If you still have faith that Lonzo can be as good he was projected to be you gotta make the trade.
If you down on Lonzo though, its a bad trade.
Idk about Lonzo personally. Dude shooting like 50% from the free throw line. Its one thing if he could shoot but had to work on his range, Lonzo right now just cant shoot period.
Im not sure if a gaurd that shot this bad from the free throw line ever improved enough to be a decent shooter.
Yall dont wanna Lavine and end up stuck with a young Rondo.
Tough call to me, just depends if you still project Lonzo to be a jason kidd or not
Yea shooting and durability my only concerns but I believe he can improve the shooting. Dude is gonna be like a Draymond of pg’s imo
Do it all player with elite defense
I fuck with Lavine and think him and Zo would be a very interesting backcourt....but clearing 20 mil off the books and that flexibility is intriguing and hard to pass up too(plus that 4th pick)
I wanna be clear I prefer keeping lavine and adding lonzo but wouldn’t be bothered with this scenario either
Cuz I see what the bulls doing ,trying to put together a high iq team full of 2 way players(carter,lonzo,porter,potentially culver) and have mad cap space for the next few seasons while they have all these rookie contracts