Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

FEATURED DIDDYWATCH: Howard U. revokes honorary degree

test

He did that or he ain’t did that?

  • He did that shhhhh

  • Nah he ain’t do that shh

  • He did SOME of that shh

Results are only viewable after voting.
The Lonious Monk said:
I think what you miss is that no one is saying that what he is suggesting is 100% wrong. Nobody thinks @deadeye is a creep because he acknowledging that Cassie might be out for money. The problem people have with him and you are that every time one of these situations comes off, that's your default stance. Like how many times are you going to ask "Why did she wait so long?" when it's already been explained to you why that happens? At what point are people here allowed to dismiss you guys as always being against women in these situations unless they have indisputable evidence that doesn't routinely exist in reality?
Click to expand...
So a legit question turns into being against women?

On a discussion forum?

Nuance and background and explanation has all been ignored here when posted multiple time because taking a stance to call dudes out and create a nerrative that seems so easy for others to follow is what you and others don’t get.

Add all that to the fact a person is multi faceted and can support something but still question too…..to me makes this all (my new word) disingenuous.

And not you but it makes others look funny in the light.

Now tell me a man can’t support women and think a few women may be lying,

Now tell me I wasn’t the first jn here saying I can believe Cassie, so that doesn’t cancel out me asking other questions. I want to see her deal with him. Said that too in here. I’m mad she didn’t. But again , how and why does it bother people that we question her why not?

Why take it as we question her intentions vs we want him in jail.

Or is it because the way people have it hard wired and can’t see different?

Can we stop with trying to fit shit in a box under false narratives?
No one here has a hatred of women. Let’s cut that out.
 
DOS_patos said:
So a legit question turns into being against women?

On a discussion forum?

Nuance and background and explanation has all been ignored here when posted multiple time because taking a stance to call dudes out and create a nerrative that seems so easy for others to follow is what you and others don’t get.

Add all that to the fact a person is multi faceted and can support something but still question too…..to me makes this all (my new word) disingenuous.

And not you but it makes others look funny in the light.

Now tell me a man can’t support women and think a few women may be lying,

Now tell me I wasn’t the first jn here saying I can believe Cassie, so that doesn’t cancel out me asking other questions. I want to see her deal with him. Said that too in here. I’m mad she didn’t. But again , how and why does it bother people that we question her why not?

Why take it as we question her intentions vs we want him in jail.

Or is it because the way people have it hard wired and can’t see different?

Can we stop with trying to fit shit in a box under false narratives?
No one here has a hatred of women. Let’s cut that out.
Click to expand...

I really need you to start reading and understanding posts before responding with shit that basically just ignores everything that was said.

No, asking a legit question by itself does mean being against women.

Asking that same question every time you enter a thread about a woman alleging an assault even though that question is answered multiple times every thread means that you don't really care about the answer to that question. You just want to throw it out in an effort to completely disregard the woman's allegation, and yes, if you have a consistent pattern of always doing that every time these matters are brought up, that might be a sign that you're against women.
 
Valentinez A. Kaiser said:
This shouldn't be overlooked.
Turns out 50 weren't even telling tall tales all them years ago if he actually came into possession of cassie in compromising sexual situations. How did it get "leaked" out though? Or was puffy the one who made and shared them?! 🤔
Click to expand...
Hoe ass niggas show they women like that. If he was really into her no one would see shit like that.
 
BlackRain said:
You ever consider people understand your pov...they just think it's wrong?
Click to expand...
According to who?

Having a different opinion is one thing.

Y’all try to say people are abusers for asking for proof of abuse. And try to make it make sense.

Y’all assuming shit based off limited or selective comprehension.
 
The Lonious Monk said:
I really need you to start reading and understanding posts before responding with shit that basically just ignores everything that was said.

No, asking a legit question by itself does mean being against women.

Asking that same question every time you enter a thread about a woman alleging an assault even though that question is answered multiple times every thread means that you don't really care about the answer to that question. You just want to throw it out in an effort to completely disregard the woman's allegation, and yes, if you have a consistent pattern of always doing that every time these matters are brought up, that might be a sign that you're against women.
Click to expand...
Against women, want all facts, …..again, you are staying only in one side with disregarding other perspectives regardless of what it “looks” like.

That’s like a nigga getting mailed by a pack of dogs , so he questions if all dogs are attack dogs. But all niggas see is he scared of dogs without wondering why.

You are smart enough to understand but for some reason you stuck.

Now let’s see how honest you can be.

Before the metoo shit…..why wasn’t this against women brought up or dudes seen are abuse supporters or taking a stance against sexual violence. This should have been a thing right?

Keep it 1000
 
DOS_patos said:
According to who?

Having a different opinion is one thing.

Y’all try to say people are abusers for asking for proof of abuse. And try to make it make sense.

Y’all assuming shit based off limited or selective comprehension.
Click to expand...

Sometimes based on facts you blatantly ignore. Sometimes based on your habits of having to create entirely new scenarios to justify your stances. Yes people can have different opinions. And yes sometimes opinions can be wrong. Nobody said you're an abuser for asking for proof. Nobody has said you're an abuser at all. What has been said is that on this topic you consistently take the stances you do. And you're being, your new favorite word, disingenuous if you don't see that. Either that or you're just dumb
 
DOS_patos said:
Against women, want all facts, …..again, you are staying only in one side with disregarding other perspectives regardless of what it “looks” like.

That’s like a nigga getting mailed by a pack of dogs , so he questions if all dogs are attack dogs. But all niggas see is he scared of dogs without wondering why.

You are smart enough to understand but for some reason you stuck.

Now let’s see how honest you can be.

Before the metoo shit…..why wasn’t this against women brought up or dudes seen are abuse supporters or taking a stance against sexual violence. This should have been a thing right?

Keep it 1000
Click to expand...

At the bold...Yeah you're an idiot...
 
DOS_patos said:
Against women, want all facts, …..again, you are staying only in one side with disregarding other perspectives regardless of what it “looks” like.

That’s like a nigga getting mailed by a pack of dogs , so he questions if all dogs are attack dogs. But all niggas see is he scared of dogs without wondering why.

You are smart enough to understand but for some reason you stuck.

Now let’s see how honest you can be.

Before the metoo shit…..why wasn’t this against women brought up or dudes seen are abuse supporters or taking a stance against sexual violence. This should have been a thing right?

Keep it 1000
Click to expand...

Nobody's ever faulted you for wanting all the facts. If you just came into threads and said "We shouldn't rush to judge. Let's wait for the facts." No one would fault you. Asking "Why did she wait?" is not the same thing, and that's what you're leaning on right now.

The fact that you don't understand why it took something like the MeToo movement to empower women to fight back against the bullshit that they experience says it all. That's all I have to say about this with you.
 
The Lonious Monk said:
Nobody's ever faulted you for wanting all the facts. If you just came into threads and said "We shouldn't rush to judge. Let's wait for the facts." No one would fault you. Asking "Why did she wait?" is not the same thing, and that's what you're leaning on right now.

The fact that you don't understand why it took something like the MeToo movement to empower women to fight back against the bullshit that they experience says it all. That's all I have to say about this with you.
Click to expand...
So ask how y’all want it asked or it looks crazy?
Gotcha

Who said they don’t understand why ladies need empowering? See again, you said that and implying I don’t see it that way because I saw that it can be weaponized , just like it was.

Is that to say some ladies don’t need it? Nope. But some used it wrong. Them ladies hurt it for those who need it. But nah, it’s impossible for a person to see it that way AND see it the other way.

That’s just not possible.


Yea, have a blessed day sir.
 
DOS_patos said:
No answer?

Cool
Click to expand...

That is the answer.
DOS_patos said:
So ask how y’all want it asked or it looks crazy?
Gotcha

Who said they don’t understand why ladies need empowering? See again, you said that and implying I don’t see it that way because I saw that it can be weaponized , just like it was.

Is that to say some ladies don’t need it? Nope. But some used it wrong. Them ladies hurt it for those who need it. But nah, it’s impossible for a person to see it that way AND see it the other way.

That’s just not possible.


Yea, have a blessed day sir.
Click to expand...

"Why did she wait" and "We should wait for more facts" aren't the same thing at all. But you viewing them the same explains why you keep ignoring the answers put in front of you.
 
BlackRain said:
That is the answer.


"Why did she wait" and "We should wait for more facts" aren't the same thing at all. But you viewing them the same explains why you keep ignoring the answers put in front of you.
Click to expand...
It’s many ways to get to an answer you know that right?

directly and indirectly.
 
mike030270 said:
This the same clip as before or a new one? How many times did 50 get pics of Cassie?
Click to expand...
Cassie should sue 50 for revenge porn. Especially since he saw said pics and didn't report it to the police. He willfully watched said pictures and didn't help her....he's an accomplice.

Get yo money Queen!!!!!


:think2:
 
DOS_patos said:
Against women, want all facts, …..again, you are staying only in one side with disregarding other perspectives regardless of what it “looks” like.

That’s like a nigga getting mailed by a pack of dogs , so he questions if all dogs are attack dogs. But all niggas see is he scared of dogs without wondering why.

You are smart enough to understand but for some reason you stuck.

Now let’s see how honest you can be.

Before the metoo shit…..why wasn’t this against women brought up or dudes seen are abuse supporters or taking a stance against sexual violence. This should have been a thing right?

Keep it 1000
Click to expand...

So you want things swept under the rug like the old days
 
DOS_patos said:
So ask how y’all want it asked or it looks crazy?
Gotcha

Who said they don’t understand why ladies need empowering? See again, you said that and implying I don’t see it that way because I saw that it can be weaponized , just like it was.

Is that to say some ladies don’t need it? Nope. But some used it wrong. Them ladies hurt it for those who need it. But nah, it’s impossible for a person to see it that way AND see it the other way.

That’s just not possible.


Yea, have a blessed day sir.
Click to expand...


Bruh if you really built a school for sex abuse survivors you can answer all your questions
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top