man i send that little nigga downstairs when my wife undressed now....I dont mind my sons wee wee on my belly.
I mean the lil nigga came from me lol.
"fuck outta here kid......your mommy ain't decent.....wait"
man i send that little nigga downstairs when my wife undressed now....I dont mind my sons wee wee on my belly.
I mean the lil nigga came from me lol.
Let me explain...
i would not let my wife take a picture like this with my son.
I would not pose like this in a picture with my wife and son.
I think this entire picture is fucked up, and I would not do this with my own family.
They already dead ass wrong to begin with.
As for Future....you motherfucking right i'm going to be highly pissed if my son was in a picture like that.....i'd be ready to go aside all their heads, simply bcuz i'd never sign off on some crazy ass shit even if i was in it.....
yea she foul, it's a foul ass picture....and it's extra foul if future not cool with it.....
also i never praised that man for smashing pippen wife, if she was still married to pippen, he was dead ass wrong for that..... but he don't deserve to see his son ass in the media all unexpected either....
i'd completely lose my shit
man i send that little nigga downstairs when my wife undressed now....
"fuck outta here kid......your mommy ain't decent.....wait"
why? why would you be so upset?
is it the nudity? is it the lack of control? is it the fact your ex has moved on and is now happily married?
Why do I feel like this is not about the child or the picture in full but the fact a WOMAN moved on and found a man that worships her.
Russell accepts the child as his own and lil future IS WITH HIS MOTHER in this picture.
Im not seeing what is so bad about it?
ITS A MATERNITY SHOOT for christ sakes.
you aren't posing nude with your toddler son and pregnant wife?
why?...I legit want to know.
again, I feel like we are sexualizing the hell out of this picture which is weird to me.
it's just my personal beliefs on decency and exposure....why? our bodies aren't inherently sexual.
we are the ones who sexualize it and make it shameful and dirty
Got a whole thread up here of women posing in odd positions with their ass, coochie and titties out but a maternity shoot is wrong?
(Im not hating...I enjoy that thread btw)
But is it because the shoot is not for male consumption? Is it the fact a woman posing naked with her child goes against the vessel of male sexual gratification and entitlement?
I mean Ciara owns her body, not us.
And if she wants to share her body with the public, why do we look at it like a bad thing? or something shameful.
ITS JUST A NAKED BODY.
I mean she is not on all fours humping Russel while lil future rides her back lmaooo like come on.
Im trying to figure this all out.
Let's compare baby future's life vs his siblings 10 years from nowHow did you reach this conclusion?
I don't like when those shoots are made public either. It isnt about it being sexual. Maternity shoots are not sexual.I understand your perspective buttttttt are we looking at the same photo? @BNE
Nobody is exposed lol
A child consenting to a maternity shoot is a little extreme. This is not child pornography, this is a maternity shoot.
I mean.....
1. hes nude but you cant see anything. NOTHING. not even his baby butt
2. its a maternity shoot
3. there is nothing shameful about the human body.
4. people do these kinds of shoots all the time.
View attachment 2716 View attachment 2717
5. is it because Cee Cee is famous?
Im just trying to understand the issue. lol
I don't like when those shoots are made public either. It isnt about it being sexual. Maternity shoots are not sexual.
Broadcasting images of your child to the whole world unnecessarily doesn't sit well with me. I get that she can't prevent that because she's a celebrity and her family will be papped n so on. His being unclothed in a picture released *for public consumption* makes it huge a violation of his privacy imo. I believe in bodily autonomy. As his guardian, she should be shielding that not violating it herself.
You can be famous n not release every single thing to the public, esp if it involves a kid.
I get that we're in an age of broadcasting shit about yourself. but why did the kid need to be used in a picture shared with the whole world?
why couldn't this hang in their living room?
what is the release of this photograph accomplishing and what does the aim have to do with the kid? I hope they aren't capitalizing off of this image but if they aren't that's even more puzzling.
yeah. i get that it's probably not a transgression to most because SO much is shared on social media tht this isn't much of a step by comparison but it's a step too far in my eyes.Ah I see. Ok I understand
I also understand that not everyone is comfortable with nudity or posting their family around social media land, which is perfectly ok.
I get it.