China’s Approval Of 13 Ivanka Trump Trademarks Raises Brows At WH
SHANGHAI (AP) — Ivanka Trump’s brand continues to win foreign trademarks in China and the Philippines, adding to questions about conflicts of interest at the White House, The Associated Press has found.
On Sunday, China granted the First Daughter’s company final approval for its 13th trademark in the last three months, trademark office records show. Over the same period, the Chinese government has granted Ivanka Trump’s company provisional approval for another eight trademarks, which can be finalized if no objections are raised during a three-month comment period.
Taken together, the trademarks could allow her brand to market a lifetime’s worth of products in China, from baby blankets to coffins, and a host of things in between, including perfume, make-up, bowls, mirrors, furniture, books, coffee, chocolate and honey. Ivanka Trump stepped back from management of her brand and placed its assets in a family-run trust, but she continues to profit from the business.
Noah Bookbinder, the executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said on Twitter that the recent approvals create “more conflicts of interest and more potential for using the White House for self-enrichment.” His government watchdog group was behind one of several lawsuits against President Donald Trump for violations of the emoluments clause of the constitution, which bars officials from accepting gifts from foreign states unless they are approved by Congress.
As Ivanka Trump and her father have built their global brands, largely through licensing deals, they have pursued trademarks in dozens of countries. Those global trademarks have drawn the attention of ethics lawyers because they are granted by foreign governments and can confer enormous value. Concerns about political influence have been especially sharp in China, where the courts and bureaucracy are designed to reflect the will of the ruling Communist Party.
Chinese officials have emphasized that all trademark applications are handled in accordance with the law.
More approvals are likely to come. Online records from China’s trademark office indicate that Ivanka Trump’s company last applied for trademarks — 17 of them — on Mar. 28, 2017, the day before she took on a formal role at the White House. Those records on Monday showed at least 25 Ivanka Trump trademarks pending review, 36 active marks and eight with provisional approval.
The World Intellectual Property Organization’s global brand database also shows that her company, Ivanka Trump Marks LLC, won three trademarks in the Philippines after her father took office. Two of them cover clothing, including lingerie and baby clothes, were filed on Feb. 8, 2017 and registered in June and November. The third, filed on Mar. 1, 2017, covers clothing and footwear and was registered in July.
Companies register for trademarks for a variety of reasons. They can be a sign of corporate ambition, but in many countries, like China, where trademark squatting is rampant, companies also file defensively, to block copycats from grabbing legal rights to a brand’s name. Trademarks are classified by category and may include items that a company does not intend to market. Some trademark lawyers also advise clients to register trademarks for merchandise that is manufactured in China, even if it’s not sold there.
Ivanka Trump does not have a large retail presence in China, but customs records show that the bulk of her company’s U.S. imports are shipped from China.
The brand’s secretive Chinese supply chains have been the subject of some controversy. A year ago Monday, three men working for China Labor Watch, a New York-based non-profit, were arrested while investigating labor abuses at Ivanka Trump suppliers in China. After thirty days in detention, they were released on bail, but continue to live under police surveillance.
Li Qiang, the group’s founder, said Monday that he hopes bail will be lifted soon and that the case will not go to trial.
Police in Ganzhou, the southeastern Chinese city where the men were detained, could not be reached for comment. The Chinese law firm that handles Ivanka Trump’s intellectual property in China also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Kelly Sadler Backstabbed Boss In Oval Office After McCain Comment
When President Donald Trump assembled a small group of communication department staffers in the Oval Office after staffer Kelly Sadler’s off-color jokeabout Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), Sadler reeled off the names of White House leakers–including her boss, who was standing with her at the time.
According to a Sunday Axios report, Trump gathered Sadler, White House Director of Strategic Communications Mercedes Schlapp, White House Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah, and Chief of Staff John Kelly to discuss the leaking problem. The door to the outer office space was reportedly open.
Per Axios, Trump opened the meeting by telling Sadler that he would not fire her for her remarks. She had said that McCain’s opposition to then-CIA Director nominee Gina Haspel didn’t matter since he was “dying anyway.” In another part of the conversation, Trump reportedly mentioned his dislike for McCain.
Trump then asked Sadler for the names of the biggest White House leakers, according to Axios. She immediately named her boss, Schlapp, who had earlier pledged her support of Sadler in the height of the joke’s backlash. Schlapp reportedly defended herself vigorously. Sadler then added many of her other colleagues’ names to the list.
and they aint gonna do shit.
Middle East Poured Big Money Into Trump World Over Last 18 Months: Report
Over the last 18 months, oil-producing Persian Gulf nations have poured millions of dollars into “building ties” with the Trump administration, ABC News reported Monday. In particular, the report looks at Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar.
Even before the 2016 election, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia were ramping up their courtship of Trump insiders.
Records reviewed by ABC News show that over the past 18 months those oil-rich nations have poured millions into efforts to build ties to President Donald Trump’s administration.
Now, the long-simmering conflict between the Middle Eastern Gulf powers has devolved into allegations of hacking, subterfuge and espionage, and it has burst into public view in Washington in recent weeks as the governments wrestle for an upper hand with the Trump White House.
Middle East nations are always in the news for American presidents, but Qatar has previously been the subject of specific scrutiny in Trump’s administration over son-in-law Jared Kushner‘s financial ties and, bizarrely, a lawsuit involving that nation, former Trump advisor Steve Bannon, and rapper Ice Cube.
Kushner’s ties to Saudi Arabia have also previously been a focus. And just this month, news broke about a meeting with embattled Trump attorney Michael Cohen, as the report explains.
Earlier this month, a senior Qatari diplomat confirmed to ABC News he visited Trump Tower during the presidential transition, where he was spotted on videos with Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen.
Ahmed al-Rumaihi “was at Trump Tower on Dec. 12, 2016. He was there in his then role as head of Qatar Investments, an internal division of the Qatar Investment Authority, to accompany the Qatari delegation that was meeting with Trump transition officials on that date,” according to a statement by al-Rumaihi’s firm.
And there are more ties.
Other well-known Trump insiders with business ties to Qatar include Rudy Giuliani, whose company provided security advice to a state-run oil company. Last year, Qatar hired a firm run by Corey Lewandowski, the former Trump campaign manager, as one of seven lobbyists in Washington to help influence the White House, according to federal filings. Tom Barrack, one of Trump’s closest friends, has had several business deals over the years involving the Qatar Investment Authority.
UAE has also hired Geoff Verhoff of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. A donor to Trump’s campaign presidential transition team, the RNC named Verhoff as a regional vice chairman in April 2017. Verhoff was one of eight individuals named to the RNC’s finance leadership team with Broidy – a group that also included Cohen.
Beginning in late October 2016, Trump campaign donor Richard Hohlt, through his firm Hohlt Group Global, began serving as a consultant to Saudi Arabia on legislative matters and public affairs strategies, according to federal filings. Between January and April of 2017, the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs paid Hohlt $431,254 in consulting fees. Hohlt was appointed by Trump to recommend candidates to be fellows at the White House and government agencies as a member of the Commission on White House Fellowships.
The bone of contention, though, isn’t that many administration insiders have business ties to these oil-producing nations, which in itself is not unusual. Rather, the point the report rests on the two points that the nations has been creating financial ties specifically to obtain influence, and they are attempting to exercise that influence to alter policy and use financial influence with Trump officials to affect the outcome of their own internecine dispute.
The UAE, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, among others, are in the midst of a major breakdown in diplomatic relations and engaged in what some refer to as a “Qatar-Saudi Arabia proxy war.” It is that dispute over which they are attempting to exert influence.
“Without provocation, the blockaders have spent millions in the United States to tarnish the reputation of Qatar. The goal of their smear campaign and lobbying is to drive a wedge between Qatar and the United States – they have failed,” Al-Thani added. The embassies of UAE and Saudi Arabia did not respond to messages from ABC News requesting comment.
Jon Alterman, director of the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic & International Studies, summarized the implications for ABC.
“What seems to be happening here is people are using very specific relationships to effect very discreet things on a very large scale, and making money,” Alterman said. “And the system is designed to be a system that can’t be bent for any individual and what we’re increasingly seeing is it’s being bent for a small number of individuals.”
Not all ties with the nations are favorable ones. Former Trump insider and fundraiser Elliott Broidy, for example, is currently suing Qatar over alleged hacking of his emails in what he says is retaliation for his anti-Qatari views.
Although as Haaretz reported today, Elliott, along with George Nader, have been the subject of a number of recent news reports alleging they were essentially selling their influence with the Trump administration and being paid in the form of huge consulting fees.
It should be noted that George Nader has been confirmed as a cooperating witness in the Mueller investigation.
Qatar’s money operation in the United States is not exactly secret, nor is it limited merely to politicians. They have a major propaganda operation that extends all the way down to spreading “anti-Israel and anti-American propaganda in U.S. schools”, as National Review reported in March of this year.
Qatar Foundation International presents itself as a beneficent charity, merely working to spread knowledge of different cultures. In fact, it is an agent of Qatari foreign policy, with the aim of influencing American schoolchildren to support the Qatari agenda.
It is that same machine attempting to peddle influence through Trump associates.
ABC’s report attempts to sum things up briefly, but the various ties, relationships, and consequences are actually extremely complicated. It’s worth investigating the possible purchasing of influence, but premature to conclude it.
Koch Foundation ups donations to higher ed: report
The conservative Charles Koch Foundation has significantly increased its donations to higher education institutions, the Associated Press reported Monday.
The organization gave about $49 million to more than 250 colleges and universities in the U.S. in 2016, a 47 percent increase in giving from 2015, according to an AP review of the foundation’s most recent tax records.
John Hardin, the director of university relations for the foundation, told the AP that the bump in giving comes from more professors seeking funding and the group becoming more well-known.
He added that the foundation has established a better relationship with some institutions, so that colleges and universities that only got grants totaling a few thousand dollars a few years ago now receive significantly larger amounts, stretching into the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars.
“We’ve had the opportunity with more and more folks hearing about us to have more and more scholars coming to us,” Hardin told the AP.
The increased giving is revealed after it was revealed last month that the Koch Foundation was allowed to influence hiring decisions at George Mason University in exchange for financial donations.
University President Angel Cabrera said in a letter to faculty at the time that the agreements “fall short of the standards of academic independence I expect any gift to meet.”
George Mason and the affiliated Institute for Humane Studies received more than $19 million of the nearly $49 million given by the foundation in 2016, significantly more than any other institution.
Hardin told the AP that while the foundation’s gifts are facing stricter scrutiny, the shift was really caused by “a handful of activists.” He claims those critics “find ways to harass and try to censor” foundation-funded academic work rather than question it on its merits, which the organization finds “deeply troubling, and deeply concerting.”
April Ryan accuses Melania Trump’s spokeswoman of creating an ‘atmosphere of hate’ after Twitter feud
A White House reporter who serves as a CNN contributor is accusing first lady Melania Trump’s spokesperson of creating an “atmosphere of hate."
The back-and-forth is the latest public feud between an administration official and journalists over the reliability of media. The reporter, April Ryan, has frequently sparred with White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders in the past.
On Saturday afternoon, Ryan tweeted a link to a story from The Root titled “Is the Trump Administration Running a Child-Trafficking Ring or Nah? Follow Me Down the Rabbit Hole."
The semi-satirical article is a critique of the ability to create a false narrative in the news. It builds from the recent reports that the Department of Health and Human Services lost nearly 1,500 migrant minors after they were placed with adult sponsors.
Stephanie Grisham, the first lady's spokeswoman, then criticized Ryan in a tweet by questioning whether it is "OK" for a journalist with a large platform “to retweet any headline you want, regardless of if it’s true?”
Ryan, the Washington bureau chief for American Urban Radio Network, responded by asking whether Grisham read the story and not just the headline. She also called out the Trump administration for trying to discredit the press.
“You and many in this admin work to discredit us in the press,” Ryan tweeted. "What happens when you all tweet crazy stories. Where is the accountability there?”