ur findings vs studies. which 1 am I gonna go with Du?
it isn't about whether they'd fuck a dark skinned woman despite talking down on dark skinned women. it's about WHY they're dissing dark skin or placing light skin on a pedestal in the first place.
and as I said, colorism goes beyond the dating realm. it has implications in the workplace, in education and in the prison system. not the same.
u conflated shit that isn't parallel. it was a false equivalency.
and i will concede on the implications outside of dating, but when it comes to dating, and sex, that shit...is bullshit......
the thread is talking about preference contradictions.....i introduced complexion to the argument solely for the reason that people often list complexion as a preference, and have been contradicted on that shit too many times to count. so yes in the regards of dating complexion is an equal parallel to height.
Now outside the dating world, there are many other things to consider.....but i promise you it has nothing to do with dating preference, because the whole idea of dating preference as a whole is a bullshit concept to begin with, cuz people flat out just don't know what they want until it's in their face.....
you can literally take any preference imaginable and apply it to the same argument, and it will fall apart...
people claim they won't date a fat person, but let the right fat person come in their life, and it happens....
attraction is unexplainable in many cases.....you can't really study a thing like attraction because there are too many variables once personality is introduced....
i am not ignorant at all to the issues associated with colorism.....but i'm just telling you some real good shit here......
10 times outta 10 when people start proudly boasting on who they will and won't date......they bullshiting