u mean sustained? cuz if it's overruled you're allowing the question....i'm typing this as i'm walking to my car, lolOverruled. While abject racism is disgusting, it has no bearing on this case as bout nominees are of the same ethnicity.
u mean sustained? cuz if it's overruled you're allowing the question....i'm typing this as i'm walking to my car, lol
I think you misunderstood my statement, it was what could I have done that was so bad that I get a private poll, yet the guy calling people racial slurs gets a fair and honest public poll.Let's break for recess. We will reconvene at a time suitable for all parties involved
I think you misunderstood my statement, it was what could I have done that was so bad that I get a private poll, yet the guy calling people racial slurs gets a fair and honest public poll.
I think you misunderstood my statement, it was what could I have done that was so bad that I get a private poll, yet the guy calling people racial slurs gets a fair and honest public poll.
This is a legitimate question. Objection overruled!
this is why u need to be here to make sure his questions are clear....This is a legitimate question. Objection overruled!
Josh is killing yall man
Josh should be a mod
etherest nigga on the site
Josh killed this shit but I'm holding the fact that he likes MF Doom against him
He wasI think anyone expected Josh to actually come wit a real case.
Like legit believe that nigga was in a law library studying and gettin prepared for this. Lol
16 pages...i think the jury has seen enough to make an informed decision
I wanted to call Race to the stand but...you know
My final remarks are as follows:
Ladies and gentleman of the court, this has been a trying day. The defense's shenanigans by Mr. Chiles was a mockery of the ABW judicial system. I submit this final piece to support our case that in fact Josh was the heavy favorite among very well known posters
To me, this is support from the folks who know what they want in a people's mod, yet, we have no clear way of knowing a) if their vote was counted, b) who else participated in the poll. My client did not attack anyone. His comments, like many other members here were made in jest. A threat is when someone feels they are in danger. Those posters who the defense would have you believe that my client attacked still posted uninterrupted. They never lost posting privileges, they weren't denied access to the site, and their posts were never removed in fear of trying to pass off alternative facts.
They laughed, they ethered, but feared is one thing they were not.
This trial was just like the most recent election. A travesty made in large part by the defendant and his legal representation. Anything less than a recount is not only a disservice to my client, but a disservice to the fine members of this community.
Your honor, the plaintiff rests.