Welcome To aBlackWeb

Director Antoine Fuqua Caught Cheating On Lela Rochon With Nicole Murphy

I disagree.

Well I can't speak for anyone else, but I said as much in my post earlier. It doesn't matter which way it goes. Both partners have a duty to maintain themselves for the other within reason. If you gonna fall off that should be a mutual thing.
 
I think he should just get a divorce.

It aint his job to fix that woman if he aint break her.

Thats a big if tho...

I suspect she didnt enter that relationship broken.

He needs to take some ownership, she aint just go to sleep fine and wake up looking like Fiona, that was prime real estate right there, and coulda been the difference between them paying for monthly electricity or getting on the Tesla Powerbank.

But thats just me....

I'm done.gif

LMAOOOO
 
I think niggas is missing the point ....it ain’t that the nigga took down Nicole cuz we all would lmao it’s the fact that Nicole and Lela were friends

Facts. That’s the dirty part that’s the shit that can’t be blamed on the person who got cheated on. Like the f we in the same clique she know they not divorced
 
how do we know she wasnt being hateful and a B in her young tight days?

not too many people are strong enough to not act like they got options when they got the eye of the public.

Doesn't matter if she was a major bitch. Even more reason to leave her evil fat ass if that's the case. Bottom line he was wrong for stepping out on his wife.

tenor.gif


Facts. That’s the dirty part that’s the shit that can’t be blamed on the person who got cheated on. Like the f we in the same clique she know they not divorced

Yeah Nicole should have kept that sorry ass apology to herself. She knew that man was still married...
 

Attachments

  • 1564073828646.png
    1564073828646.png
    341.9 KB · Views: 6
Doesn't matter if she was a major bitch. Even more reason to leave her evil fat ass if that's the case. Bottom line he was wrong for stepping out on his wife.

tenor.gif




Yeah Nicole should have kept that sorry ass apology to herself. She knew that man was still married...
While I don't condone cheating....in certain situation I understand.

Over my lifetime....I have thought one way about what things are and it could be totally wrong. It just looks one way when its the other way.

Like the homie said....
This hits nerves in people.

I think what some of the ladies may see is the lack of unconditional love.
I get that. Weight, non fallng off baby phat, losing her looks and niggas want to act different. He should love her regardless and unconditionally. And you are right.

Let's flip it to something else...do we have the same for an athlete being taken to the cleaners after his career is over. The money, and travel and luxury life needs to slow down now. Most chicks refuse to downgrade their lifestyle..shit, can most people be OK downgrading? Do we feel sorry for the athlete on some she was wrong or do we say bag secured?


Men are attracted to looks.
Women attracted to resources.
Not all but a lot. High percentages.

So if we can't be mad at a woman for taking a dudes money and enjoying life when she put nothing into it.
Don't be mad at dude for doing what he did.

Same block
Different houses.
But only one is wrong for some reason.

We all have conditions to our unconditional love
 
I love when niggas talk big shit like they asses can’t be bad built either. I’m pretty sure half y’all don’t look how you looked in your “prime”.

I'm waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay off from my prime of 155-160lbs.

Here's the difference though: The day I got married I got on the scale at 230lbs. Which means I was already overweight coming into the relationship. Today I'm at 240, which really is the heaviest I've been in a long ass time, but still only 10lbs over what I started out with in this marriage.

Lela, in 1999, was still looking good as fuck. That year she was in Any Given Sunday with Jamie Fox, so anyone can pull footage and pretty much get an idea of what she looked like on her wedding day. You go from that to her latest pics and you can see she's barely even recognizable.

That's the difference , if we got into our marriages looking this way, then so be it. She didn't, and now she looks plain awful. Meanwhile Antoine Fuqua looks like he almost lives in the gym today. He looks like he done got a bit more swole since they got married in 99 which means he actually gave a fuck about his health and appearance, unlike Lela.
 
Last edited:
While I don't condone cheating....in certain situation I understand.

Over my lifetime....I have thought one way about what things are and it could be totally wrong. It just looks one way when its the other way.

Like the homie said....
This hits nerves in people.

I think what some of the ladies may see is the lack of unconditional love.
I get that. Weight, non fallng off baby phat, losing her looks and niggas want to act different. He should love her regardless and unconditionally. And you are right.

Let's flip it to something else...do we have the same for an athlete being taken to the cleaners after his career is over. The money, and travel and luxury life needs to slow down now. Most chicks refuse to downgrade their lifestyle..shit, can most people be OK downgrading? Do we feel sorry for the athlete on some she was wrong or do we say bag secured?


Men are attracted to looks.
Women attracted to resources.
Not all but a lot. High percentages.

So if we can't be mad at a woman for taking a dudes money and enjoying life when she put nothing into it.
Don't be mad at dude for doing what he did.

Same block
Different houses.
But only one is wrong for some reason.

We all have conditions to our unconditional love


Fennis Dembo is single as fuck now that he's a janitor living with his momma. A far cry from the days when he was on the cover of Sports Illustrated and playing for the Pistons.
 
This article might give more insight on how she gained weight.



I honestly think Lela gives Antoine a pass to fuck whoever outside their marriage. This is probably the first time they got caught.

There's a lot more nuance to this topic then spoken on. I'm sure Antoine loves Lela to death but it's difficult to hide no longer being attracted to someone. Marrying a dime and watching her lose that attractiveness over time will fuck with any man. Lela knows this and probably allows him to run free.

I also don't like this turning into a "men vs women" issue. There's plenty of women out there mad as fuck that their husband got fat as hell and can barely fuck for longer than 10 minutes before asking for a break or catching a cramp. That's why the whole fucking the pool boy thing exists.
 
I'm waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay off from my prime of 155-160lbs.

Here's the difference though: The day I got married I got on the scale at 230lbs. Which means I was already overweight coming into the relationship. Today I'm at 240, which really is the heaviest I've been in a long ass time, but still only 10lbs over what I started out with in this marriage.

Lela, in 1999, was still looking good as fuck. That year she was in Any Given Sunday with Jamie Fox, so anyone can pull footage and pretty much get an idea of what she looked like on her wedding day. You go from that to her latest pics and you can see she's barely even recognizable.

That's the difference , if we got into our marriages looking this way, then so be it. She didn't, and now she looks plain awful. Meanwhile Antoine Fuqua looks like he almost lives in the gym today. He looks like he done got a bit more swole since they got married in 99 which means he actually gave a fuck about his health and appearance, unlike Lela.

It’s 20 years tho. Do we know if she been big for long or is this as recent as last year?
 
You reasonably smart comparing men’s arguments leading to warfare and women’s arguments being snide remarks and shit. Common sense to say what’s better for society. But common sense ain’t common

Men arguing drives progress because of our innate need to succeed. Not just what I wrote, but shit like the discovery of bacteria and how to fight infection was driven by men arguing over how and why we get sick. It drove astronomical research to prove that we are not the center of the universe. It drove the space race. It pushes technology forward. It has driven innovation as we strive to one-up each other.

I used the examples I used to illustrate extremes of men arguing back and forth. Granted I could have used the shit I said in this reply, but I was half-ass making a joke and half ass being serious, so why not?

Still, women arguing does what for society?
 
Men arguing drives progress because of our innate need to succeed. Not just what I wrote, but shit like the discovery of bacteria and how to fight infection was driven by men arguing over how and why we get sick. It drove astronomical research to prove that we are not the center of the universe. It drove the space race. It pushes technology forward. It has driven innovation as we strive to one-up each other.

I used the examples I used to illustrate extremes of men arguing back and forth. Granted I could have used the shit I said in this reply, but I was half-ass making a joke and half ass being serious, so why not?

Still, women arguing does what for society?

Women just got the right to vote here in the last century. I would think any lack of progress would be due to a male dominated world.

If a white dude listed all his accomplishments of his group and asked what we did in comparison I think we would all have an issue with that. Even if we list all accomplishments in spite of not being the main group. You pretty much regulating women to being just catty and participating in pointless conflicts
 
Women just got the right to vote here in the last century. I would think any lack of progress would be due to a male dominated world.

If a white dude listed all his accomplishments of his group and asked what we did in comparison I think we would all have an issue with that. Even if we list all accomplishments in spite of not being the main group. You pretty much regulating women to being just catty and participating in pointless conflicts

Here's what happened when a woman started a company and hired nothing but women (at least initially).


Catfights over handbags and tears in the toilets. When this producer launched a women-only TV company she thought she'd kissed goodbye to conflict...

Over in one corner sat Alice, a strong-minded 27-year-old who always said what she thought, regardless of how much it might hurt someone else. In the other corner was Sarah, a thirtysomething high-flier who would stand up for herself momentarily - then burst into tears and run for the ladies.

Their simmering fight lasted hours, egged on by spectators taking sides and fuelling the anger. Sometimes other girls would join in, either heckling aggressively or huddling defensively in the toilets. It might sound like a scene from a tawdry reality show such as Big Brother, but the truth is a little more prosaic: it was just a normal morning in my office.

The venomous women were supposedly the talented employees I had headhunted to achieve my utopian dream - a female- only company with happy, harmonious workers benefiting from an absence of men.

It was an idealistic vision swiftly shattered by the nightmare reality: constant bitchiness, surging hormones, unchecked emotion, attention-seeking and fashion rivalry so fierce it tore my staff apart.

When I read the other day that Sienna Miller had said there was no such thing as 'the Sisterhood', I knew what she meant.

I can understand why people want to believe that women look out for each other - because with men in power at work and in politics, it makes sense for us to stick together.

In fact, there was a time when I believed in the Sisterhood - but that was before women at war led to my emotional and financial ruin.



And this also happened:


... A social scientist might want to perform an experiment where groups of men and groups of women are left to their own devices, having to work together to survive against the elements and build a civilization from scratch. However, this scientist would have a very hard time convincing ethical review boards that the inevitable suffering of his participants would weight up against the value of the data.

Well...

Reality television is not bound by ethical constraints.

A few years ago, I had the pleasure of watching the Dutch version of Survivor (Expeditie Robinson) with my feminist roommate. That particular season would have two islands, one populated by men and one populated by women. My roommate had been promoting that particular series to me and the other students in the house for weeks because it would show us, according to her, what a society run by women (free from the evils of patriarchy) would be like.

Oh boy...

Here is what happened: initially both groups were dropped on their respective islands, given some supplies to get started and left to fend for themselves. In both groups there was some initial squabbling as people tried to figure out a local hierarchy. The men pretty much did whatever they felt was necessary... there was no leader giving orders.

Men who felt like hunting, foraging or fishing did so. Another guy decided he was fed up with sitting on sand and started making benches. Others built a hut that gradually grew and evolved. Another guy cooked every night. Within days a neat little civilization was thriving, each day being slightly more prosperous than the previous one.

The women....

They settled into a routine as well. The hung up a clothesline to dry their towels, then proceeded to sunbathe and squabble. Because unlike men, women were unable to do anything without consensus of the whole group. And because it was a group of at least a dozen women, consensus was never reached. During the next few episodes, the women ate all their initial supplies, got drenched by tropical storms several times, were eaten alive by sand fleas and were generally miserable. The men on the other hand, were quite content. There were disagreements of course, but they were generally resolved.


You can read the rest of the articles for yourself, but the fact is, if women ran shit we would probably be extinct as a species.


""If civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts ." - Camille Paglia, world renown feminist scholar, professor, and activist.
 
Here's what happened when a woman started a company and hired nothing but women (at least initially).


Catfights over handbags and tears in the toilets. When this producer launched a women-only TV company she thought she'd kissed goodbye to conflict...

Over in one corner sat Alice, a strong-minded 27-year-old who always said what she thought, regardless of how much it might hurt someone else. In the other corner was Sarah, a thirtysomething high-flier who would stand up for herself momentarily - then burst into tears and run for the ladies.

Their simmering fight lasted hours, egged on by spectators taking sides and fuelling the anger. Sometimes other girls would join in, either heckling aggressively or huddling defensively in the toilets. It might sound like a scene from a tawdry reality show such as Big Brother, but the truth is a little more prosaic: it was just a normal morning in my office.

The venomous women were supposedly the talented employees I had headhunted to achieve my utopian dream - a female- only company with happy, harmonious workers benefiting from an absence of men.

It was an idealistic vision swiftly shattered by the nightmare reality: constant bitchiness, surging hormones, unchecked emotion, attention-seeking and fashion rivalry so fierce it tore my staff apart.

When I read the other day that Sienna Miller had said there was no such thing as 'the Sisterhood', I knew what she meant.

I can understand why people want to believe that women look out for each other - because with men in power at work and in politics, it makes sense for us to stick together.

In fact, there was a time when I believed in the Sisterhood - but that was before women at war led to my emotional and financial ruin.



And this also happened:


... A social scientist might want to perform an experiment where groups of men and groups of women are left to their own devices, having to work together to survive against the elements and build a civilization from scratch. However, this scientist would have a very hard time convincing ethical review boards that the inevitable suffering of his participants would weight up against the value of the data.

Well...

Reality television is not bound by ethical constraints.

A few years ago, I had the pleasure of watching the Dutch version of Survivor (Expeditie Robinson) with my feminist roommate. That particular season would have two islands, one populated by men and one populated by women. My roommate had been promoting that particular series to me and the other students in the house for weeks because it would show us, according to her, what a society run by women (free from the evils of patriarchy) would be like.

Oh boy...

Here is what happened: initially both groups were dropped on their respective islands, given some supplies to get started and left to fend for themselves. In both groups there was some initial squabbling as people tried to figure out a local hierarchy. The men pretty much did whatever they felt was necessary... there was no leader giving orders.

Men who felt like hunting, foraging or fishing did so. Another guy decided he was fed up with sitting on sand and started making benches. Others built a hut that gradually grew and evolved. Another guy cooked every night. Within days a neat little civilization was thriving, each day being slightly more prosperous than the previous one.

The women....

They settled into a routine as well. The hung up a clothesline to dry their towels, then proceeded to sunbathe and squabble. Because unlike men, women were unable to do anything without consensus of the whole group. And because it was a group of at least a dozen women, consensus was never reached. During the next few episodes, the women ate all their initial supplies, got drenched by tropical storms several times, were eaten alive by sand fleas and were generally miserable. The men on the other hand, were quite content. There were disagreements of course, but they were generally resolved.


You can read the rest of the articles for yourself, but the fact is, if women ran shit we would probably be extinct as a species.


""If civilization had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts ." - Camille Paglia, world renown feminist scholar, professor, and activist.

Welp no more gender debates with you. You view women as less than and got articles backin it up. Let’s no do this again.
 
Back
Top