SneakDZA
High Brow Negro
To get back to the thread at hand…
I disagree, because after decades, this gets almost IMPOSSIBLE to prove. Plus, at some point, people will if this is truly meritorious, or some sort of shake down.
Sworn testimony is considered evidence. If that testimony can be corroborated it's probably pretty easy to "prove" something like this if it was known amongst others.
But either way... as has already been said... just because it's difficult to prove something doesn't mean you dismiss it outright. That's not how this shit works.
I mean I can think of plenty of reasons why the alleged victims never said anything until now but I can't think of many reasons why 2 women who were 13-15 when they were interacting with him would all of a sudden decide to lie and go after a bankrupt octogenarian legally.
And that's not to say that what they're saying is true or false... we don't know that. But it's not fair to dismiss them because you happen to think there's an expiration date on child rape.