JohnSmithCAN
Active Member
lol you just had "oecumenia" in the tuck huh?
I don't get it.
lol you just had "oecumenia" in the tuck huh?
This is crazy ..
Like word for word in this Anne Rice FB group where they arguing Akasha being casted.
I think anyone middle Eastern is acceptable in both cases.
Gal from Israel.... And she got the star power.
I don't see an issue
What is a "black African" ? We are not the Smurfs. Africa is a continent with very diverse indigenous populations. We identify as "black Africans" today because the white man told us so. But Black-ness was barely a identity marker to substantiate our cultural ethos through for our ancestors. Some were "black" , some were "red" , some were "light" and some were even sometimes albino. The Berbers, Egyptians and Cushites are various hues of light, red and reddish black... yet, the former ones, the Egyptians used to qualify themselves as Kemmiu, "the people of the Land of the Blacks" , but more importantly as remmiu/remetu "free citizens" .
Who's Akasha?
You make a fair point, but it's irrelevant. My point was about how people describe her now. You're right that in the past, these divisions may not have meant anything. However, now Black and Middle East and North African (MENA) are considered two distinct races.
View attachment 379285
Character Aaliyah played. Similar background to Cleopatra. She was originally from Uruk, or modern-day Iraq. She later becomes Queen in Kemet.
People on the groups think she should be cast as a middle Eastern woman.... While many others want another black woman like Aaliyah.
I could see them doing a fair skinned Israeli in the AMC series like they just did gal gadot
Except when people gets confronted at the facts that the Berbers and Egyptians are more closely related to the Cushites than the Semites, Iranians and other modern Near East ethnic groups genetically-wise, whilst an African cross-cultural contuinity is still prevailing within these respective North African and Northeast African populations and sub-Saharan Africans.
As soon you mention either one of them, people gets cofronted to evidence some shared African cross-ethnic cultural root and white people won't get it. They only want the likes of North Africa to evolve outside of Africa instead recognizing that we're speaking about an ancient, very complex organism, not about an ethno-nation fantasy.
This is the same paradox we found between the Haitians and the Dominicans. Dominicans are simply Spanish-speaking Haitians yet they are persuaded to be apart from the rest of the West Indies, starting with a country only divided from theirs by some imaginary line in the middle of an island, traced out there about one hundred years ago by the Cooning bi-racial and white elites. Wxcept that given DR's proximity with the Latin world and America you heard more about how Dominicans slowly began to embrace their African heritage.
North Africa and its rural populations are too far away.
Well, her sister Arsinoe does certainly figure out within their claims.
You can claim em.
But they don't claim us.
The people that live in Egypt now... 4000 years after the fact - are just as close to the original Egyptians as the people that live in the USA are to Native Americans 400 years ago. Ancient Egyptians were not Arabs... that happened relatively recently in world history.
I swear we need more black archeologists and historians if we're ever going to correct these false narratives that people seem to base their opinions on.
Also Cleopatra was white. But who cares. She was a Ptolemy. She came in at the end of the Egyptian dynastic period. There was 2000 years of history before that. 2000. Let me say it again... 2000 years of history.
Let's hear some stories about Ramses II or Imhotep or Hatsheput or Pepi or Akhenaten or Tiye. The reason that never happens is because those people were undeniably Black African people.
Again, like I've said earlier half of the Egyptian population are native Egyptians. If you look at them, you would know that their indigenous background was likely alike-to-a-tad-darker because very few details about them suggests they are not native to that land. They're basically still the same: slender of built, proponent to get ample, average-to-taller in height, dark reddish brown to light brown hues, globular -socketed almond-shaped dark to green eyes, wavy to frizzly dark hair, thin or prominent noses and features mostly intermediary between the Nilo-Cushites and Lybian Berbers.
The sole differences are that they're now mixed with various other populations over the last 4,000 years, yet genetically and culturally wise they're still none only the closest descendants of the ancient Egyptians alive but also their direct ethnocultural continuity.
Again, like I've said earlier half of the Egyptian population are native Egyptians. If you look at them, you would know that their indigenous background was likely alike-to-a-tad-darker because very few details about them suggests they are not native to that land. They're basically still the same: slender of built, proponent to get ample, average-to-taller in height, dark reddish brown to light brown hues, globular -socketed almond-shaped dark to green eyes, wavy to frizzly dark hair, thin or prominent noses and features mostly intermediary between the Nilo-Cushites and Lybian Berbers.
The sole differences are that they're now mixed with various other populations over the last 4,000 years, yet genetically and culturally wise they're still none only the closest descendants of the ancient Egyptians alive but also their direct ethnocultural continuity.
So you're saying that in the first center of the civilized world the demographics of the population stayed roughly the same over the course of 4000-7000 years?
The Egyptians originated from a land called Punt which most credible historians consider being somewhere in area of what is now Sudan but possibly even further south. Sudanese people are more than just a "tad darker" than arabs. They are Black People.
If I really had to hazard a guess, I'd say the original Egyptians probably look something like the natives in the Sudan, Somali, and Ethiopian regions. Even among those peoples phenotypes vary quite a bit, so I don't think the native Egyptians were ever some groups where there was a common look across everyone that lived there.
Wrong.
The Upper Egyptians are quite outspoken about their ancestral ties within the rest of the African oecumenia and one of his most prominent scholars, an Egyptian American man named Moustafa Gadallah, is quite hostile about white supremacy prominent at both his birthplace and America.
Even Egyptian American actor Rami Malek, who's an Arabicized Copt often playing ambiguously brown or white roles in television and films, openly identifies himself as both a Black American and Arab American, then praises the Egyptian American community's ancestral ties within the rest of the African diaspora in U.S.A. .
Never said the contrary. I only gave a generic assumption about how ancient Egyptians used to be slightly darker in phenotype in comparison to their modern descendants. It never stopped the proliferation of a variety of color skin within the dark and olive spectrum, especially given the fact that the genetic code responsible of Near East Neolithic Farmer-inherited lighter brown skin in Northeast Africa and some sub-Saharan countries does originates from around the regions of Middle-Egypt and Lower-Egypt from the Protodynastic period.