this is news to me
Disney+ Marvel's Spider-Man: Far From Home 🕸
- Thread starter Infamous114
- Start date
i'm pretty sure every movie started with a marvel logo
yeah, im not doing this with you
so spiderman isn't a marvel character?
fox, sony, don't matter, this the third cinematic Spiderman
just like they had mad different superman's and Batman's for DC... they've had their share of Spiderman's
get so tired of yall MCU heads acting like the MCU niggaz the only people to make movies
just like they had mad different superman's and Batman's for DC... they've had their share of Spiderman's
get so tired of yall MCU heads acting like the MCU niggaz the only people to make movies
oldman_Ghost!
If u Google who gives a fuck. My name ain't there!
Sam Remi's spiderman (1 and 2) were good.
according to ap and his video they were horrible, and he doesn't even consider them marvel
2000s AP would've agreed with you
present day AP wont for reasons i've stated in that thread
but it does matter
thats just like blaming GRRM for the last couple of seasons of GOT b/c the shows are based on his characters. He had NOTHING to do with the writing
i have no idea what you are talking about, i don't speak GOT
fine
dont you fuck with Walter Mosley??
let's say Sony had the filming rights to the books he's written
would you blame Mosley if the movies came out butt? or would you blame Sony?
you a smart ass dude, stop playing dumb
bruh......i'm not playing dumb
i consider the dark knight trilogy DC movies even if thy not DCEU, so why would i not consider the spiderman trilogy Marvel movies just cuz they not MCU..
MCU is not the end all be all of marvel movies, they just the ones that are connected....
all marvel movies are still marvel movies,
just like all DC movies are still DC movies
there wouldn't even be a MCU if not for the early marvel success of spider-man, xmen, and blade....
you stop playing dumb
Or shit you like at 15 just isn't any good to you at 35.
FTR I always thought Spider-Man 1 was the only half decent film of the trilogy.
and waltermosely had a movie, devil in a blue dress, it was good
james paterson had several movies, and they range from good to bad,
anne rice as well...queen of the damned was two great books smushed into one okay movie with a congested plot and dope visuals... but it's still an anne rice movie
james paterson had several movies, and they range from good to bad,
anne rice as well...queen of the damned was two great books smushed into one okay movie with a congested plot and dope visuals... but it's still an anne rice movie
oldman_Ghost!
If u Google who gives a fuck. My name ain't there!
I missed the thread..but Sam remi's spiderman along w toby McGuire were great...its what started all this off (comicbook movies) in the first place..
Spiderman 3 was of course wack, but I put that on the writers strike than on remi.
i feel like we're talking past each other right now, so i'll try this one more time
the previous films were NOT Marvel films. They were Sony films with licensing of Marvel characters
and NO, they shouldn't be considered MCU as they predate the MCU as we know of it today.
Nolan's Batman films, Tim Burton's films etc...should NOT be considered DCEU either
The biggest difference is those films all were produced, financed, etc, by WB who owns DC comics. Movies pre MCU were done by other studios that paid for licensing
But to your point, if Devil in a blue dress was wack as a movie, who gets the blame? The movie studio or Walter Mosley?
you said a whole lot...
the point i'm making is non-MCU movies that are using Marvel characters are still Marvel movies, they have marvel logo at the beginning with the little pages flipping, they have marvel movies in te end credits..
just because it's outside the MCU which is just a joint cinematic universe, does not mean it's not a marvel movie..
if it uses marvel characters...it's a marvel movie....point blank period..
dare devil, elektra, howard the frigging duck,, all marvel movies.....
spiderman 1-3 fantastic 4, venom, xmen, logan, all marvel movies....
they may not be MCU, but blade is still a marvel movie....
if it uses marvel characters and has a marvel logo, it's a marvel movie...
just because a particular director, or stuido, didn't make a great movie does make te shit cease to be marvel.... it's just not connected to the cinematic universe...
but at the end of the day, it' still all marvel
Inori
NAWF
I dont care enough about these lil semantics y'all talking bout right now.
Disney/MCU movies are vastly better than the other Marvel movies from other studios.. That's just a fact... cuz they actually seem to give a fuck about the characters and telling a good story rather than pumping out bullshit in an attempt at a cash grab
Disney/MCU movies are vastly better than the other Marvel movies from other studios.. That's just a fact... cuz they actually seem to give a fuck about the characters and telling a good story rather than pumping out bullshit in an attempt at a cash grab