Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

Male Trans Activist Says Women Don’t Own Womanhood or Periods

SneakDZA said:
So you don't want to talk about getting banned and making dozens of aliases and cyberstalking and being an all around creep and threatening to do revenge porn and release a female poster's phone number and address?

Ok... gotcha.
Click to expand...
We can speak truth to power, but you're not interested in the truth, you're interested in what gets reactions..

You can deflect from you being an assimilated negro who conforms to the whims of gay white people all you want. My internet past dont compare to your dickeating present.

You're exactly what they want all black men to be. Obedient.
 
Disanthrope said:
We can speak truth to power, but you're not interested in the truth, you're interested in what gets reactions..

You can deflect from you being an assimilated negro who conforms to the whims of gay white people all you want. My internet past dont compare to your dickeating present.

You're exactly what they want all black men to be. Obedient.
Click to expand...

Hey you're the one that brought up people being banned and making aliases so you can see why I thought that was something you wanted to talk about. But then I guess you thought that shit through.

But if you really want to keep doing this I'm more than happy to oblige. Post receipts of me making aliases and begging for my account to get unbanned and I'll do the same for you.
 
SneakDZA said:
Hey you're the one that brought up people being banned and making aliases so you can see why I thought that was something you wanted to talk about. But then I guess you thought that shit through.

But if you really want to keep doing this I'm more than happy to oblige. Post receipts of me making aliases and begging for my account to get unbanned and I'll do the same for you.
Click to expand...

Look..you keep deflecting from the topic. This a topic of consequence in our society. Nothing I've done on the internet matters sneak.

You on the other hand, are enabling white supremacy.

You are going along with shit that will soon be punishable if you don't go along with it. A whole white woman knows its bullshit, but your goofy safe ass doesn't. You out here pushing agendas that don't benefit you because you're conditioned. White culture has too much influence on you.... how about you put "Reparations" or "police reform now" in your profile? Ya know, something that actually benefits YOU and people who look like you..
 
1690738546008.png

You literally brought this shit up. Now that you know you're about to get smoked you want to change the subject.

Don't project your weird shit on me, creep. In fact... don't reply @ or engage with me and we can all live in peace and harmony.
 
Golan said:
What's the endgame?
Click to expand...
Short answer: left wing white supremacy.

Longer: The NORMALIZATION of this bullshit. Pronouns and trans/cisgender categories on applications, paperwork and maybe your mf driver's license. Democrat legislation that PUNISHES those who don't play along. Trannies having more privileges than black citizens. The further marginalization of real women, especially sisters. I could go on....
 
Golan said:
What's the endgame?
Click to expand...

Disanthrope said:
Short answer: left wing white supremacy.

Longer: The NORMALIZATION of this bullshit. Pronouns and trans/cisgender categories on applications, paperwork and maybe your mf driver's license. Democrat legislation that PUNISHES those who don't play along. Trannies having more privileges than black citizens. The further marginalization of real women, especially sisters. I could go on....
Click to expand...


Oprah there it is clip.gif
 
deadeye said:
www.nbcnews.com

Bud Light sales plunged after boycott over campaign with transgender influencer, company reveals

The world’s largest brewer said Thursday that revenue in the United States declined by 10.5% in the April-to-June period from a year earlier.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com




View attachment 1148214
Click to expand...

I'm not really sure what your motivation for posting that. I just want to point out that the reason Bud Light lost all that money is because Rep. politicians, celebrities, and other bigots pushed for a boycott just because the company sent a can to a trans woman in an effort to extend its customer base. Regardless of how you feel about trans people, all reasonable people should be able to agree that boycotting a company solely for using someone you don't like for promotion is stupid.
 
The Lonious Monk said:
I'm not really sure what your motivation for posting that. I just want to point out that the reason Bud Light lost all that money is because Rep. politicians, celebrities, and other bigots pushed for a boycott just because the company sent a can to a trans woman in an effort to extend its customer base. Regardless of how you feel about trans people, all reasonable people should be able to agree that boycotting a company solely for using someone you don't like for promotion is stupid.
Click to expand...



*shrugs*

Like the lgbt's boycotting Chick-Fil-A/Dan Cathy??
 
IUTpt2 said:
*shrugs*

Like the lgbt's boycotting Chick-Fil-A/Dan Cathy??
Click to expand...

That's a little different. My understanding is that the LBGTQ community wanted to boycott CFA because of financial ties between the owner and anti-LBGTQ groups. So in their minds, giving money to CFA was potentially funding people that were trying to hurt them.

That's different than bigots boycotting a company because they don't like that company using someone they hate as a representative.
 
The Lonious Monk said:
That's a little different. My understanding is that the LBGTQ community wanted to boycott CFA because of financial ties between the owner and anti-LBGTQ groups. So in their minds, giving money to CFA was potentially funding people that were trying to hurt them.

That's different than bigots boycotting a company because they don't like that company using someone they hate as a representative.
Click to expand...



They was boycotting Cathy/Chick-Fil-A due to statements he made on a radio show. And they weren't all that "anti-lgbt" statements.
 
IUTpt2 said:
They was boycotting Cathy/Chick-Fil-A due to statements he made on a radio show. And they weren't all that "anti-lgbt" statements.
Click to expand...

That's how it was reported, but that wasn't actually the reason for the boycott. Gays didn't like his comments, but they boycotted because he was giving contributions to Christian organizations that were actively opposing gays getting the right to marry.
 
The Lonious Monk said:
That's how it was reported, but that wasn't actually the reason for the boycott. Gays didn't like his comments, but they boycotted because he was giving contributions to Christian organizations that were actively opposing gays getting the right to marry.
Click to expand...



Hmm. Sure was.


You may be accurate tho and I'm not gonna call you a liar.







But Dan Cathy, president of the popular fast food chain Chick-fil-A, has done just that, saying on a radio show that "we're inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage. And I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude that thinks we have the audacity to redefine what marriage is all about."


Following backlash after those remarks, Cathy then told the Baptist Press in an article posted July 16 that he is "guilty as charged" and is very "supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit."

Reaction has been fierce and swift. Bloggers sounded off. Celebrities promised to boycott Chick-fil-A. Fans of the company reacted on Twitter and Facebook with everything from support to disgust.







In 2012, former Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy spoke out against America’s legalization of same-sex marriage, which sparked boycotts from the left.
 
IUTpt2 said:
Hmm. Sure was.


You may be accurate tho and I'm not gonna call you a liar.







But Dan Cathy, president of the popular fast food chain Chick-fil-A, has done just that, saying on a radio show that "we're inviting God's judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage. And I pray God's mercy on our generation that has such a prideful, arrogant attitude that thinks we have the audacity to redefine what marriage is all about."


Following backlash after those remarks, Cathy then told the Baptist Press in an article posted July 16 that he is "guilty as charged" and is very "supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit."

Reaction has been fierce and swift. Bloggers sounded off. Celebrities promised to boycott Chick-fil-A. Fans of the company reacted on Twitter and Facebook with everything from support to disgust.







In 2012, former Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy spoke out against America’s legalization of same-sex marriage, which sparked boycotts from the left.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know what you mean. I just remember having a discussion around that time with a gay coworker that was boycotting, and she showed me the real reason. It still wasn't enough to make me boycott, but I understood their reasoning better.
 
The Lonious Monk said:
That's a little different. My understanding is that the LBGTQ community wanted to boycott CFA because of financial ties between the owner and anti-LBGTQ groups. So in their minds, giving money to CFA was potentially funding people that were trying to hurt them.

That's different than bigots boycotting a company because they don't like that company using someone they hate as a representative.
Click to expand...

"Hate" is probably not the right word here.

Every time someone disagrees with the alphabet community or voices any amount of criticism towards them that doesn't mean "hatred". That's why it's so hard to have a dialogue with them because they've made it so everything is framed as "hate" off rip.
 
konceptjones said:
"Hate" is probably not the right word here.

Every time someone disagrees with the alphabet community or voices any amount of criticism towards them that doesn't mean "hatred". That's why it's so hard to have a dialogue with them because they've made it so everything is framed as "hate" off rip.
Click to expand...

I'm talking about people that literally hate trans people though. Like buying a case of bud light just so you can shoot it with a gun as a sign of your distate for the company simply acknowledging that trans people exist is not indicative of a simple disagreement. The people that do shit like that just don't like LBGTQ people and are against anything and anyone that doesn't share their sentiments.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top