gratified that his colleagues booed the President for the “biased, demeaning and pejorative comment.”

“You have really big issues happening, and in that context, the President felt it was necessary to take time to say something pejorative about some member of Congress,” he told the Post. “You have that environment, with so many important policies to be discussed, and the president takes time to do that. It is symptomatic [of] how far this administration has drifted from important ideas and policy that really impact people’s lives.”

When asked why Trump has sustained such a vitriolic grudge against him, Sanford expressed his bemusement. “I have no clue,” he said and started laughing.
 
Back
Top