This reminds me of the intro sociology where my prof explained the views of radicals who want to change the entire system at once and the structural functionalists who think too much change at one time is bad and causes instability.
Most people don't disagree with Killmonger, they just think he was too radical and wanted too much change and too quickly. Even T'Challa ends up changing things, but he does it gradually and in increments
let me explain something.......
radical is a realitive term.
he wanted to change it is all that matters.
he sees his people getting shitted on and wants to help them become above their oppressors. wheres the problem?
there is no such thing as change too quickly.
did our ancestors have time to adapt to their "new" environment?
did our ancestors have time to adapt to how they was being stolen , sold and raped?
but when someone wants to make things right for us....its too quick?
nigga please.
tchalla didnt want change slow....he sold out his people.
at least his dad wanted only for his.
tchalla gave away the house...to the oppressor.
how you get a bag of guns and share it with the oppressors who you need the guns for?
increments my ass.
this is a get down or lay down type thing