Inori
NAWF
You don't know what I believe but you typed all of that bullshit to make whatever point you felt you needed to make.
You wrong as fuck... I'm glad you got it out ya system tho
Poll Face mask etiquette in 2020
- Thread starter GOAT
- Start date
You don't know what I believe but you typed all of that bullshit to make whatever point you felt you needed to make.
You wrong as fuck... I'm glad you got it out ya system tho
K
King Freeman
Guest
So say what you believe, prove me wrong or get off my back nigga.
K
King Freeman
Guest
Can't stand niggas that's always quick to tell they niggas they wrong but won't take an actual hard stance or prove anything. It's just someone said someone said. Lemmings.
mryounggun
OG
Na. In November, the show 'Explained' did an episode called 'The Next Pandemic'. they go into detail about how one is almost certainly on the way that that it's just a matter of time. Then went over the spread of other pandemics, like the 1919 flu and talked about SARS to illustrate how quickly shit is spread in the modern age.
But the REALLY intersting part is that they went into detail about what has to happens for a disease to go jump from animals to humans, why wet markers in China are such a likely source, and why exactly it DOESN'T happen all the time. It takes a pretty weird combinations of factors for it to happen, and those things just don't happen at the same tie very often.
Check that shit out if you get a chance.
Watch Explained | Netflix Official Site
This enlightening series from Vox digs into a wide range of topics such as the rise of cryptocurrency, why diets fail, and the wild world of K-pop.
www.netflix.com
FYI: I'm NOT talking about 'Explained: The Coronavirus'. That's an offshoot of the show that I'm talking about and was just released the other day.
K
King Freeman
Guest
Na. In November, the show 'Explained' did an episode called 'The Next Pandemic'. they go into detail about how one is almost certainly on the way that that it's just a matter of time. Then went over the spread of other pandemics, like the 1919 flu and talked about SARS to illustrate how quickly shit is spread in the modern age.
But the REALLY intersting part is that they went into detail about what has to happens for a disease to go jump from animals to humans, why wet markers in China are such a likely source, and why exactly it DOESN'T happen all the time. It takes a pretty weird combinations of factors for it to happen, and those things just don't happen at the same tie very often.
Check that shit out if you get a chance.
Watch Explained | Netflix Official Site
This enlightening series from Vox digs into a wide range of topics such as the rise of cryptocurrency, why diets fail, and the wild world of K-pop.
FYI: I'm NOT talking about 'Explained: The Coronavirus'. That's an offshoot of the show that I'm talking about and was just released the other day.
I'll check it out.
I'm always open to having my mind being changed.
Golan
🥀
Can you link the source? You know, to enlighten the rest of us.
Inori
NAWF
Aint nobody on ya back. You said you don't believe people can be asymptomatic and I disagreed with you.
Whether you believe it or not folks can indeed have the virus, show no symptoms and spread it to others.
I personally know some folks have had the virus.. symptoms and all... others who tested positive but didn't have any symptoms at all....some that had just mild symptoms and some that unfortunately passed from it.
So to just say "Yeah I don't believe it" seems a bit silly to me. Shit aint as black and white as ur trying to paint it
K
King Freeman
Guest
I never said I dont believe in the virus. Tf?
What I said is I don't believe people can be asymptomatic. You have it with the symptoms or you don't have it.
Inori
NAWF
I never implied or said you didn't believe in the virus fam.
Fact remains is that you can have the virus and not show any immediate symptoms and still spread it to others. Hence why wearing a mask is important... You happen to not believe that....
We can agree to disagree on the topic and keep it movin. I hope you and your fam stay safe either way
BRIAN B.
Shittypoobutt
lmao
you kno covid-19 isn't the only disease/virus where you can have it & be asymptomatic for a period of time, right?
don't wear your ignorance like a badge of honor
K
King Freeman
Guest
Can you prove any of that tho? Like I said if you don't have the symptoms of a disease I don't believe you have it. Prove me wrong.
BRIAN B.
Shittypoobutt
:lol9:
you serious?
mf could have herpes on they lips & no bumps cuz they ain't have an outbreak
smh
K
King Freeman
Guest
Does “Asymptomatic” Mean Without Symptoms for Those Living with HIV Infection?
Throughout the history of the HIV epidemic, HIV-positive patients with relatively high CD4 counts and no clinical features of opportunistic infections have been classified as “asymptomatic” by definition and treatment guidelines. This ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Abstract
Throughout the history of the HIV epidemic, HIV-positive patients with relatively high CD4 counts and no clinical features of opportunistic infections have been classified as “asymptomatic” by definition and treatment guidelines. This classification, however, does not take into consideration the array of symptoms that an HIV-positive person can experience long before progressing to AIDS. This short report describes two international multi-site studies conducted in 2003–2005 and 2005–2007. Results from the studies show that HIV-positive people may experience symptoms throughout the trajectory of their disease, regardless of CD4 count or classification. Providers should discuss symptoms and symptom management with their clients at all stages of the disease.
Keywords: HIV infection, symptoms, asymptomatic
BACKGROUND
In untreated HIV disease, more than ten years can elapse from initial infection to the first occurrence of an opportunistic infection (OI), an indicator that the disease has progressed to AIDS (Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adult and Adolescents, 2006). This period of time does not mean, however, that people infected with HIV who have not yet progressed to AIDS are symptom free. Existing definitions and care guidelines that categorize patients as “asymptomatic” may lead clinicians to ignore symptoms that are not directly related to opportunistic infections, but that do require attention.
In 1986, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (“Classification system for human T-lymphotropic virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus infections,” 1986) provided an early description of HIV disease, which included two main categories: symptomatic and asymptomatic. For two decades, these definitions have been incorporated into treatment guidelines that have informed clinicians in the United States and other countries in their care for patients.
In the mid-1990s, with the ability to treat HIV itself, many clinicians began focusing solely on CD4 counts and symptoms directly related to OI (e.g. diarrhea, night sweats, fever). There has been growing evidence, however, that HIV-positive people experience many symptoms that are not directly related to OI or CD4 counts, particularly fatigue, depression, muscle aches, and fear/worries (Corless, Nicholas, Davis, Dolan, & McGibbon, 2002; Corless et al., In Press; Eller et al., 2005; Kemppainen et al., 2006; J. Voss, Portillo, Holzemer, & Dodd, 2007; J. G. Voss, 2005). These symptoms often go unrecognized and untreated by health care providers (Hughes, 2004), either because care providers do not ask patients about their symptoms or because they consider the symptoms to be “sub-clinical”.
Siegel and colleagues (1999) reported that having symptoms, as well as their intensity, influenced decisions to seek care and have contributed to reduced adherence to medications, thereby increasing the likelihood of resistance to medication regimens and exacerbating symptoms. These factors may also reduce the physical and mental aspects of a person’s quality of life (Abel & Painter, 2003; Ammassari et al., 2001; Corless et al., 2002; Hudson, Kirksey, & Holzemer, 2004; Lorenz, Cunningham, Spritzer, & Hays, 2006).
The aim of this study is to determine whether there are differences in the frequency and intensity of self-reported HIV symptoms among three levels of CD4 count (<200 cells/mm3, 200–350 cells/mm3, >350 cells/mm3), regardless of use of ARVs.
That took me 5 minutes.
Lou Cypher
The Tokin' White Guy
Only time I've been wearing a facemask is when I had to go to the ER for a non covid related issue.
K
King Freeman
Guest
I been in the hospital every 2 days to get my stomach bandaged after a surgery I had 2 months ago.
Only time I wear one.
BRIAN B.
Shittypoobutt
Does “Asymptomatic” Mean Without Symptoms for Those Living with HIV Infection?
Throughout the history of the HIV epidemic, HIV-positive patients with relatively high CD4 counts and no clinical features of opportunistic infections have been classified as “asymptomatic” by definition and treatment guidelines. This ...
Abstract
Throughout the history of the HIV epidemic, HIV-positive patients with relatively high CD4 counts and no clinical features of opportunistic infections have been classified as “asymptomatic” by definition and treatment guidelines. This classification, however, does not take into consideration the array of symptoms that an HIV-positive person can experience long before progressing to AIDS. This short report describes two international multi-site studies conducted in 2003–2005 and 2005–2007. Results from the studies show that HIV-positive people may experience symptoms throughout the trajectory of their disease, regardless of CD4 count or classification. Providers should discuss symptoms and symptom management with their clients at all stages of the disease.
Keywords: HIV infection, symptoms, asymptomatic
BACKGROUND
In untreated HIV disease, more than ten years can elapse from initial infection to the first occurrence of an opportunistic infection (OI), an indicator that the disease has progressed to AIDS (Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adult and Adolescents, 2006). This period of time does not mean, however, that people infected with HIV who have not yet progressed to AIDS are symptom free. Existing definitions and care guidelines that categorize patients as “asymptomatic” may lead clinicians to ignore symptoms that are not directly related to opportunistic infections, but that do require attention.
In 1986, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (“Classification system for human T-lymphotropic virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus infections,” 1986) provided an early description of HIV disease, which included two main categories: symptomatic and asymptomatic. For two decades, these definitions have been incorporated into treatment guidelines that have informed clinicians in the United States and other countries in their care for patients.
In the mid-1990s, with the ability to treat HIV itself, many clinicians began focusing solely on CD4 counts and symptoms directly related to OI (e.g. diarrhea, night sweats, fever). There has been growing evidence, however, that HIV-positive people experience many symptoms that are not directly related to OI or CD4 counts, particularly fatigue, depression, muscle aches, and fear/worries (Corless, Nicholas, Davis, Dolan, & McGibbon, 2002; Corless et al., In Press; Eller et al., 2005; Kemppainen et al., 2006; J. Voss, Portillo, Holzemer, & Dodd, 2007; J. G. Voss, 2005). These symptoms often go unrecognized and untreated by health care providers (Hughes, 2004), either because care providers do not ask patients about their symptoms or because they consider the symptoms to be “sub-clinical”.
Siegel and colleagues (1999) reported that having symptoms, as well as their intensity, influenced decisions to seek care and have contributed to reduced adherence to medications, thereby increasing the likelihood of resistance to medication regimens and exacerbating symptoms. These factors may also reduce the physical and mental aspects of a person’s quality of life (Abel & Painter, 2003; Ammassari et al., 2001; Corless et al., 2002; Hudson, Kirksey, & Holzemer, 2004; Lorenz, Cunningham, Spritzer, & Hays, 2006).
The aim of this study is to determine whether there are differences in the frequency and intensity of self-reported HIV symptoms among three levels of CD4 count (<200 cells/mm3, 200–350 cells/mm3, >350 cells/mm3), regardless of use of ARVs.
That took me 5 minutes.
& did you take time to read it?
does it say they absolutely most definitely will or did it say they "may" & "can"?
so, my point still stands
good try tho