FEATURED Diddy Sentenced To 4 Years In Prison!

test

Diddy's Fate?

  • He's Cooked; 10 Years and Up

  • He'll Do A Couple Years

  • He Won't Do A Day


Results are only viewable after voting.
This my last time fam

The freakiness as an act itself isn't relevant

The circumstances surrounding the freakiness events are relevant

Him liking to smash his chick after she's been nutted on isn't relevant. Him flying in niggas, paying them to fuck his chick after she's been nutted on is relevant. Him orchestrating drug (that are illegal) consumption at these events is relevant.

Then what the fuck are you arguing with me about?

The bold has been my point this whole discussion. The crazy thing is you say the bold and then go on to do the same shit again.

the press and folks didn’t get to see the sex tapes, but IF on those tapes in the middle of the freakoffs puff is saying shit like“do blah blah or i’ll fire you, or do blah blah and i’ll pay you…”

these may not be just essentially porno style freakoffs, it very well may be him dominating and humiliating ppl to do sexual things. that would make them very relevant and not simply a ‘look at these ppl having fun group sex”

That's true. From what I've seen, it doesn't sound like the prosecution is drawing that connection, but I'm not following it that closely, so you might be right about their intent with the vid.
 
Then what the fuck are you arguing with me about?

The bold has been my point this whole discussion. The crazy thing is you say the bold and then go on to do the same shit again.



That's true. From what I've seen, it doesn't sound like the prosecution is drawing that connection, but I'm not following it that closely, so you might be right about their intent with the vid.
He's flying them across state lines to do those activities which makes it relevant

If he was into some low-key swingers club in cities that he frequents, he isn't flying people out across state lines to traffic them
 
giphy.gif
 
He's flying them across state lines to do those activities which makes it relevant

If he was into some low-key swingers club in cities that he frequents, he isn't flying people out across state lines to traffic them

AP3.0, what are we doing here?

Nobody's arguing that. You're bringing up shit that has nothing to do with my posts. You yourself just said the particular acts are not relevant. That's all I've been saying the whole time.

We all agree that him flying people across state lines and coercing other people to do sexual acts (regardless of what they are) are the crime.

So again, what are we doing here? You're telling me to sit this one out and are acting like what I'm saying is so crazy, but you don't seem to have any dispute with what I'm actually saying. Ya'll niggas accuse me of arguing just to argue, but it really seems like that's what you're doing now.
 
AP3.0, what are we doing here?

Nobody's arguing that. You're bringing up shit that has nothing to do with my posts. You yourself just said the particular acts are not relevant. That's all I've been saying the whole time.

We all agree that him flying people across state lines and coercing other people to do sexual acts (regardless of what they are) are the crime.

So again, what are we doing here? You're telling me to sit this one out and are acting like what I'm saying is so crazy, but you don't seem to have any dispute with what I'm actually saying. Ya'll niggas accuse me of arguing just to argue, but it really seems like that's what you're doing now.
The acts themselves aren't relevant provided they were all consensual acts but you can't have a conversation in this context with just the cause and not mention the effect
 
The acts themselves aren't relevant provided they were all consensual acts but you can't have a conversation in this context with just the cause and not mention the effect

That's not what I'm suggesting.

The prosecutor could have asked Cassie to confirm that freakoffs occurred, that they were sexual in nature, that money was exchanged and people were flown across state lines and left it at that. That would have been enough to build the case for the trafficking and prostitution charges. They got receipts with dates and all that to discuss. They seemingly have him dead to rights with that shit alone. There was no need to spend days needling into the exact sexual acts that were performed. They did that because they know they can probably get a couple jurors to vote based on revulsion rather than the facts of the case. That's all I'm saying.
 
That's not what I'm suggesting.

The prosecutor could have asked Cassie to confirm that freakoffs occurred, that they were sexual in nature, that money was exchanged and people were flown across state lines and left it at that. That would have been enough to build the case for the trafficking and prostitution charges. They got receipts with dates and all that to discuss. They seemingly have him dead to rights with that shit alone. There was no need to spend days needling into the exact sexual acts that were performed. They did that because they know they can probably get a couple jurors to vote based on revulsion rather than the facts of the case. That's all I'm saying.
What if someone didn't want to do those acts and felt pressured to do so. There's the relevancy
 
What if someone didn't want to do those acts and felt pressured to do so. There's the relevancy

Ask that person if he/she felt pressured or coerced to do anything during the freakoffs. When they say "Yes," move on.

I feel like you're bending over backwards to be dense about this. Are reactions and dumbass cheerleading posts from people like @Freeman worth that?
 
Ask that person if he/she felt pressured or coerced to do anything during the freakoffs. When they say "Yes," move on.

I feel like you're bending over backwards to be dense about this. Are reactions and dumbass cheerleading posts from people like @Freeman worth that?
The likely simple reason is to show proof. People went on the stand saying all these drug induced freak offs happened and Diddy was orchestrating everything

Showing the jury the actual video footage would be showing proof that it's not just hearsay
 
The likely simple reason is to show proof. People went on the stand saying all these drug induced freak offs happened and Diddy was orchestrating everything

Showing the jury the actual video footage would be showing proof that it's not just hearsay

Maybe. I'll back off about the video because ya'll have made good points about that.
 
Ask that person if he/she felt pressured or coerced to do anything during the freakoffs. When they say "Yes," move on.

I feel like you're bending over backwards to be dense about this. Are reactions and dumbass cheerleading posts from people like @Freeman worth that?
I'm trying to have a good faith convo with you about this but you bugging right now making these baseless accusations about me
 
Though it is kinda strange that we're in 2025 and prostitution is still illegal. Especially when men are flying women out from onlyfans and instagram to sleep with them

Though many states recently required you to use an ID to access porn online so and people are okay with that law so I doubt they'll make it legal anytime soon
 
Back
Top