So proportional contribution?50/50 is the goal and not to be taken literal
50/50 is based on the premise of give and take. Unless y'all in the same industry, somebody is gonna make more than the other person so it's virtually impossible to literally apply the 50/50 idea.
is his wife contributing in other ways, like primarily caring for kids (if any)?Nah. If you want to live a comfortable life we both going in.
My brother subscribes to this and stays in financial trouble while his wife keeps her whole check and blows it on dumb shit.
The kids are 11 and 15 they don't need taking care of like that.is his wife contributing in other ways, like primarily caring for kids (if any)?
If they care of the household (cooking, cleaning, etc) equally, and make similar income, then yes having one person carry all the financial burden doesn't make much sense to me.The kids are 11 and 15 they don't need taking care of like that.
bingo.Even proportional doesn't always work. There is no winning formula when it comes to modern day finances. Whatever works for the individuals. You just don't want one party to be broke and the other having a bunch of excess money. But I also don't believe in putting all of our money in one pool. I mean we file joint taxes so she knows the numbers but there is our account, her account, my account, her business account , my business accounts and our sons account and that doesn't include investment accounts. I pay the big bills and she pays the small bills. It works for us.
Both parties need a vision prior to getting married imo. True partnership > one head of the household.Head of the household is about the man with a vision for how his house will be governed. One of me like my mentors told me that as a man, if you don't have a vision prior to getting married, then you're not ready
The problem is us men marry, then try to get the vision which can create all kinds of issues especially if the woman doesn't buy into it
In ohmars example, if his brother and wife had an arrangement that his check pays the bills and her check covers the fun and discretionary spending then I don't see anything wrong with that but if she keeping all her check to herself, that's selfish af
I do, when y'all struggling to keep afloat and she's likeIf they care of the household (cooking, cleaning, etc) equally, and make similar income, then yes having one person carry all the financial burden doesn't make much sense to me.
If they had some kind of understanding where he contributes financially and she mainly handles the home, I don't see the issue with that arrangement.
saying "if you're a housewife, the house better always be on point" is very similar to saying "if you work all day, you better be rich", knowing full well there are people working 12hrs a day who still live paycheck to paycheck. unrealistic.I do, when y'all struggling to keep afloat and she's like
I have no problem with house wives but only if you can afford it and the house better always be on point.
I think that's s bad analogy. Rich is too subjective.saying "if you're a housewife, the house better always be on point" is very similar to saying "if you work all day, you better be rich", knowing full well there are people working 12hrs a day who still live paycheck to paycheck. unrealistic.
This in a nutshell. And I'll add house money is house money no matter where it comes from.Even proportional doesn't always work. There is no winning formula when it comes to modern day finances. Whatever works for the individuals. You just don't want one party to be broke and the other having a bunch of excess money. But I also don't believe in putting all of our money in one pool. I mean we file joint taxes so she knows the numbers but there is our account, her account, my account, her business account , my business accounts and our sons account and that doesn't include investment accounts. I pay the big bills and she pays the small bills. It works for us.
Bills can get paid and you can still live paycheck to paycheck, with no savings or discretionary spending money.I think that's s bad analogy. Rich is too subjective.
It's more like if I work all day the all my bills better get paid.
My goal is to make sure we have enough quality free time as possible. When I see the household stufffaloing short I just call the cleaning company. If she sees that I forgot about a bill she just pays it.Bills can get paid and you can still live paycheck to paycheck, with no savings or discretionary spending money.
Expecting the house to be spotless at all times, when someone might have multiple kids that they're taking care of 24/7 primarily on their own, is an unrealistic expectation if you wouldn't hold the wage earning party to the same standard.
you're expecting perfection from one and the bare minimum from the other.