Welcome To aBlackWeb

The official COVID-19/Coronavirus Discussion Thread...aka I hope I don't get the Rona

All we know for sure that your less likely to die from covid with the vaccine and the symptoms are much more mild.

Theres no proof of it creating enough antibodies for us not to catch it ( that would make it a cure) or making it less transmissible. We know already that people that have already had covid or have been vaccinated can still catch covid.

If someone is vaccinated, and he or she catches the virus, the viral load will likely be quickly reduced, and so not only would the person likely not develop symptoms, but he or she will be unlikely to transmit it as well. So does make it less transmissible. Not any amount of viral load is sufficient for an infected person to infect another.
 
Maybe my information is incorrect but the vaccine doesn't make you immune to catching covid so I'm not understanding how he's putting her at risk.

So if you had two eligible ladies and one was vaccinated and the other was not, you wouldn't go for the vaccinated one, all else being equal?
 
If someone is vaccinated, and he or she catches the virus, the viral load will likely be quickly reduced, and so not only would the person likely not develop symptoms, but he or she will be unlikely to transmit it as well. So does make it less transmissible. Not any amount of viral load is sufficient for an infected person to infect another.

You're making this up.
 
So if you had two eligible ladies and one was vaccinated and the other was not, you wouldn't go for the vaccinated one, all else being equal?

I wouldn't care cause theres no cure for covid. My boy and his pops got vaccinated and caught it a week later anyway.
 
I know it's Wiki
View attachment 542228
You're considered "sick" when the viral load has surpassed your body's ability to fight it off. It's why you can come in contact with small amts of germs and not get sick because not enough to make you sick.

I'm not arguing what it is Im saying it hasn't been proven that the vaccines make the virus less transmissible. That's still being studied.
 
Packed with info:

The idea behind it is good. It makes sense to create fixes for things before they hit the population. We don't have the capacity to deal with shit tons of dead bodies. We can't bury them fast enough or cremate them fast enough and it would be plague shit all over again. That's why it important to find out where and how this virus came about.
 
Maybe that's what it is, maybe not. Fact is NIH and WHO didn't press China hard enough and took their word for it.

I could be wrong but it's a lil coincidental that over a billion in funding for gain of function research, which is possibly what led to lab leak, was just approved..now that the bag secured Fauci changing his tune.

I'ma eventually look more into that though.

C1ECC99C-D081-493A-8E8F-0E99F82121FB.gif
 
Maybe that's what it is, maybe not. Fact is NIH and WHO didn't press China hard enough and took their word for it.

I could be wrong but it's a lil coincidental that over a billion in funding for gain of function research, which is possibly what led to lab leak, was just approved..now that the bag secured Fauci changing his tune.

I'ma eventually look more into that though.
Who is heavily influenced by gates
 
I guess the Wuhan thing can go 2 ways. It was either leaked or it wasn’t. Then if it was leaked, it could have happened by accident or on purpose.

If it happened on purpose, whomever was responsible needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of national and international law, and I don’t care who was involved.

If it happened on accident though, and people seized on this opportunity to gain funding for vaccine and other R&D advances, is that necessarily a bad thing? Especially if they pushed vaccine effectiveness and safety into a new era?
 
  • Like
Reactions: B_A
Back
Top