The logic that u guys are using is that being wet is the past tense of coming in contact with water. So water can’t be wet because it can’t come in contact with itself. At the same time, ur justifin opposite argument. Because if ur saying water can’t be wet because it can’t touch itself, ur also saying it is wet. Otherwise why would touching itself make it wet....?
Because ur saying it is wet, u just don’t believe it can touch itself, to make itself wet...but ur agreeing that it is wet