The Official MCU Thread

[Infamous114]

Theres a rumor out there that they are scrapping the Kang storyline

Joanna Robinson said a source told her they dumped Loveness from Kang Dynasty cause of that

She's the one that wrote the Marvel book

 

[Iceberg_Taylor]

Damn so they really made Majors and Loveness the fall guys due to Quantumania not hittin at the box office


Loki 2 ending makes sense now since there was no definitive word about Kang; the rumor about the reshoot might have been true then.

 

[Infamous114]

Well, Loveness wrote the film and the writing was lacking (amongst other things)

 

[AP3.0]

I miss the days when I was more invested lol

Idk who loveness is lol

At this point, I understand they'll probably never have another ten yr build up to a big bad villain and I'm ok with that but whatever they decide, it just has to make "sense".

 

[Freeman]

So nobody knows shit. Thanks guys.

 

[Iceberg_Taylor]

Yeah this really aint about Loveness, more so they seem to be moving along from Majors even though the trial hasnt started.

 

[Infamous114]

Allegedly lol

 

[Infamous114]

Damn so they really made Majors and Loveness the fall guys due to Quantumania not hittin at the box office


Loki 2 ending makes sense now since there was no definitive word about Kang; the rumor about the reshoot might have been true then.

 

[Infamous114]

 

[Infamous114]

 

[AP3.0]

Great summary imo

 

[God_Body]

 

[RandomOne]

They did a much better job building Thanos up and then his appearance

 

[Infamous114]

 

[The Lonious Monk]

They did a much better job building Thanos up and then his appearance

Huh? What you mean? Thanos was the shit in IW. They barely even did that much to build him up. He had a little cameo in Avengers and a small part in GotG.

 

[konceptjones]

Huh? What you mean? Thanos was the shit in IW. They barely even did that much to build him up. He had a little cameo in Avengers and a small part in GotG.

Nah, I would disagree. What they did was put him as the boogeyman in the shadows manipulating everything from the first Thor flick that showed the gauntlet (albeit a fake) until he finally makes an appearance in IW.

 

[The Lonious Monk]

Nah, I would disagree. What they did was put him as the boogeyman in the shadows manipulating everything from the first Thor flick that showed the gauntlet (albeit a fake) until he finally makes an appearance in IW.

I'm not saying the buildup wasn't good. I'm just saying it's crazy to claim that the buildup was better than his appearance. When IW came out, people were saying that Thanos was the Darth Vader of this era. To this day, people are still saying "Thanos was right" every time humans do some dumb shit. To this day, IW was probably the only superhero movie where the villain was not only the protagonist of the movie but wins in the end.

 

[RandomOne]

I'm not saying the buildup wasn't good. I'm just saying it's crazy to claim that the buildup was better than his appearance. When IW came out, people were saying that Thanos was the Darth Vader of this era. To this day, people are still saying "Thanos was right" every time humans do some dumb shit. To this day, IW was probably the only superhero movie where the villain was not only the protagonist of the movie but wins in the end.

Reread the post. I said then. Not than. It wasn't a comparison

 

[The Lonious Monk]

Reread the post. I said then. Not than. It wasn't a comparison

Yep, that explains it. "I basically read it as they did much better with his buildup than with his appearance."

 

[Infamous114]