Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

Breaking News School Shooting in Nashville

Inori said:
The method for sure is relevant. If it wasnt so easy to do... it wouldnt be happening so frequently
Click to expand...

do you really think it changes if you take away guns?

UK has a stabbing problem because they don't have guns.
Bombs are easy as shit to make 'cause the material sheets and instructions are all over the internet.

Do you really think someone determined to kill won't do it 'cause one method is unavailable to them? The proof is out there already: They will use another method to carry out the attack.
 
konceptjones said:
don't be doin' that. If they didn't have guns they'd be stabbing or blowing shit up.

fact is, they wanted to kill. The method is irrelevant
Click to expand...
Bruh you do this every time. And every time I ask you if you’d rather be attacked by a gun or knife and you say knife with some other fluff to support your 2A stance.

But bottom line is, when you marry ease of access with ease of killing this is what you get. You can’t make it harder for guns to kill, so the only other option is to make it harder to get them.
 
konceptjones said:
do you really think it changes if you take away guns?

UK has a stabbing problem because they don't have guns.
Bombs are easy as shit to make 'cause the material sheets and instructions are all over the internet.

Do you really think someone determined to kill won't do it 'cause one method is unavailable to them? The proof is out there already: They will use another method to carry out the attack.
Click to expand...
Guns give leeway to more cowardly behavior than other weapons do... thats why we had the dc sniper
 
konceptjones said:
do you really think it changes if you take away guns?

UK has a stabbing problem because they don't have guns.
Bombs are easy as shit to make 'cause the material sheets and instructions are all over the internet.

Do you really think someone determined to kill won't do it 'cause one method is unavailable to them? The proof is out there already: They will use another method to carry out the attack.
Click to expand...

I never said anything about taking away guns.

I simply mentioned if it wasnt so fuckin easy to get your hands on one - it wouldnt be so big of a problem.

Knives are way easier to get than a gun.. why is it that we dont see so many mass stabbings?
Cars might be easier to get access to get than guns.. we dont see anywhere as near the amount of incidents where mass amounts of people are run over at schools.
Bombs are "easy as shit to make"? news to me.. maybe I missed out on the last 5-10 mass bombings in schools
 
TheNightKing said:
Bruh you do this every time. And every time I ask you if you’d rather be attacked by a gun or knife and you say knife with some other fluff to support your 2A stance.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you've never asked me this but go ahead.

TheNightKing said:
But bottom line is, when you marry ease of access with ease of killing this is what you get. You can’t make it harder for guns to kill, so the only other option is to make it harder to get them.
Click to expand...

So answer this question: Guns were FAR easier to get back inna day. Why weren't there all these mass shootings back then? And there were actual, factual machine guns sold to civilians across the country before the '86 ban. Shouldn't there have been mass killings on a scale far worse than today??? By your logic, this country should have been bathed in blood and bodies, and yet...
 
konceptjones said:
do you really think it changes if you take away guns?

UK has a stabbing problem because they don't have guns.
Bombs are easy as shit to make 'cause the material sheets and instructions are all over the internet.

Do you really think someone determined to kill won't do it 'cause one method is unavailable to them? The proof is out there already: They will use another method to carry out the attack.
Click to expand...
www.quora.com

How does U.K. knife crime compare with USA gun crime in terms of incidents, injuries, and fatalities per capita?

Answer (1 of 10): There are 40,000 knife offences a year in England & Wales. Around 18,000 of those resulted in an injury or involved an intent to injure (the rest being people caught with knives on them illegally). Around 6% of violent crimes involve a knife, and 30% of murders (that is around ...
www.quora.com www.quora.com
 
mike030270 said:
This. So much of this. I strongly believe this is a huge reason why. Their lives become publicly known and people remember them
Click to expand...

And on top of being fake martyrs, at this point they feel there's incentive to carry out mass shootings. They literally see republicans turning a blind eye, thus giving them the greenlight
 
Inori said:
I never said anything about taking away guns.

I simply mentioned if it wasnt so fuckin easy to get your hands on one - it wouldnt be so big of a problem.

Knives are way easier to get than a gun.. why is it that we dont see so many mass stabbings?
Cars might be easier to get access to get than guns.. we dont see anywhere as near the amount of incidents where mass amounts of people are run over at schools.
Bombs are "easy as shit to make"? news to me.. maybe I missed out on the last 5-10 mass bombings in schools
Click to expand...

They're not easy to get unless you're a criminal. Then you just take a yard down to Sweet's spot and cop whatever's available.

This shooter was a teenager, meaning there's no legit reason for her to have had a handgun in her possession because no one will sell to anyone under 21 years old. If she's under 18, then she's not allowed to buy a rifle either. And with AR's costing as much as they do along with ammo, I really doubt she copped any of guns used legally (the handgun for sure).

So... She's already in possession of a weapon she can't legally have purchased (the handgun), my bet is she stole all of the guns she used OR bought them off the streets illegally.

If what I've deduced here is correct, not a single law short of an outright ban on all private citizens owning guns and confiscating every gun in private hands could have possibly have stopped this shooting.
 
konceptjones said:
Yeah, you've never asked me this but go ahead.



So answer this question: Guns were FAR easier to get back inna day. Why weren't there all these mass shootings back then? And there were actual, factual machine guns sold to civilians across the country before the '86 ban. Shouldn't there have been mass killings on a scale far worse than today??? By your logic, this country should have been bathed in blood and bodies, and yet...
Click to expand...
So gun or knife?

Granted people may be crazier, but there’s no way you’re making people less crazy. You can reduce access to guns though.

Agree or disagree?
 
konceptjones said:
They're not easy to get unless you're a criminal. Then you just take a yard down to Sweet's spot and cop whatever's available.

This shooter was a teenager, meaning there's no legit reason for her to have had a handgun in her possession because no one will sell to anyone under 21 years old. If she's under 18, then she's not allowed to buy a rifle either. And with AR's costing as much as they do along with ammo, I really doubt she copped any of guns used legally (the handgun for sure).

So... She's already in possession of a weapon she can't legally have purchased (the handgun), my bet is she stole all of the guns she used OR bought them off the streets illegally.

If what I've deduced here is correct, not a single law short of an outright ban on all private citizens owning guns and confiscating every gun in private hands could have possibly have stopped this shooting.
Click to expand...

There is a direct line between how easy it is to get your hands on a gun, legally or ilegally, to how often we see these type of mass shootings take place. Spin it however you like but theres no denying that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top