Welcome To aBlackWeb

The official COVID-19/Coronavirus Discussion Thread...aka I hope I don't get the Rona

Because outside of n95 or kn95 or better the masks the majority of Americans are wearing masks that offer around 10% protection against Covid. So by wearing cloth and disposable masks it’s hardly slowing any spread.

If the government produced its own n95 or kn95 or
something even better and gave them to the citizens whenever they wanted we wouldn’t be in the position right now.

Last month the CDC stopped healthcare workers from wearing N95 from one of the biggest suppliers of them because they were trash.

which supplier?
 

On Wednesday the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that healthcare workers must stop using N95 respirators manufactured by Shanghai Dasheng Health Products Manufacturing, one of the world's largest manufacturers of N95 masks. The Centers of Disease Control’s (CDC) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) also revoked all respirator approvals for the company.

preciate it
 
Screenshot_20210929-204233.png Screenshot_20210929-204305.png


Screenshot_20210929-205012.png

Screenshot_20210929-205414.png
 
Last edited:
Clip in the link:

Xavier Becerra, US Secretary of Human Health and Services, when asked if he's aware of the Israel study on natural immunity, states he is unaware:

Screenshot_20210930-180751.png

This guy was nominated by Biden to run the department heading the effort to end the pandemic.

From politico article on Becerra : "Becerra takes a back seat while others steer Covid response":
Screenshot_20210930-180351.png

This is one of the people u refer to when u say "trust the experts". He says he hasn't heard of the Israeli study....but y'all average Joe, non experts sure have.

Is he lying? Or is he incompetent?

Does this help or hurt their goals which y'all ultimately support?
 
Screenshot_20210930-203640.png
Sept 30 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge upheld the University of California's COVID-19 vaccine requirement against a challenge by a professor who alleged he had immunity due to a prior coronavirus infection, in what appears to be the first ruling on the issue.
U.S. District Court Judge James Selna in Santa Ana, California, said the university system acted rationally to protect public health by mandating the vaccine and not exempting individuals with some level of immunity from an infection.
More than 43 million Americans have had confirmed cases of COVID-19 and some opponents of vaccinations have argued that immunity from an infection negates the need for an inoculation.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said on Aug. 6 that a study showed vaccines offer better protection than natural immunity gained from prior infection, which wanes over time.
On Wednesday, a group of physicians who are Republican members of Congress wrote to the CDC to urge the agency to acknowledge natural immunity.
The lawmakers said if the growing number of vaccine mandates ignore natural immunity it could lead to labor shortages as people are fired for failing to get a shot. Their letter said such mandates could even trigger a security crisis because up to 20% of the military faces "separation" and many of them "likely have natural immunity."
Selna's ruling denied a motion for a preliminary injunction by Aaron Kheriaty. And while Selna said the professor at the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine did not show a likelihood of success, Kheriaty said he plans to continue the litigation.
He told Reuters he plans to use the discovery process to determine how the policy was formulated and to question the university's expert witnesses about their reasoning for rejecting his arguments on natural immunity.
The university did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Bill Berkrot
 
Back
Top