Okay, if u hold by this so strongly show me that prior infected people are seeing hospitals at a significantly greater rate than fully vaxxed. I HIGHLY doubt u can.To be more precise, most of those articles are saying that the immunity is longer lasting not so much that it is more effective at screening for infection. I just scanned them quickly, but it doesn't see any of the articles go into depth about the severity of the reactions during infection. I mean, I think one did, but it didn't really provide any numbers for that point. If the vaxxed reaction is still superior then that would be reason for getting vaxxed even after having the disease.
RespectYour point is taken though. There's reason to excuse people who have had the disease from being mandated to get a vaccine.
Still disagree. With vaccines we were promised normality. Then they upped the necessary vax rate to achieve normality. Then they upped it again. Nothing is normal right now.I came at you about what? I said were oversimplifying. In that particular post, you were. Even now, you're providing decent evidence for the fact that there may be reason to have certain exceptions to vaccine mandates, but none of this is proof that the government shouldn't have pushed strongly for vaccinating the populace.
Agree to disagree.