Disney+ Marvel's Spider-Man: Far From Home

fox, sony, don't matter, this the third cinematic Spiderman

just like they had mad different superman's and Batman's for DC... they've had their share of Spiderman's


get so tired of yall MCU heads acting like the MCU niggaz the only people to make movies
 
Duwop said:
fox, sony, don't matter, this the third cinematic Spiderman

just like they had mad different superman's and Batman's for DC... they've had their share of Spiderman's


get so tired of yall MCU heads acting like the MCU niggaz the only people to make movies
Click to expand...
but it does matter

thats just like blaming GRRM for the last couple of seasons of GOT b/c the shows are based on his characters. He had NOTHING to do with the writing
 
AP21 said:
but it does matter

thats just like blaming GRRM for the last couple of seasons of GOT b/c the shows are based on his characters. He had NOTHING to do with the writing
Click to expand...
i have no idea what you are talking about, i don't speak GOT
 
Duwop said:
i have no idea what you are talking about, i don't speak GOT
Click to expand...
fine

dont you fuck with Walter Mosley??

let's say Sony had the filming rights to the books he's written

would you blame Mosley if the movies came out butt? or would you blame Sony?

you a smart ass dude, stop playing dumb
 
AP21 said:
fine

dont you fuck with Walter Mosley??

let's say Sony had the filming rights to the books he's written

would you blame Mosley if the movies came out butt? or would you blame Sony?

you a smart ass dude, stop playing dumb
Click to expand...

bruh......i'm not playing dumb

i consider the dark knight trilogy DC movies even if thy not DCEU, so why would i not consider the spiderman trilogy Marvel movies just cuz they not MCU..

MCU is not the end all be all of marvel movies, they just the ones that are connected....

all marvel movies are still marvel movies,

just like all DC movies are still DC movies

there wouldn't even be a MCU if not for the early marvel success of spider-man, xmen, and blade....

you stop playing dumb
 
and waltermosely had a movie, devil in a blue dress, it was good

james paterson had several movies, and they range from good to bad,

anne rice as well...queen of the damned was two great books smushed into one okay movie with a congested plot and dope visuals... but it's still an anne rice movie
 
AP21 said:
2000s AP would've agreed with you

present day AP wont for reasons i've stated in that thread
Click to expand...


I missed the thread..but Sam remi's spiderman along w toby McGuire were great...its what started all this off (comicbook movies) in the first place..

Spiderman 3 was of course wack, but I put that on the writers strike than on remi.
 
Duwop said:
bruh......i'm not playing dumb

i consider the dark knight trilogy DC movies even if thy not DCEU, so why would i not consider the spiderman trilogy Marvel movies just cuz they not MCU..

MCU is not the end all be all of marvel movies, they just the ones that are connected....

all marvel movies are still marvel movies,

just like all DC movies are still DC movies

there wouldn't even be a MCU if not for the early marvel success of spider-man, xmen, and blade....

you stop playing dumb
Click to expand...

i feel like we're talking past each other right now, so i'll try this one more time

the previous films were NOT Marvel films. They were Sony films with licensing of Marvel characters

and NO, they shouldn't be considered MCU as they predate the MCU as we know of it today.

Nolan's Batman films, Tim Burton's films etc...should NOT be considered DCEU either

The biggest difference is those films all were produced, financed, etc, by WB who owns DC comics. Movies pre MCU were done by other studios that paid for licensing

But to your point, if Devil in a blue dress was wack as a movie, who gets the blame? The movie studio or Walter Mosley?
 
oldman_Ghost! said:
I missed the thread..but Sam remi's spiderman along w toby McGuire were great...its what started all this off (comicbook movies) in the first place..

Spiderman 3 was of course wack, but I put that on the writers strike than on remi.
Click to expand...
ehh

i'll bump the thread
 
AP21 said:
i feel like we're talking past each other right now, so i'll try this one more time

the previous films were NOT Marvel films. They were Sony films with licensing of Marvel characters

and NO, they shouldn't be considered MCU as they predate the MCU as we know of it today.

Nolan's Batman films, Tim Burton's films etc...should NOT be considered DCEU either

The biggest difference is those films all were produced, financed, etc, by WB who owns DC comics. Movies pre MCU were done by other studios that paid for licensing

But to your point, if Devil in a blue dress was wack as a movie, who gets the blame? The movie studio or Walter Mosley?
Click to expand...
you said a whole lot...

the point i'm making is non-MCU movies that are using Marvel characters are still Marvel movies, they have marvel logo at the beginning with the little pages flipping, they have marvel movies in te end credits..

just because it's outside the MCU which is just a joint cinematic universe, does not mean it's not a marvel movie..

if it uses marvel characters...it's a marvel movie....point blank period..

dare devil, elektra, howard the frigging duck,, all marvel movies.....

spiderman 1-3 fantastic 4, venom, xmen, logan, all marvel movies....


they may not be MCU, but blade is still a marvel movie....

if it uses marvel characters and has a marvel logo, it's a marvel movie...

just because a particular director, or stuido, didn't make a great movie does make te shit cease to be marvel.... it's just not connected to the cinematic universe...


but at the end of the day, it' still all marvel
 
I dont care enough about these lil semantics y'all talking bout right now.

Disney/MCU movies are vastly better than the other Marvel movies from other studios.. That's just a fact... cuz they actually seem to give a fuck about the characters and telling a good story rather than pumping out bullshit in an attempt at a cash grab
 
OMG NIGGA!!!

THEY HAVE THE MARVEL LOGO B/C THEY ARE USING PROPERTIES CREATED AND OWNED BY MARVEL!!!!!

What happens when niggas sample music and dont give proper credit? they get sued.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top