konceptjones
The one between three and three.
You never stop a think that you're too emotionally invested in this topic?
Your gaslighting is insane at this point.
Your guns could be knives or bombs point is analogous to you fucking your wife's sister and when she gets upset, you excuse it away because it could have been her cousin instead.
What the fuck do completely made up scenarios have to do with the reality of the present situation? We don't have a knifing problem. We don't have a bombing problem. We do however have a gun problem. So what is your solution for that?
How do we both simultaneously preserve the 2nd amendment rights for lawful gun owners while also reducing the ability for wrongdoers to obtain guns rather legally or illegally? That's the question.
What's made up???
The fact support my question: When guns were far easier to purchase, and fully automatic weapons were sold in sporting goods stores, we did NOT have mass shootings on this scale.
That's not gaslighting or anything like that (you really need to look up the meaning of that word... jussayin), it's an actual fact. So then this begs the question: If you claim that "ease of purchase" is the reason we have mass shootings then please explain why we didn't have this issue when they were EASIER to buy AND had weapons legally available that could kill even faster?
That's not a question y'all are willing to answer... Ever. You'll dance around it, duck it, ignore it, but in the face of a fact, your argument falls apart and instead of acknowledging the flaws in your logic, you end up arguing around it.