juks
Active Member
If you still have faith that Lonzo can be as good he was projected to be you gotta make the trade.
If you down on Lonzo though, its a bad trade.
Idk about Lonzo personally. Dude shooting like 50% from the free throw line. Its one thing if he could shoot but had to work on his range, Lonzo right now just cant shoot period.
Im not sure if a gaurd that shot this bad from the free throw line ever improved enough to be a decent shooter.
Yall dont wanna Lavine and end up stuck with a young Rondo.
Tough call to me, just depends if you still project Lonzo to be a jason kidd or not
Yea shooting and durability my only concerns but I believe he can improve the shooting. Dude is gonna be like a Draymond of pg’s imo
Do it all player with elite defense
I fuck with Lavine and think him and Zo would be a very interesting backcourt....but clearing 20 mil off the books and that flexibility is intriguing and hard to pass up too(plus that 4th pick)
I wanna be clear I prefer keeping lavine and adding lonzo but wouldn’t be bothered with this scenario either
Cuz I see what the bulls doing ,trying to put together a high iq team full of 2 way players(carter,lonzo,porter,potentially culver) and have mad cap space for the next few seasons while they have all these rookie contracts