Welcome To aBlackWeb

COMMUNITY ABW Oversight Commission

Status
Not open for further replies.
When the shit first went down, I wanted Love gone. There's a function on here that bans people without fully banning people, that's what happened to her.

She recently popped back up begging to be let back, one of the mods rode hard for her and I was outvoted on letting her back.

After the thread was upped by Kandy cuz she wasn't around when it first went down, it reopened the can of worms. Love again had a chance to clear her name, more fuckery ensued and I officially banned her.


No more, No less.

u see the lack of uniformity though...if you as the boss soft banned her then let her back why should she have to clear her name to Kandy?
 
Again... you don't understand the discussion or the issues at hand here.

You keep falling back on the feelings argument when that doesn't even apply here.

The whole reason this committee is even being set in place is because we all have chipped in to being a different kind of space you clearly are not aware of....

Like... You just don't get it
No. The committee is being brought up because ya'll 'safe space' Mods aren't consistent or fair and get in your feelings. Ya'll can't even understand the issues at hand. That there confirms your responses are from the heart and not the brain.

Come hang out in the Mega thread for Thot Wars tonight so we can roast you. Only rule is you can't use your Mod 'powers' when we get you to start crying.
 
u see the lack of uniformity though...if you as the boss soft banned her then let her back why should she have to clear her name to Kandy?

It goes back to my question from the other thread. Should members who were already banned remain banned forever or be let back on a short leash?


She violated a rule in the rule book and was given an ample amount of chances to clear her name and treated the shit like a joke.
 
No. The committee is being brought up because ya'll 'safe space' Mods aren't consistent or fair and get in your feelings. Ya'll can't even understand the issues at hand. That there confirms your responses are from the heart and not the brain.

Come hang out in the Mega thread for Thot Wars tonight so we can roast you. Only rule is you can't use your Mod 'powers' when we get you to start crying.

Hang out in the mega thread?


Me??

:tuh:
 
Woke up to 26 reports this morning lol
Well AP did say if someone abuses it that they'd be banned. That thread could use a cleaning. Definitely not what it was back when @Banginscrew901 started it. Bunch of adlinks that can be PC STDs and people using encoding sites to make mega links difficult to get to. There also seems to be some kind of 'club' going on but I digress lol
 
It goes back to my question from the other thread. Should members who were already banned remain banned forever or be let back on a short leash?


She violated a rule in the rule book and was given an ample amount of chances to clear her name and treated the shit like a joke.

But did you ask her to clear her name prior to unbanning her?
 
We're just getting carried away and devolving back into the typical spectacle.

I'm not going for that shit.

So far

@deadeye
@Lea
@BDP™️
@Horsecock Williams
@Mister
@mike030270

Have thrown their names into the hat to be on the commission. We'd ideally like for a female to throw her name into the hat but if race , Baldheadlogic, or @B_A or any other females I've missed are not interested we'll have to proceed with another male poster.

If there are more posters that are seriously interested in joining the commission we can either do a vote or add seats.

Let's try to stop fighting eachother and talk solutions.
 
You're welcome to read the thread at anytime.

I was on page 5 when I made that post. By the time I replied yall had jumped 2+ pages so I was a bit behind.. I was responding specifically to @Goldie ?? sayin he decides who is on his staff... so I figured de-modding or removing mod privileges was off the table.. That's why I asked what the oversight would look like....

Inori compromised

he won too many giveaways

Nigga please. Lol @ asking a fuckin question somehow equalling me being compromised.

He really needs to stop playing Mr. Objectivity just say you not fucking with it. That's okay.

Never said I didn't fuck with it... you just perceived it that way. I asked a legit question(that hadn't been answered when I posted).. and still to some extent hasn't been answered. If demodding or suspension of certain mod privileges is off the table... what is the committee overseeing exactly? If that's been answered as I type this up and the thread goes another couple pages then coo....

lol and @King Freeman just because I dont agree with you 100% doesn't mean I'm with them or against you. lol yall gotta fuckin relax
 
It goes back to my question from the other thread. Should members who were already banned remain banned forever or be let back on a short leash?


She violated a rule in the rule book and was given an ample amount of chances to clear her name and treated the shit like a joke.
You didn't ask me but fuck it I'll throw in my opinion. Depends on the infraction, time since banned, if they've been forgiven, and if they know they fucked up and apologized.
If it's something truly fucked up then keep them banned. If everyone forgave them then let them come back
 
lol nah, you're still my nigga and poster of the year. But foh.

tenor.gif
 
We're just getting carried away and devolving back into the typical spectacle.

I'm not going for that shit.

So far

@deadeye
@Lea
@BDP™️
@Horsecock Williams
@Mister
@mike030270

Have thrown their names into the hat to be on the commission. We'd ideally like for a female to throw her name into the hat but if race , Baldheadlogic, or @B_A or any other females I've missed are not interested we'll have to proceed with another male poster.

If there are more posters that are seriously interested in joining the commission we can either do a vote or add seats.

Let's try to stop fighting eachother and talk solutions.
Not many females to begin with. Should just add them all ?‍♂️ Even if they don't really participate
 
Well AP did say if someone abuses it that they'd be banned. That thread could use a cleaning. Definitely not what it was back when @Banginscrew901 started it. Bunch of adlinks that can be PC STDs and people using encoding sites to make mega links difficult to get to. There also seems to be some kind of 'club' going on but I digress lol
To be fair, @Banginscrew901 continuous tried to keep Mega smooth in the first few days of its inception but folks cried about it being over watched and over modded. Deadass said the man who created the shit shouldn't have a say in how it was ran

Niggas wanted to play in the woods and now crying that it's real wolves out there. It had a Shepard and he was thrown from a cliff.

Yall got it how yall wanted it imo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top