It’s cheaper to keep her: Jesse Williams To Pay $100K a Month in Spousal & Child Support…
- Thread starter StringerBell
- Start date
Allah_U_Akbar
New Member
Soooo.... Does that mean she can just quit her job and live off her ex husband's earnings and never have to work again for the rest of her life?
When do the payments stop, if ever?
School me.
When do the payments stop, if ever?
School me.
Allah_U_Akbar
New Member
At what point does she hafta start earning a paycheck of her own, if ever?
Allah_U_Akbar
New Member
You know what?
I'm starting to get heated thinking about this.
I'm starting to get heated thinking about this.
No
Black_Samson
OG
Yall act like a sizeable chunk of that aint finna go to tuition, an HOA, food and clothes.
He lucky this aint happen in Texas.
He lucky this aint happen in Texas.
Loch121
OG
He should have brought his new whitegirl and said "see I'm not that pro black"
Dwayne
Not Like Us
Naw. He gon have to pay for school when it’s ones. None of that is going to school and lol at a chunk of 100k a month going to food and clothes.
Kzzl
Active Member
The "accustomed to a certain lifestyle" seems like a lie here. Nobody needs 100k a month to live. How much of that is the government getting a cut of? I'm certain they get a piece somewhere, they always do. So that's also years of income the government is getting on top of all the other shit they've got their hands in. 100k as one lump sum sounds far more reasonable in a situation like this.
Saying your ex should support you for years after a divorce sounds ridiculous. Regardless of the reason the marriage ended. Y'all took a gamble and it failed. Dust yourself off and keep it moving like everything else in life.
Saying your ex should support you for years after a divorce sounds ridiculous. Regardless of the reason the marriage ended. Y'all took a gamble and it failed. Dust yourself off and keep it moving like everything else in life.
LurkerSix
OG
I've seen this said a lot of times, but what exactly does this mean? Me personally, im not to give no one props because they acted like a decent human while their spouse was trying to make it in a particular field. And did it come out why the split? I figured one of them drastically changed when the money and fame came in.
it means, if he was afforded the opportunity to go out to casting calls while not bringing in any income, and she was not only the sole bread winner but she took primary responsibility of the kids...how do you assign a price to that in the event it goes sour?
Kzzl
Active Member
So all that 100k isn't getting taxed? No acronyms on the check stub?
If we're talking support as in partners of a business then that's different. If there's hard evidence of transactions that justifiably should be reimbursed, sure, pay it.
But if you're talking support in spirit, that doesn't matter. That's a moral issue that a person is within their right to honor or ignore. Not something that a court should put a price on. The relationship is over, there are no further obligations. Saying that one needs to pay the other for X amount of years "just because" is just greed.
Again, it goes back to how much of a monetary value you place on your contributions to the relationship
I don't think there is a concrete way you can because how do you determine what costs what?
The Mad Titan
Active Member
They sure do get a piece. It works like this, the feds provide the states funding for cs enforcement who in turn provide it to the counties. The systems takes their cut off the top and passes the rest on to the payee.