COMMUNITY ABW Oversight Commission

[5th Letter]

Which mods abuse their powers?

 

[Elzo69Renaissance]

When the shit first went down, I wanted Love gone. There's a function on here that bans people without fully banning people, that's what happened to her.

She recently popped back up begging to be let back, one of the mods rode hard for her and I was outvoted on letting her back.

After the thread was upped by Kandy cuz she wasn't around when it first went down, it reopened the can of worms. Love again had a chance to clear her name, more fuckery ensued and I officially banned her.


No more, No less.

u see the lack of uniformity though...if you as the boss soft banned her then let her back why should she have to clear her name to Kandy?

 

[Fightbackmode2005]

Again... you don't understand the discussion or the issues at hand here.

You keep falling back on the feelings argument when that doesn't even apply here.

The whole reason this committee is even being set in place is because we all have chipped in to being a different kind of space you clearly are not aware of....

Like... You just don't get it

No. The committee is being brought up because ya'll 'safe space' Mods aren't consistent or fair and get in your feelings. Ya'll can't even understand the issues at hand. That there confirms your responses are from the heart and not the brain.

Come hang out in the Mega thread for Thot Wars tonight so we can roast you. Only rule is you can't use your Mod 'powers' when we get you to start crying.

 

[Goldie]

u see the lack of uniformity though...if you as the boss soft banned her then let her back why should she have to clear her name to Kandy?

It goes back to my question from the other thread. Should members who were already banned remain banned forever or be let back on a short leash?


She violated a rule in the rule book and was given an ample amount of chances to clear her name and treated the shit like a joke.

 

[Sony Montana]

Lmao nigga said come to thot wars tonight

 

[Duwop]

No. The committee is being brought up because ya'll 'safe space' Mods aren't consistent or fair and get in your feelings. Ya'll can't even understand the issues at hand. That there confirms your responses are from the heart and not the brain.

Come hang out in the Mega thread for Thot Wars tonight so we can roast you. Only rule is you can't use your Mod 'powers' when we get you to start crying.

Hang out in the mega thread?


Me??

:tuh:

 

[mike030270]

Woke up to 26 reports this morning lol

Well AP did say if someone abuses it that they'd be banned. That thread could use a cleaning. Definitely not what it was back when @Banginscrew901 started it. Bunch of adlinks that can be PC STDs and people using encoding sites to make mega links difficult to get to. There also seems to be some kind of 'club' going on but I digress lol

 

[Duwop]

Lmao nigga said come to thot wars tonight

:Pathetic:niggaz got me confused....

 

[Sony Montana]

:Pathetic:niggaz got me confused....

Lol no I was just thinking homie said it like thot wars was like race wars from Fast and furious

 

[Elzo69Renaissance]

It goes back to my question from the other thread. Should members who were already banned remain banned forever or be let back on a short leash?


She violated a rule in the rule book and was given an ample amount of chances to clear her name and treated the shit like a joke.

But did you ask her to clear her name prior to unbanning her?

 

[King Freeman]

We're just getting carried away and devolving back into the typical spectacle.

I'm not going for that shit.

So far

@deadeye
@Lea
@BDP™️
@Horsecock Williams
@Mister
@mike030270

Have thrown their names into the hat to be on the commission. We'd ideally like for a female to throw her name into the hat but if race , Baldheadlogic, or @B_A or any other females I've missed are not interested we'll have to proceed with another male poster.

If there are more posters that are seriously interested in joining the commission we can either do a vote or add seats.

Let's try to stop fighting eachother and talk solutions.

 

[Inori]

You're welcome to read the thread at anytime.

I was on page 5 when I made that post. By the time I replied yall had jumped 2+ pages so I was a bit behind.. I was responding specifically to @Goldie ?? sayin he decides who is on his staff... so I figured de-modding or removing mod privileges was off the table.. That's why I asked what the oversight would look like....

Inori compromised

he won too many giveaways

Nigga please. Lol @ asking a fuckin question somehow equalling me being compromised.

He really needs to stop playing Mr. Objectivity just say you not fucking with it. That's okay.

Never said I didn't fuck with it... you just perceived it that way. I asked a legit question(that hadn't been answered when I posted).. and still to some extent hasn't been answered. If demodding or suspension of certain mod privileges is off the table... what is the committee overseeing exactly? If that's been answered as I type this up and the thread goes another couple pages then coo....

lol and @King Freeman just because I dont agree with you 100% doesn't mean I'm with them or against you. lol yall gotta fuckin relax

 

[mike030270]

It goes back to my question from the other thread. Should members who were already banned remain banned forever or be let back on a short leash?


She violated a rule in the rule book and was given an ample amount of chances to clear her name and treated the shit like a joke.

You didn't ask me but fuck it I'll throw in my opinion. Depends on the infraction, time since banned, if they've been forgiven, and if they know they fucked up and apologized.
If it's something truly fucked up then keep them banned. If everyone forgave them then let them come back

 

[Big Lurko]

lol nah, you're still my nigga and poster of the year. But foh.

 

[Fightbackmode2005]

I'm well aware of this...

You don't need to convince me tho.... This thread is to convince Everybody else

No you aren't. We degenerates in the Mega thread reserve that designation for you until after you spend the evening with us for Thot Wars. 8:30 pm CST. Don't be scared.

 

[mike030270]

We're just getting carried away and devolving back into the typical spectacle.

I'm not going for that shit.

So far

@deadeye
@Lea
@BDP™️
@Horsecock Williams
@Mister
@mike030270

Have thrown their names into the hat to be on the commission. We'd ideally like for a female to throw her name into the hat but if race , Baldheadlogic, or @B_A or any other females I've missed are not interested we'll have to proceed with another male poster.

If there are more posters that are seriously interested in joining the commission we can either do a vote or add seats.

Let's try to stop fighting eachother and talk solutions.

Not many females to begin with. Should just add them all ?‍ Even if they don't really participate

 

[Chicity]

Well AP did say if someone abuses it that they'd be banned. That thread could use a cleaning. Definitely not what it was back when @Banginscrew901 started it. Bunch of adlinks that can be PC STDs and people using encoding sites to make mega links difficult to get to. There also seems to be some kind of 'club' going on but I digress lol

To be fair, @Banginscrew901 continuous tried to keep Mega smooth in the first few days of its inception but folks cried about it being over watched and over modded. Deadass said the man who created the shit shouldn't have a say in how it was ran

Niggas wanted to play in the woods and now crying that it's real wolves out there. It had a Shepard and he was thrown from a cliff.

Yall got it how yall wanted it imo

 

[Goldie]

But did you ask her to clear her name prior to unbanning her?

I dont talk to her.


At the end of the day she violated a rule in the rulebook.

 

[Sony Montana]

 

[Duwop]

No you aren't. We degenerates in the Mega thread reserve that designation for you until after you spend the evening with us for Thot Wars. 8:30 pm CST. Don't be scared.

Bruh, I have no desire to consort with a bunch of smut goblins....