Welcome To aBlackWeb

The Official World Politics Thread

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/devos-inspector-general-audit-civil-rights-complaints-dismissals

DeVos’ Inspector General To Audit Dismissals Of Civil Rights Complaints

The Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Education has announced that it is scrutinizing how the department handles civil rights complaints, potentially fueling a debate over the Trump administration’s scaled-back vigilance on a hot-button issue.

Under Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, the department has pulled back from the Obama administration’s emphasis on investigating allegations of systemic civil rights violations by school districts and colleges, instead focusing its attention on individual complaints of mistreatment, as ProPublica has reported in a series of articles.

According to its annual report released Wednesday, one of the inspector general’s priorities is determining whether the department’s civil rights division has been appropriately dismissing discrimination complaints in accordance with federal policies and procedures. OIG reviews typically assess the efficiency, effectiveness and integrity of department operations and look for fraud, waste or abuse.

“The audit is currently underway and we hope to be done in 2019,” said Catherine Grant, a public affairs liaison for the office, which is an independent entity within the department that audits federal programs and investigates internal fraud.

Grant declined to discuss details of the audit, citing a longstanding policy put “in place to protect and maintain the integrity of our efforts.” The department’s inspector general, Kathleen S. Tighe, has served in that position since 2010, and she has spent most of her career in the federal government ferreting out fraud.

Catherine Lhamon, who led the department’s civil rights office from August 2013 until January 2017 and currently chairs the United States Commission on Civil Rights, said that the new audit is badly needed.

“External oversight seems more than warranted given the high dismissal rates and OCR’s whipsawing on its authority not to investigate topics Congress specifically charged it to protect,” Lhamon said. “Students deserve better from their government.”

“Our top priority in the Office for Civil Rights is ensuring all students have equal access to education free from discrimination,” an education department spokesman said in an email. “As we continue to work to improve OCR’s case processing, we welcome feedback.”

This year, ProPublica analyzed federal data on more than 40,000 civil rights cases at the Education Department, which we received through multiple public records requests. Our analysis found that the department’s civil rights office has grown more lenient in recent years.

Under the Trump administration, the department is less likely than it was under Obama to find wrongdoing by school districts and colleges on a range of issues, from racial and sexual harassment to meeting the needs of students with disabilities.

We also found that the department has scuttled more than 1,200 civil rights investigations that were inherited from the Obama administration and were open for at least six months. These cases were closed without any corrective action or findings of wrongdoing, with the department often citing insufficient evidence.

In Bryan, Texas, for example, investigators from the department’s civil rights office began looking into racial discrimination in school discipline in 2013. They uncovered several instances of black students who were punished more harshly than their white peers for the same offenses. After the Trump administration took over, the case was closed, with no finding of wrongdoing.

The Office for Civil Rights, which is responsible for investigating violations in public schools across the country, handles more than 10,000 complaints annually.

Under the Obama administration, the office prioritized broader and more time-consuming inquiries. The Trump administration has made efficiency its priority, focusing more on individual complaints, which can be resolved more quickly, and clearing its backlog of cases.

The most recent audit of the department’s civil rights office was conducted in 2015, during the Obama administration, and found that the office adequately resolved discrimination complaints in “a timely and efficient manner and in accordance with applicable policies and procedures.”

The current administration’s approach to civil rights allegations against school districts and colleges has drawn ire from Democratic senators and civil rights advocates. Several of them welcomed the announcement of the inspector general’s audit.

“We have seen shifts in policies that marginalize students of color,” said Liz King, director of education policy for The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. “Our hope would be that the Education Department, with the knowledge of this investigation, will shift direction.”

The Education Department is clearly caring out Trump’s nationalist agenda...
 
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckr...tors-newly-released-documents-reportedly-show

Whitaker Misled FTC Investigators, Newly Released Documents Reportedly Show


Acting attorney general Matthew Whitaker may be in hot water over his hot tub-marketing days, according to reports based on newly released FOIA docs.

Bloomberg reports that Whitaker told an FTC investigator that he “never emailed or wrote to consumers” on behalf of World Patent Marketing (WPM), a company that was shut down this year for being a “scam” in the words of the FTC.

“You’re not going to believe this,” Bloomberg cites an official with the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection as writing on Oct. 24, 2017. “Matt Whitaker is now chief of staff to the Attorney General. Of the United States.”

Whitaker started receiving complaints from disgruntled customers in April 2015, the Washington Post reports.

Whitaker purportedly forwarded the complaints to WPM’s CEO, in one case writing: “Another WPM customer reaching out to me. FYI. I do not plan to call back unless you want me to.”

WPM was shut down in May by the FTC for allegedly charging customers thousands of dollars for marketing, distribution, and branding services for new inventions and then pocketing the money without living up to the agreements.

An email from the court case and reports since have suggested that Whitaker strong-armed customers who complained about the business.

“I am familiar with your background and your history with [WPM CEO] Scott [Cooper],” Whitaker wrote. “Understand that we take threats like this quite seriously.”

In one news release, Bloomberg reports, Whitaker is quoted as saying “World Patent Marketing has become a trusted partner to many investors that believe in the American Dream.”

Drain the swamp tho...
 
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbcs-maddow-storms-ahead-of-fox-news-in-ratings-this-week/

MSNBC’s Maddow Storms Ahead of Fox News in Ratings This Week

MSNBC is having a great week in the ratings.

Granted, Fox News won November, with ratings titan Sean Hannity marking his eighth consecutive month as the most watched show. But MSNBC has stormed ahead of his network this week, with Rachel Maddow winning every night in total viewers.

On Thursday night, Maddow had the most watched show in all of cable, notching a massive 3.407 million total viewers and 633,000 viewers in the key 25-54 demographic.

Thursday night football — which saw the New Orleans Saints fall to the Dallas Cowboys — was the second most watched event on cable. Behind the game was The Last Word, Lawrence O’Donnell‘s 10 p.m. show on MSNBC.

Then came Fox News: Tucker Carlson was third, with 2.589 million total viewers and 456,000 in the demo, followed by Hannity, who notched 2.504 million viewers and 385,000 in the demo.

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes was close behind, in fifth place, and Laura Ingrahamlanded 10th.

It marks a strong showing for Maddow this week. She was number one in total viewers and the demo on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday this week as well. Other MSNBC shows, like Nicolle Wallace‘s Deadline: White House at 4 p.m., also leapfrogged Fox News.
 
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...can-descent-face-dire-picture-of-racism-in-eu

People of African descent face 'dire picture' of racism in EU

Almost a third of people of African descent have experienced racial harassment in past five years, survey finds


Almost a third of people of African descent polled in a new EU survey say they have experienced racial harassment in the last five years, a report that claims racial discrimination is “commonplace” across 12 European countries reveals.

People of African descent face “a dire picture” of discrimination in housing, the workplace and everyday life, the survey of 5,803 people by the European Union’s fundamental rights agency states.

Perceived racial harassment, such as offensive gestures, comments or threats, was highest in Finland (63%) and Luxembourg (52%) and least prevalent in the UK (21%) and Malta (20%).

One in 20 respondents said they had been a victim of a physical attack in the last five years, ranging from 14% in Finland to 2% in Portugal. The figure was 3% for the UK.

“The survey paints a dire picture of the reality on the ground,” said the agency’s director, Michael O’Flaherty, in a preface to the report. Referring to the EU’s 2000 racial equality directive, he said: “Almost 20 years after adoption of EU laws forbidding discrimination, people of African descent face widespread and entrenched prejudice and exclusion.”

O’Flaherty wrote that: “Racial discrimination and harassment are commonplace,” adding that discriminatory profiling by the police is “a common reality”.

Most people who took the survey were first and second-generation immigrants, who come from, or have at least one parent from a sub-Saharan African country. The study also includes people from British and French overseas territories, including the Caribbean.

It does not, however, include black Europeans whose families have been settled in Europe for three or more generations, because most EU countries do not collect such data – a gap the agency is urging governments to remedy.

“We do not claim that we represent the experience of all black people in the European Union,” said Rossalina Latcheva, one of the report’s authors. The agency was convinced, she said, that “these results are indicative for experiences of different people of African descent also from third or fourth generation, fifth generation”.

The report will be launched in the European parliament on Wednesday at an event hosted by the Italian politician Cécile Kyenge, one of only three black MEPs in the 751-strong assembly. The MEP has argued that the EU has a gap in its equality strategy and has drafted a non-binding resolution to promote equality for an estimated 15 million people of African descent in the EU. Her text will be voted on next week.

The latest survey lays bare the extent of the task. One in 10 respondents said that racial discrimination had stopped them from renting an apartment or house, with a wide variation between countries: 37% reported this experience in Italyand 28% in Luxembourg, compared with 3% in the UK.

In the labour market, people of African descent with a degree were almost twice as likely to work in low-skill occupations than the general population.

Being stopped by the police was also a big concern. One in 10 respondents said they had been stopped by the police in the year before the survey. Nearly half of those people saw that action as racially motivated, but this rose to 70% in Italy. While a majority of respondents trusted the police, trust fell when police stops were deemed to be racially targeted.

The agency said one “particularly unsettling finding” was that younger people tended to report worse discrimination than older respondents.

Muslim women of African descent wearing a headscarf or face veil also reported discrimination in the year before the survey: 27% said they had experienced inappropriate staring or offensive gestures, while 15% reported verbal assaults and 2% said they had been victims of physical attacks.
 
1343870932629.gif
 
Back
Top