Soul_Rattler
Active Member
Is it just me or did Dr. Minerva look a lil thick in the white house fight?
Is this movie the Thor Ragnarok of the WW films where they wanted to go for a more light and comedic tone?
Lol well yeah but I just wanted to ask if this was them trying to imitate thatRagnorok was the best Thor.
Hopefully this is the worst Wonder Woman. Hopefully...............
Double Toasted dropped theirs and it was quite fair.Havent watched yet.
Im waiting on chris stuckmann to drop his review tbh
Didn't know this. The first Wonder Woman was awesome IMO and so I had high hopes for this one. Don't know why they'd change it up. Also didn't know Snyder was involved in the first one. Why not involve him in the 2nd when there's this huge outpour for his Justice League cutI once again hate to say something bad but on the 1st Wonder Woman, Patty Jenkins only directed and didn't write for it. The 2nd one she helped write and direct the film according to IMDB. Switching up the writers room wasn't a good look in my opinion
Wonder Woman (2017) - IMDb
Wonder Woman (2017) cast and crew credits, including actors, actresses, directors, writers and more.www.imdb.com
Wonder Woman 1984 (2020) - IMDb
Wonder Woman 1984 (2020) cast and crew credits, including actors, actresses, directors, writers and more.www.imdb.com
That’s if she gets another movieRagnorok was the best Thor.
Hopefully this is the worst Wonder Woman. Hopefully...............
Lol well yeah but I just wanted to ask if this was them trying to imitate that
but yeah to go from arguably the best DC movie and then make a horrible sequel it’s rough
they just don’t make great movies and after 9 movies they still can’t figure it out then it just doesn’t bode well for them
Imagine if after Captain America Winter Soldier that the MCU still couldn’t establish themselves with a solid foundation
Iron man 2 wasn’t horrible to pplLet's throw Du a bone
Ironman did it. Dropped a dope 1st movie, then absolutely shit the bed w/ the 2nd.
When you doing superhero movies in hollywood you always run the risk of having similar plot points.... But the wish stone being a mystical object that gave those powers is better than... angels...Hmmm where have we seen that before?
View attachment 428594
That would be a valid argument if Hancock wasnt 12 years old so it just come off as lazy recycled material. Look I really wanted to like this movie. First one was dope, this is a major step back.When you doing superhero movies in hollywood you always run the risk of having similar plot points.... But the wish stone being a mystical object that gave those powers is better than... angels...
It was the fucking Monkey's Paw!When you doing superhero movies in hollywood you always run the risk of having similar plot points.... But the wish stone being a mystical object that gave those powers is better than... angels...
Lol damn if this isn’t being biased and close mindedLike y'all griping about the wish stone.....
Powerful artifacts corrupting their users isn't so left field that it made anything bad per say..I dunno, I can't make y'all niggaz like the shit if y'all convinced you gonna hate it. But I will never agree this was a bad movie. And I'm convinced y'all choose to dislike shit at this point. Nuffin was that extreme to make this considered a bad movie. Little small nit picking things that niggaz committed to an agenda gonna push.
ANYBODY Who liked it actually wanna talk about some of the good things? I'm ignoring the negative shit.
I still think a smooth switch would have sealed the deal with cheetah. She was damn near perfect.